Maple Flag |
03-09-2017 12:26 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryW
(Post 624860)
There are state players who use Wikileaks as a tactical weapon. Begs the question what the strategic variety will look like.
More white noise. Not a new jammer but effective when applied to information resources. I smell the Russians.
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
|
8000+ pages "leaked". That pretty well rules out 99.99% of the interested population being able to personally review this and form their own opinion on this information, and therefore having to rely on other people's/organizations' analysis, or more likely, other people's/organizations' conclusions without any real analysis.
Maybe the docs come from U.S. sources. Maybe they're made in Russia (or China) to look like U.S. sources. Maybe they're a carefully mixed blend of legit stolen docs and forged disinformation intended to result simply in greater disinformation. Anything coming from Wikileaks, going in any direction, strikes me as an agitated and confusing fur ball of cloaks and daggers taking place in a wilderness of mirrors (borrowing a lot from others' analogies here).
Personally, I'm treating all of it as uninteresting noise about things I generally assume to be true and unconcerning anyway, as I have neither the time nor the capabilities to truly assess it, and all of it is likely rife with disinformation. I take it for granted that all spy agencies across the world with the capability to electronically hack, eavesdrop, surveil or whatever do so...period. Perhaps my attitude if part of the long game of this - creating an environment where surveillance is normalized and accepted by the public.
That said, global competition at the international level is the more pressing issue for me. Breaking/circumventing various laws is merely and question of legal strategy, risk management and mitigation.
That said, I also suspect that Wikileaks is simply a Sub-directorate of the SVR....:rolleyes:
|