Quote:
Originally Posted by Brush Okie
Please tell us more.
|
To think there have not always been "
toxic leader" issues is naive at best - it just didn't start "under Klinton and the way he downsized the military" (which was a choice his administraton made to continue the reorganization begun by the previous administration).
I would argue the records of the likes of a North, Burnside, Hooker, McClellan, MacArthur, and Custer would certainly fit one or more of the traits of 'bad leadership' described by Barbara Kellerman - incompetence, rigidity, intemperance, callousness, corruption, insularity, evil - as would many others at all levels of command back through the annals of US military history.
A problem I think many reformers struggle with when discussing such a topic is what I think BLB was talking about in his post - the difference between leadership and command. As experienced soldiers know, they are not the same thing, for not all commanders are good leaders, and not all leaders are good commanders. George McClellan, for example, was a truly inspirational leader who won the total devotion of his troops, yet consistently failed to achieve decisive victory in battle and politically challenged his CinC (a career ending move if there ever was one). On the other hand, U.S. Grant was an excellent combat commander to whom few in his command showed any great affection.
Here's my last boss in the Army before I retired - I was his WHNS SPOC for the BW (TKN and TKS) and Luxembourg - he walked the walk, and his staff meetings were
< 30 mins and ended with a short
Three Stooges episode for those who could stay the extra 15-20 mins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F40d3...embedded#at=44
We had a running joke - he used to refer to me as a "
leaf eater" (I'm tall and he's short) and I used to tell him it was easier to see what was going on from up there.
I think 'toxic leadership' is an issue which has plagued the military throughout History and always will.
"Now...everyone not committed to any other details go report to the Group CSM NLT 0900 for area beautification."
And so it goes...
Richard