View Full Version : Law banning female genital mutilation ruled unconstitutional; muslims win!
Team Sergeant
11-21-2018, 12:07
A huge win for the criminally insane muslims, it's OK to physically mutilate your children!!!!!! Actually a huge win for all criminal religious organizations.
Religious Blood Rituals, god/allah wants you to mutilate your children.
You are cleared hot to mutilate around the world and in America!!!!!!!!!!!
What's "your" Religious Blood Ritual???? :munchin
Sheeple will believe most anything you tell them to believe.
What next? sharia law?
Wonder what the left-wing, progressive, feminist are going to say about this? My guess, absolutely nothing.
("Where's my mutilating knife?")
And we whine about "docking and castrating" sheep..............
Law banning female genital mutilation ruled unconstitutional; Michigan doctors cleared of charges
By Lukas Mikelionis | Fox News
A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that the U.S. law banning female genital mutilation was unconstitutional and dismissed charges against several doctors in Michigan who carried out the procedure on underage girls as part Muslim sect’s religious practice.
U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman ruled that Congress had no authority to enact a law that criminalizes female genital mutilation (FGM). “As despicable as [FGM] may be… [Congress] overstepped its bounds” by banning the procedure, the judge said.
The ruling came after defense lawyers challenged the 22-year-old genital mutilation law that hasn’t been used until 2017 when Dr. Jumana Nagarwala was arrested and accused of mutilating the genitalia of young girls.
insanity continued here:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-rules-law-banning-female-genital-mutilation-is-unconstitutional-dismisses-charges-again-michigan-doctors
SouthernDZ
11-21-2018, 12:53
I ran into this when my ODA went to Sudan in the late 80's, before it was two countries. In the big cities such as Khartoum and Omdurman, it's a surgical procedure complete with anesthesia. In the countryside (everywhere else) it's a sharp piece of glass and the child's female relatives holding them down while ignoring her screams. This form of female genital mutilation is based on the all too common Islamic belief that women should not enjoy sex and it's tragic and brutal.
PedOncoDoc
11-21-2018, 13:24
Jews were watching this ruling closely, as it may have been further applied to their male circumcision rituals.
Remington Raidr
11-21-2018, 23:23
Jews were watching this ruling closely, as it may have been further applied to their male circumcision rituals.
I asked my mom why she had that done to me, and she said because everybody else did. It kind of seems hypocritical of making this a national issue.:confused:
I asked my mom why she had that done to me, and she said because everybody else did. It kind of seems hypocritical of making this a national issue.:confused:
Well, to be fair, to be the same you would have to cut your dick off at the root.
tom kelly
11-24-2018, 06:04
IS THIS FEDERAL JUDGE, BERNARD FREDMAN IN THE 9th CIRCUT??? ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF JUDGES LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH... This kind of micromanaging the LAWS passed by Congress gives Federal Judges, who are appointed to the position way too much power. My suggestion for more judicial restraint would have the judge removed from the bench if his ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court and a loss of all pay and benefits. This slap on the wrist would give "Progressive" liberal left judges more of an incentive to JUDGE and NOT LEGISLATE. tom kelly
Badger52
11-24-2018, 06:35
Why are these people not simply charged with 1st-degree sexual assault of a minor, with special circumstances?
rsdengler
11-24-2018, 06:52
You are cleared hot to mutilate around the world and in America!!!!!!!!!!!
What's "your" Religious Blood Ritual???? :munchin
Wonder what the left-wing, progressive, feminist are going to say about this? My guess, absolutely nothing.
("Where's my mutilating knife?")
LOL....What do you think the "Left Wing Progressive Feminist" would be saying....Chirp, Chirp.....Exactly....Now if it was, oh let's say a "Christian Ritual", then they would be marching down the street in their Vagina "Mutilated" Hats.....Yep, it's OK for this Blood Ritual because you are a Muslim.......:munchin
FREDMAN is a former Army JAG and a Reagan nominee. No shortage of Bozos in the government. :rolleyes:
Badger52
11-24-2018, 10:21
...Bozos in the government. :rolleyes:Yup; there are no partisan lines drawn for this affliction.
mojaveman
11-25-2018, 12:50
I asked my mom why she had that done to me, and she said because everybody else did. It kind of seems hypocritical of making this a national issue.
Agree. Maybe there should be a national ban on both female and male infant genital mutilation.
Agree. Maybe there should be a national ban on both female and male infant genital mutilation.
Cut it off at the root and maybe I'd consider it.
Circumcision is nowhere even close to FGM.
Jeez, you guys, ...... If you're that insecure with your manhood start a #metoo movement for circumcision. Don't try and piggyback on FGM.
bushmaster11
11-25-2018, 22:38
The decision did not rule in favor of the practice. What it said was it did not belong in Federal system yet. Like murder, it is a state problem. This should be decided by the state and has to go through ALL state courts before it can become Federal.
J R Sends
DOL
The decision did not rule in favor of the practice. What it said was it did not belong in Federal system yet. Like murder, it is a state problem. This should be decided by the state and has to go through ALL state courts before it can become Federal.
J R Sends
DOL
Not quite
This is the quote from the article:
"....The federal law was passed in 1996 under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The federal judge ruled the banning of the procedure under the clause was unconstitutional.
“There is nothing commercial or economic about FGM,” Friedman wrote in the opinion. “[FGM] is not part of a larger market and it has no demonstrated effect on interstate commerce. The Commerce Clause does not permit Congress to regulate a crime of this nature.”..."
This could be considered Judicial "non-activism". Congress uses the Commerce Clause to bludgeon the American people with all kinds of laws. Most, like this one, having nothing - or a very, very tenuous claim - to do with commerce but yet are approved by the courts.
As much as I find FGM reprehensible, and I believe the judge does too, I think his ruling is legally correct. If anything, this ruling might actually be used as a precedence to strike down other over reaching uses of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
x/S
Anybody want to see how far the Commerce Clause can be stretched you can look up Wickard v. Filburn. A man raising wheat for his own consumption can be prohibited under the Commerce Clause.
WarriorDiplomat
11-29-2018, 20:54
Anybody want to see how far the Commerce Clause can be stretched you can look up Wickard v. Filburn. A man raising wheat for his own consumption can be prohibited under the Commerce Clause.
The era of the industrial revolution, followed by lobbyist, regulation, licensure, Globalization etc.... restricted freedoms to a sickening level
Has anyone else noticed that The Tree of Liberty seems to be wilting?
Has anyone else noticed that The Tree of Liberty seems to be wilting?
Wilting?
Dont kid yourself - leftists replaced that thing with an artificial tree years ago while the rest of us were deployed overseas.............
Wilting?
Dont kid yourself - leftists replaced that thing with an artificial tree years ago while the rest of us were deployed overseas.............
You mean THAT is the reason why there is an artificial tree standing in the parking lot island outside of that Starbucks?
tom kelly
11-30-2018, 23:01
The era of the industrial revolution, followed by lobbyist, regulation, licensure, Globalization etc.... restricted freedoms to a sickening level
Freedom comes out of the end of the barrel of a gun....DON'T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
WarriorDiplomat
12-01-2018, 11:43
Freedom comes out of the end of the barrel of a gun....DON'T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
Foook yeah
I have been debating some idiots from my hometown in which they are defending NAMBLA's right to free speech over a case in which a cho-mo who used pamphlets and literature NAMBLA sent him on how to groom the child and (he eventually killed him) how to silence and avoid detection of LEO and parents as part of his defense the ACLU lost a lot of lawyers and benefactors who quit and pulled support in disgust because even the communist founded ACLU majority of its members felt NAMBLA was complicit in enabling the molester/killer except for the slightly more immoral lacking in moral judgement ones who stuck it out
Neither idiot understand the constitution, have never read the arguments that produced it or understand the capitulation that led to the bill of rights being added in order to ratify in the 11yrs it took, and the interpretation within the context of society and the problem presented, the reason why we are able to make laws that protect the safety of the citizens that places some limits on what you can say such as yelling fire in a movie theatre for no reason the call to actions are limited......it takes some study.
Like ANTIFA and NAMBLA have proved IMO the right to free speech has limits in what is consider peaceful speech.....they do not grasp that the forefathers gave us the Constitution with the hopes that we would use it responsibly.....free speech is already being further perverted by the same ACLU supporters anti-bullying for example holds the verbal assaulter accountable if it leads to the victim harming themselves
What is disturbing is neither idiot will condemn NAMBLA or believe that limiting them protects children...WTF...yes I asked if they were members
Condemning NAMBLA is a no-brainer.
Not condemning NAMBLA is a big red flag as to judgement.
Of course there are reasonable limits to speech - for these neighbors not to concede that the grooming of children for sexual exploitation - should of course be limited by law is a sad reflection on how twisted our society has become.
Of course, I’m just an old dinosaur what the fuck do I know.
Foook yeah
I have been debating some idiots from my hometown in which they are defending NAMBLA's right to free speech over a case in which a cho-mo who used pamphlets and literature NAMBLA sent him on how to groom the child and (he eventually killed him) how to silence and avoid detection of LEO and parents as part of his defense the ACLU lost a lot of lawyers and benefactors who quit and pulled support in disgust because even the communist founded ACLU majority of its members felt NAMBLA was complicit in enabling the molester/killer except for the slightly more immoral lacking in moral judgement ones who stuck it out
Neither idiot understand the constitution, have never read the arguments that produced it or understand the capitulation that led to the bill of rights being added in order to ratify in the 11yrs it took, and the interpretation within the context of society and the problem presented, the reason why we are able to make laws that protect the safety of the citizens that places some limits on what you can say such as yelling fire in a movie theatre for no reason the call to actions are limited......it takes some study.
Like ANTIFA and NAMBLA have proved IMO the right to free speech has limits in what is consider peaceful speech.....they do not grasp that the forefathers gave us the Constitution with the hopes that we would use it responsibly.....free speech is already being further perverted by the same ACLU supporters anti-bullying for example holds the verbal assaulter accountable if it leads to the victim harming themselves
What is disturbing is neither idiot will condemn NAMBLA or believe that limiting them protects children...WTF...yes I asked if they were members
It could be said that the only thing worse than a pedophile is anyone who would defend them. I believe in public crucifixion for all pedophiles and, if someone wants to defend them, string them up, too. There is nothing worse!
WarriorDiplomat
12-02-2018, 13:48
It could be said that the only thing worse than a pedophile is anyone who would defend them. I believe in public crucifixion for all pedophiles and, if someone wants to defend them, string them up, too. There is nothing worse!
Concur.,I say it often..silence is consent