U.S. Special Forces Command wants US companies to build Russian weapons
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...ces-want-23495
Quote:
|
I recall reading this earlier in the year. I thought it had been pulled.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...-made-pkm-nsv/ From solicitation: "For decades surrogate forces and allies have depended on foreign made weapons which are used in conflicts around the world. USSOCOM intermittently supplies surrogate forces and allies with foreign made weapons from international intermediaries. These foreign made weapons lack interchangeability and standardization which hinders field and depot level part replacement. Developing a domestic production capability for foreign like weapons addresses these issues while being cost effective as well as strengthens the nation’s military-industrial complex, ensures a reliable and secure supply chain, and reduces acquisition lead times. PHASE I: Conduct a feasibility study to assess what is in the art of the possible that satisfies the requirements specified in the above paragraph entitled Description. As a part of this feasibility study, Proposers shall address all viable system design options with respective specifications to reverse engineer or re-engineer and domestically produce the following foreign like weapons: 7.62×54R belt fed light machine gun that resembles a PKM (Pulemyot Kalashnikova Modernizirovany), and a 12.7×108mm heavy machine gun that resembles a Russian designed NSV (Nikitin, Sokolov, Volkov). Hereafter, foreign like weapons is defined as a 7.62×54R belt-fed machine gun and a 12.7×108mm heavy machine gun. Offerors must describe their approach to replicate foreign made weapons and mass produce foreign like weapons with the same form, fit and function as the foreign made weapon counterpart. The approach must describe all facets of design to production to include the actions, activities, and processes necessary to 1) develop drawings and specifications to replicate foreign weapons, 2) acquire and manufacture materials and parts, 3) bring together a production capability, and 4) develop methods for testing and evaluating the manufactured weapon to drawings and specifications. The approach shall also address the manufacture of spare parts to support fielded weapons." "....as strengthens the nation’s military-industrial complex" ? |
Lots of the current 100% us made ak has been a travesty to the original
That contract would have been a money pit. On the other hand, zillion dollar contract incentive could finally motivate US manufacturer to make solid Kalashnikov platform. Surely Larue, seekins, knights etc can do wonders with stamped metal But it won't cost the same as those made at Izmash. So yea, still more economically feasible just to buy from eastern block |
Buying the weapons isn't the issue. Its maintaining them with the correct parts. I just T/I'd 9 AKs this weekend from 6 different countries while down range. Only the 2 had some interchangable parts. Only thing they all have in common is the ammo chambering, magazine and manual of arms. Which goes back to the article above.
CD |
Quote:
So the guide rod of an Egyptian madi won't fit to Bulgarian variant, and Chinese norinco recoil spring won't retrofit to the original Russian ? I understand the Yugo/zastava tends to have a fit of its own. I'm just wondering if the large basic fieldnstrip components do not interchange as readily. I guess I've overestimated the ak downrange compatibility Thank you for the education CD |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:05. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®