Quote:
I would never expect anything more from the 99%, why do you think we call them sheeple? |
Quote:
Dusty: LOL! |
A couple of interesting articles on the topic.
"Dear Mr. Security Agent, Federal, state, or local. You, the man or woman with the badge, the sworn LEO or FLEA and those who inhabit the many law enforcement niches in between and on all sides. This essay is directed to you, because in the end, how this turmoil about gun control turns out will depend largely upon your decisions and actions over the coming months and years. I sincerely wish that members of Congress—who may soon be voting on new gun control measures—would read this essay, but I realize that’s a pipe dream, considering the impenetrable bubbles around those exalted entities. So I’ll settle for you, Mr. (or Ms.) Security Agent, since you already gobble up everything on the internet, and I don’t have to seek you out. A decade ago I wrote the novel Enemies Foreign and Domestic, a tale about how tragic events involving the misuse of firearms can be used by an evil administration to misinform and mold public opinion to support its malign anti-freedom policies...."(cont. at link) http://westernrifleshooters.wordpres...ecurity-agent/ "An Open Letter to the Men and Women of the Connecticut State Police: You are NOT the enemy (UNLESS YOU CHOOSE TO BE.) The following letter was sent via email to members of the Connecticut State Police, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. There are 1,212 email addresses on the list. There were 62 bounce-backs. 15 February 2014 To the men and women of the Connecticut State Police and the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection: My name is Mike Vanderboegh. Few of you will know who I am, or even will have heard of the Three Percent movement that I founded, though we have been denounced on the national stage by that paragon of moral virtue, Bill Clinton. Three Percenters are uncompromising firearm owners who have stated very plainly for years that we will obey no further encroachments on our Second Amendment rights. Some of you, if you read this carelessly, may feel that it is a threat. It is not. Three Percenters also believe that to take the first shot in a conflict over principle is to surrender the moral high ground to the enemy. We condemn so-called collateral damage and terrorism such as that represented by the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Waco massacre. We are very aware that if you seek to defeat evil it is vital not to become the evil you claim to oppose. Thus, though this letter is certainly intended to deal with an uncomfortable subject, it is not a threat to anyone. However, it is important for everyone to understand that while we promise not to take the first shot over principle, we make no such promise if attacked, whether by common criminals or by the designated representatives of a criminal government grown arrogant and tyrannical and acting out an unconstitutional agenda under color of law. If we have any model, it is that of the Founding generation. The threat to public order and safety, unfortunately, comes from the current leaders of your state government who unthinkingly determined to victimize hitherto law-abiding citizens with a tyrannical law. They are the ones who first promised violence on the part of the state if your citizens did not comply with their unconstitutional diktat. Now, having made the threat (and placed the bet that you folks of the Connecticut State Police will meekly and obediently carry it out) they can hardly complain that others take them seriously and try by every means, including this letter, to avoid conflict...."(cont. at link) http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogsp...-women-of.html Very interesting reads. TR |
Paper Wins Gun-Permit Information Suit Against Putnam; Suit Filed Against Rockland
Quote:
http://http://pearlriver.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/speak-out-putnam-county-clerks-call-to-action-pearlriver |
Perfect example of the media intentionally making a tense dangerous situation worse. Its insane
|
scratching head, "and why do I keep renewing my permit in a state that doesn't require one?"
Those kind of acts garner trust and loyalty |
Quote:
Of course they're going to stir the pot. :munchin |
Quote:
Pat |
Timing is everything and budget deficits mean something...
An interesting 2010 article describing one possible path for legislative pushback that might now get some legs in response to the registration, publication and eventual confiscation dynamic currently taking place in NY and CT.
"Enormous police effort that could be going directly toward reducing crime is instead being diverted into registering, regulating and tracking the innocent." Constitutional Carry The right to discreetly bear arms should not require government-issued permission slips. It's time for "Freedom To Carry" to replace "Right To Carry" http://www.gunlaws.com/ConstitutionalCarry.htm |
Quote:
Looking forward to the day that the courts use a dictionary on the word "Bear" (the verb). Would sure hate to have to carry a bear around :D |
Quote:
:D |
Quote:
Here comes my new year's word, Mor..., nope it speaks for itself. |
Quote:
His YELLOW, RED and DEAD LINES I totally agree with. We can all see this happening across America. The chipping away of freedom in a subversion and sabotage style that in under the radar for most. I think Switzerland and Israel or better examples of nations that have good gun-control and citizens that understand the use of guns. |
Switzerland been moving in the other direction lately. More restirctions on FA and you can not carry period so my friend there tells me.
CD |
Hell yeah
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®