Quote:
Quote:
|
To the Citizens of Washington State and Their American Countrymen
Thought this would be an appropriate location for Patrick Henry Society's letter RE their upcoming event on 7 February.
Quote:
|
Fed Ban on Interstate Transfers UNConstitutional
Anything but SCOTUS never seems to be the final word (and maybe not then) but this is good to read about.
Quote:
|
Never heard of this guy but the vid below gives me an excuse to bump a great thread for some newer members.
The 2nd Amendment : For Muskets Only?! "People have been telling us for years that the 2nd amendment was written in a time of Muskets, and that it doesn't apply to the evolved weapons of today. Is it true?" StevenCrowder Published on Feb 10, 2015 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CquUBWHU2_s |
Probably one of the best presentations/testimony I've heard yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdUaPDiW-GY He's speaking in reference to the current attempt to remove the "may issue" restrictions in the state of Maryland. With his background as Commander of the licensing division responsible for issuing permits and his self-professed previous status as being in favor of gun control, his testimony has to carry a lot of weight. |
Quote:
|
Gun Speach Gag Order
http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/10/...vt-last-month/
The Obama administration’s latest anti-gun salvo isn’t about reducing gun violence or stopping the export of dangerous weapons, it’s about pure retaliation against a non-profit that sued the government in federal court last month. Defense Distributed, a pro-Second Amendment non-profit organization that provides blueprints, plans, and machinery to fabricate or finish firearm components, has been at war with the State Department for nearly two years....... and.. On June 3, just four weeks after Defense Distributed filed its complaint in federal court, the State Department suddenly decided to propose a new rule giving it the authority to pre-approve speech related to publicly available firearm plans. The State Department’s play here is obvious: it hopes to promulgate a new rule making its previous anti-speech efforts superficially legal in order to short-circuit Defense Distributed’s court case. If that were to happen, the non-profit would then have to file a new and separate suit alleging the unconstitutionality of the new rule. |
Thanks pcfixer. The current regime continues promulgating things that conflict with each other, one sub-para to the next (Congress has no monopoly on that). It is sufficient for them to kick the can down the road with enough obstacles in the way of its citizens such that prior restraint on speech is accomplished under threat of prison sentence. While they seem to be benevolent in their new "definition" of public domain, what is chilling is what they propose to call a "defense article(item)".
Direct link to their proposed ass-covering. (Warning: Bring your mental whiteboard.) In the end, it's ok if it's in the public domain - but it isn't legally in the public domain unless they say so. Can they support this POS in court? I doubt it; but it seems they can get the same result by tying a peasant up for year$$$ if they cast their eye on you. |
And to borrow the metaphor from another thread, here's the next slice of salami:
Quote:
Any disabled Vets that applied for social security disability on the basis of PTSD are in line for this one... Quote:
Get ready, here comes the full court press for the last 18 months of the administration. And let's not forget the second order effect that Veterans will stop seeking help for PTSD if they think their right to bear arms will be revoked. Why is it that liberals think they can win a fight when only the other side is armed? |
Quote:
All it's going to take is for a dem to take office in 2016 and some are going to march..... |
Quote:
All vets who have put in for disability claims for PTSD, through the VA, are setting themselves up for failure and to be singled out by "our" government. Now I am not saying that those who truly are in need of care, should not seek assistance/treatment. But just be prepared for the possible consequences.:munchin |
http://www.davekopel.org/2A/Foreign/...the-greeks.htm
I thought this was a great article that relates to this exact subject. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®