Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Sig, sometimes you post stuff that goes over the heads of just about everyone here. Sometimes I have to read what you wrote a couple of times to get it.
In this case I just don't get it.
To me the list did measure the range of POVs of those voted on.
John and Daughter got ranked where they were because of their points of view.
This was also a closed vote - only those that were sent the list got to vote.
If it was open the Ron-bots would have spammed it and he would be most loved with everyone else at the bottom.
|
I should have quoted
cbtengr's post, specifically the comment about "marketing" and added the following links.
http://professionalsoldiers.com/foru...ad.php?t=20916
http://www.people-press.org/quiz/political-typology/
What I have in mind is to "market" American conservationism in such a way that Americans who have had their fill of leftist policies and polarizing rhetoric can readily see the ideological range of the American political right.
To me, a "score card" approach may enable conservatives to avoid racial and gender politics because, as a nation, we're not where we need to be to have a discussion about race or gender that doesn't quickly degenerate into finger pointing, scapegoating, and brawling.