PDA

View Full Version : Lawyer for Saddam wants trial venue moved


Gypsy
07-18-2005, 11:10
I'm sure he does...but I'll bet he's more concerned for himself than the safety of his "client"...


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050718/ap_on_re_mi_ea/saddam_trial_1;_ylt=AhSoidY8FsyxeTo9_SFpQmZX6GMA;_ ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

LONDON - A lawyer for Saddam Hussein said Monday that Iraq's insurgency has made Baghdad far too dangerous a venue for the former leader's trial, and that the proceeding should be moved to another country.

"Do you fancy spending a year or more in Baghdad, going to court five days a week? Would you feel safe there? " lawyer Giovanni di Stefano said in an interview with The Associated Press.

"Baghdad couldn't even prevent the recent kidnapping and killing of the Egyptian ambassador. There are also many Iraqis who want to see Saddam executed and many others who want to see him freed. That means the defense and prosecution would both be in danger there," di Stefano said.

He said Saddam's defense team has contacted the Swedish government about the possibility of holding such a trial in Sweden. But in Stockholm on Monday, Swedish Justice Ministry spokesman Alexander Valentin said that he was not aware of any official request.

Di Stefano criticized Iraq's handling of Saddam, saying the fact that he has been held in custody for 548 days without being formally charged is a violation of international law. "The whole point of the Iraq war was replace Saddam and everything he stood for. But there is a total disregard of the law there now," the lawyer said.

On Sunday, the Iraqi Special Tribunal filed its first criminal case against Saddam for a 1982 massacre of Shiites and said a trial date would be set within days, despite U.S. fears a trial would inflame tensions at a time the Shiite-led government is trying to lure Sunnis away from the insurgency.

The tribunal said the investigation into the July 8, 1982, massacre of an estimated 150 Shiites in Dujail, 50 miles north of Baghdad, has been completed, and the case was referred to the courts for trial. Saddam is accused of involvement in the massacre as retaliation for a failed assassination attempt as he drove through the city.

The date for the trial of Saddam and three others was expected to be determined in "the coming days," said Raid Juhi, chief judge of the tribunal. If convicted, Saddam could face the death penalty.

Some U.S. officials have quietly urged the Iraqis to proceed carefully in prosecuting Saddam as the Shiite-led government seeks to draw Sunnis away from the insurgency.

Di Stefano said each country has its own laws and procedures regarding trials, but that Saddam's criminal case should have been announced in Iraq by a prosecutor, not the judges who hear the case.

The lawyer said the defense team believes that Iraq's government now has 7,000 witness statements and 2 million documents related to the prosecution of Saddam, none of which have been shared with the defense.

"We haven't seen one sheet of paper," Di Stefano said.

He said the defense team has corresponded with Saddam and that it received his last letter several weeks ago.

The lawyer said Saddam obviously can't discuss legal matters, so the missives focus instead on the former leader's interest in books, women, horse racing and soccer, and the fact that he is writing poems and a memoir.

Di Stefano also said Saddam may eventually decide to represent himself, if he is ever formally charged and put on trial.

"Well, he is a lawyer. Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic did the same thing. He took it upon himself," Di Stefano said, adding that no leader wants to discuss all the inner workings of his government with outsiders, even if they have been hired to represent him in court.

Sigi
07-18-2005, 11:37
I would think it would cost more in security to have it in Iraq, plus take up resources to house and feed these idiots. I say move it. I don't know to where but I am sure they will not be nations lining up to take the case.

Gypsy
07-18-2005, 11:40
Perhaps.

My feeling is he should be tried in his country...judged by the Iraqis. They want and deserve justice for the torture, murder, starvation etc etc they endured during his "reign".

Sigi
07-18-2005, 11:43
Perhaps.

My feeling is he should be tried in his country...judged by the Iraqis. They want and deserve justice for the torture, murder, starvation etc etc they endured during his "reign".
We are in 100% agreement, and since I know diddly squat about International Law (besides the class I took in college - and I forgot most of it. :rolleyes: ) I wonder if we cannot just move all the participants. But if I were the Iraqi's I would probably nix this idea and demand he be tried in Iraq.

sf11b_p
07-18-2005, 13:56
There's probably an underground bunker or two left. Let the Iraqi people give him a fair trial in one and then bury him in it.

Airbornelawyer
07-18-2005, 14:16
Di Stefano also said Saddam may eventually decide to represent himself, if he is ever formally charged and put on trial. "Well, he is a lawyer. Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic did the same thing. He took it upon himself," Di Stefano said, adding that no leader wants to discuss all the inner workings of his government with outsiders, even if they have been hired to represent him in court.The Associated Press is too kind or too ignorant to mention it, but if Di Stefano cannot represent Saddam and Saddam chooses to represent himself, that is because, of the two, only Saddam actually is a lawyer.

In the words of the Law Society of England and Wales, "[Di Stefano]'s not a solicitor and he's not a barrister. As far as we're concerned he has no legal qualifications whatsoever".

Di Stefano is a self-styled lawyer who attaches himself to controversial and high-profile cases like Commander Arkan (Zeljko Raznjatovic) and Slobodan Milosevic,. He is also a businessman convicted of fraud and is the founder and "Party Leader" of a semi-fascist party, the so-called "Radical Party of Great Britain".

Di Stefano criticized Iraq's handling of Saddam, saying the fact that he has been held in custody for 548 days without being formally charged is a violation of international law.Rudolf Hess made his ill-fated plane trip on May 11, 1941. The Nuremberg Trials began on October 18, 1945. My math may be off, but that's about 1,621 days (to be fair, I don't know when Hess or the other Nazis were "formally charged," although indictments were not read until November 20, 1945).