PDA

View Full Version : Army using drug waivers, bonuses to fill ranks


SouthernDZ
08-02-2018, 06:16
Army using drug waivers, bonuses to fill ranks.
This comes mighty close to Einstein’s definition of insanity.


Under the gun to increase the size of the force, the Army is issuing more waivers for past drug use or bad conduct by recruits, and pouring an extra $200 million into bonuses this year to attract and retain Soldiers. According to data obtained by The AP, nearly one-third of all the waivers granted by the Army in the first six months of this fiscal year were for conduct and drug problems, mainly involving marijuana use. That number is significantly higher than the other three military services, and represents a steady increase over the past three years. At the same time, the Army increased bonuses by more than 30 percent this year, with enlistment money going to recruits for high-tech jobs such as satellite communications and cryptologists. Recruits in those jobs can get up to an additional $30,000 for a five-year enlistment. The enlistment bonuses grew by $115 million this year over last year, while money to entice Soldiers already in the service to stay grew by almost $100 million, according to the Army.
Army leaders said there has been no move to reduce enlistment standards in order to meet recruitment goals. They said there are more waivers in part because of the increased competition for recruits as they try to add another 8,000 Soldiers to the force this year. Waivers have long been used to enlist young people who might otherwise be unqualified for military service due to a wide array of medical, conduct or other reasons. Historically, the bulk of the waivers approved by all four military services involve a broad range of medical issues.

The Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force provided their waiver data upon request in April, but Army officials refused to do so. Ultimately the Defense Department provided totals to The Associated Press for all the services. The data shows that the Army has increasingly brought in recruits that need conduct or drug waivers. In 2016, nearly 19 percent of the waivers were for drug use and conduct, in 2017 that grew to almost 25 percent, and for the first half of 2018 it exceeded 30 percent. Those totals far exceed the other three services. According to the Pentagon data, the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force did not approve any waivers for drug use in the last three years. And their use of conduct waivers is significantly less than the Army - hovering between 2-13 percent of all the waivers they approve, depending on the service.

Army officials defend the conduct waivers, saying that while a small number may be for major crimes, most involve recruits who faced misdemeanor charges or were ultimately were found guilty of lesser charges or never convicted at all. A waiver is required, for example, even if the recruit was a juvenile and the charge was dismissed after restitution, community service or other conditions were met. Recruits who get waivers are then required to pass all other military standards for their job.

The Army's annual recruiting mission is 76,500 this year, an increase of 8,000, said MG Joe Calloway, director of military personnel management. The overall size of the Army, now about 992,000, is being increased to more than 1.03 million by late next year. "It is an exceedingly competitive environment," said Calloway, adding that the Army will not lower standards to meet the goal. "We will miss a number before we will do that." He said the Army has met about 90 percent of its recruitment goal so far this year.

The Marine Corps has faced the same battle for recruits. “It is definitely more challenging now than it has been in the last five years. As unemployment approaches 5 percent, we are in direct competition with the private sector for the same talent," said Marine MG Paul Kennedy, who until recently headed Marine recruiting command. The Marines, however, have maintained about the same level of waivers for bad conduct since 2016, which has been roughly 8 percent of approved waivers. And the Marine Corps, the smallest military service, has also cut back on enlistment bonuses - from about $8.2 million in 2017 to $8 million this year. "If you enlist for money, it's harder for them to remain committed when the chips are down," said Kennedy. "We sell intangibles. Our signing bonuses are so small, and it's spread out over the four year enlistment, so they're only getting a few hundred dollars extra."

The Navy slightly increased its waivers for bad conduct over the past three years, but it still equals less than 13 percent of the total. Meanwhile, the Navy also is tripling the amount of enlistment bonuses this year, to about $100 million. The largest incentives are for sailors going to jobs in the nuclear or cryptology fields or for SEALs and other special operations forces.
Just 7 percent of the Air Force waivers have been for bad conduct this year, also a small increase. And the Air Force has cut back on enlistment bonuses, from about $19 million to almost $14 million. Instead, bonuses are given more to encourage airmen to stay in the service. Retention bonuses increased a bit this year to $280 million.

Medical hurdles make up the majority of enlistment waivers across the military. They range from issues as routine as asthma, eyesight, or skin problems to more complex health conditions, such as previous sports injuries that may have healed, but still must be evaluated. For example, if someone received medication for attention deficit disorder in their youth, they need a waiver. Anyone still on the medication would not be allowed to enlist. Army leaders this week tightened some waiver restrictions, adding several crimes to the list of offenses that disqualify a person from enlisting, and requiring higher ranking officers to review waivers for certain medical and psychological conditions.

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/08/01/army-using-drug-waivers-bonuses-to-fill-ranks/

TrapperFrank
08-02-2018, 09:05
"Marty, we're going back, back to the future!" Doc Brown

WarriorDiplomat
08-02-2018, 13:15
The Obama era was destructive to the force the social changes he made by opening all jobs to females and the emboldening of the LGBTQ will affect our ability for awhile. No real warriors the ones they want have any desire to join the socially damaged military. To build the military from the ashes of Obama is gonna be hard....the bad leadership in SF has the same effect on SOF that will be felt for a decade as well as the Obama Generals still being around are doing the same at least until the sychophants are completely out and the standards adhered too this is the reality.....until then the military has a long residual memory due to the reputation given by those who were in and experienced it...many of those sons and daughters will be deterred or should be. IMO there are just as bad of people in today as there will be with waivers the concern I have are the gang members that get recruited who are trained in the military who get out and now law enforcement are outmatched worse than they were before.....the street gangs that live in our cities who benefit from this damage are the ones that I watch for.

HardRoad
08-04-2018, 05:55
We're giving bonuses to kids with drug waivers? Why not eliminate the middleman and just give them drugs?

PRB
08-04-2018, 10:58
I believe a great majority of the drug waivers are for ADHD drugs applied while they were kids....not for crack heads.
There had been a ban on recent ADHD use or medical records indicating long term usage.

They should articulate what 'drugs' are in the article....can lead to misinterpretation.

CSB
08-04-2018, 15:56
Reminds me of a program that only the old timers would remember:
"Project 100,000."

Better known as "McNamara's Hundred Thousand."

The declared goal was to bring into the Armed Forces 100,000 men (per year) who would have otherwise been deemed unfit for military service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000

Project 100,000 soldiers included those unable to speak English, of low mental aptitude, with minor physical impairments, as well as those who were slightly overweight or underweight, among other categories. They also included a special category—a control group of normal soldiers. Each of the different categories was identified in their official personnel records with a large red letter stamped on the first page of their enlistment contract. Human resources offices had to prepare reports on them, to be submitted monthly to the Department of the Army. The monthly reports did not include the identity of the soldiers.

Did Project 100,000 help those soldiers who were allowed to join outperform their peers who did not serve? In other words, was the military service good for their life as a veteran? No.

Comparisons between Project 100,000 participants and their nonveteran peers showed that, in terms of employment status, educational achievement, and income, nonveterans appeared better off. Veterans were more likely to be unemployed and to have a significantly lower level of education. Income differences ranged from $5,000 [to] $7,000, in favor of nonveterans. Veterans were more likely to have been divorced.

Bad for the military, and bad for the men.

Badger52
08-06-2018, 19:42
McNamara...

Bad for the military, and bad for the men.

Plus ca change... and all that.
:rolleyes:

Intel NCO
08-07-2018, 10:38
I believe a great majority of the drug waivers are for ADHD drugs applied while they were kids....not for crack heads.
There had been a ban on recent ADHD use or medical records indicating long term usage.

They should articulate what 'drugs' are in the article....can lead to misinterpretation.

Yep. It doesn't help that there seems to be a lot of over diagnosing for ADHD/ADD for kids who are just "too active" to sit down, shut up, and listen attentively when they're 7 or 8 years old..