View Full Version : DoJ & FBI con·spir·a·cy "a conspiracy to destroy the government"
Team Sergeant
12-06-2017, 20:02
con·spir·a·cy
kənˈspirəsē/
noun
noun: conspiracy; plural noun: conspiracies
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
"a conspiracy to destroy the government"
synonyms:
plot, scheme, plan, machination, ploy, trick, ruse, subterfuge; informalracket
"a conspiracy to manipulate the results"
the action of plotting or conspiring.
"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"
synonyms:
plotting, collusion, intrigue, connivance, machination, collaboration; treason
"conspiracy to commit murder"
Imagine the "arrests" if this happened when barry soetoro was in office.............
Let me know when the shooting starts......... I'm really getting sick of the extremely corrupt left-wing oppressive/socialists
'Over 10,000 texts' between ex-Mueller team officials found, after discovery of anti-Trump messages
By Jake Gibson | Fox News
Justice Department officials are reading through “over 10,000 texts” between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Fox News has learned, after it emerged Strzok was removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe following the discovery of anti-Trump messages between them.
Department of Justice officials told Fox News they are in the process of going through the texts so they can hand them over to the House Intelligence Committee.
Strzok, who was an FBI counterintelligence agent, had worked on the Mueller probe, but was reassigned to the FBI’s human resources department after the discovery of anti-Trump text messages with Page, with whom he was having an affair. Page was briefly on Mueller’s team, but since has returned to the FBI.
The disclosure of those messages revived Republican concerns about the objectivity of Mueller’s probe.
It’s unclear whether a significant number of the 10,000 texts have anything to do with Trump or the probe itself.
Justice Department officials say the process of reading and redacting the texts could take “weeks,” and that the thousands of text messages between Strzok and Page span over “several months.”
The review process comes as the committee also threatens to move forward with a contempt resolution against top DOJ and FBI officials barring an imminent breakthrough — after the agencies did not comply with a deadline to hand over long-sought information that goes well beyond text messages.
Strzok is a focus of their efforts. House investigators have long regarded him as a key figure in the chain of events when the bureau, in 2016, received the infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and launched a counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling in the election that ultimately came to encompass FISA surveillance of a Trump campaign associate.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has sought documents and witnesses from the DOJ and FBI to determine what role, if any, the dossier played in the move to direct the surveillance.
Strzok briefed the committee on Dec. 5, 2016, sources said. But within months of that session House Intelligence Committee investigators were contacted by an informant suggesting that there was “documentary evidence” that Strzok was purportedly obstructing the House probe into the dossier.
Early Saturday afternoon, after Strzok’s texts were cited in published reports by the New York Times and the Washington Post – and Fox News had followed up with inquiries about the department’s refusal to make Strzok available to House investigators – the Justice Department contacted the office of House Speaker Paul
Ryan to establish a date for Strzok’s appearance before House Intelligence Committee staff, along with two other witnesses long sought by the Nunes team.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/06/over-10000-texts-between-ex-mueller-team-officials-found-after-discovery-anti-trump-messages.html
bblhead672
12-07-2017, 12:26
I can already read the headlines "FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were extremely careless, but committed no crimes nor did they act in any way other than completely unbiased."
The Reaper
12-07-2017, 12:44
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Peregrino
12-07-2017, 15:41
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
The foxes; after all "it's only a henhouse".
Trapper John
12-10-2017, 08:07
It should be very, very clear now just how close we came to losing our constitutional republic:
Political use of the IRS
Political use of the DoJ, FBI, Intel agencies
Use of the media as a political propaganda arm
Not to mention the politicization of the GO corps in the military and marginalization of the legislative branch and politicization of the judicial branch.
All is coming to the light of day and battle lines are drawn. 2018 will be a pivotal year in the battle for the future of our constitutional republic.
Dean Jarvis
12-10-2017, 09:47
It should be very, very clear now just how close we came to losing our constitutional republic
This fight ain't over yet. I'm extremely disappointed with Jeff Sessions and the new FBI director. They seem to be falling in step with the deep state. All Sessions seems to be able to focus on is MS 13 and the sanctuary cities.
Only the government would transfer Strozok who is having an affair with a colleague to head up the HR department. :munchin
Trapper John
12-10-2017, 10:20
This fight ain't over yet. I'm extremely disappointed with Jeff Sessions and the new FBI director. They seem to be falling in step with the deep state. All Sessions seems to be able to focus on is MS 13 and the sanctuary cities.
Only the government would transfer Strozok who is having an affair with a colleague to head up the HR department. :munchin
Yeah, Dean, I'm with ya on that assessment. But, lately I have been trying to see the bigger picture and understand what may be a strategy that is in play. So excuse me while I adjust my tin foil hat. :o
Jeff Sessions is a place holder. Roy Moore wins his former seat. Roy Moore is under siege by the US Senate (McConnell & company), Moore resigns his seat, Sessions agrees to leave DoJ, AL governor appoints Sessions to his old seat. Rudy Giuliani is appointed to AG. Let the games begin! :D
Moore's team discredits his accusers. It's now open season on McConnell and the swamp critters in Congress.
Badger52
12-10-2017, 18:44
This fight ain't over yet. I'm extremely disappointed with Jeff Sessions and the new FBI director. They seem to be falling in step with the deep state. All Sessions seems to be able to focus on is MS 13 and the sanctuary cities.
Only the government would transfer Strozok who is having an affair with a colleague to head up the HR department. :munchin
Completely agree. These people have a lot of marbles at risk and, like Klinton, will not stop until the threat is completely eliminated. There are no longer really 2 parties, and what's left has no allegiance to rule of law.
this all looks like a giant cluster fuck - but it could be worse - it could be neat and clean
now for a moment - think of how neat and clean all of this would look if President HRC was in charge
and think about why
rubberneck
12-10-2017, 21:40
Rudy Giuliani is appointed to AG. Let the games begin! :D
Moore's team discredits his accusers. It's now open season on McConnell and the swamp critters in Congress.
I hope that gun grabber doesn’t get anywhere close to the AG job.
It should be very, very clear now just how close we came to losing our constitutional republic:
Political use of the IRS
Political use of the DoJ, FBI, Intel agencies
Use of the media as a political propaganda arm
Not to mention the politicization of the GO corps in the military and marginalization of the legislative branch and politicization of the judicial branch.
All is coming to the light of day and battle lines are drawn. 2018 will be a pivotal year in the battle for the future of our constitutional republic.
How close we came? We're still headed down that same path.
I agree 100%
We aren't just 'headed' down that path my friend - we are HURTLING down that path.
but
...if HRC had taken the office, it would be happening behind closed doors. Much of the current media circus is because the left had no choice but to reveal themselves when they launched their attacks on the POTUS.
Does anyone think we would know about the sexual harassment congressional bribery fund if HRC was in office? Would there be any widespread public knowledge of the Uranium-1 scandal if HRC was in office? Would the American people have seen how absolutely full of shit the leftist media REALLY IS. For fuck sake - they deify and memorialize folks by giving them a "Pulitzer Prize" - an award named for the man who gave birth to 'Yellow Journalism' - a man that literally allowed his journalistic propaganda to drag the nation into the Spanish American War. Now, the descendant news media is in bed with the DOJ/FBI in a desperate attempt to drag the nation into chaos again, hiding under the cloak of "First amendment free speech".
...for the ratings
It's upsetting that the current POTUS has transformed the US political landscape into a reality TV show but it is necessary - regular politics was not working for us. Regular politics empowered and glorified the likes of Clinton, Conyers, Frankenstein, McCain, Gibson, Flake, Collins, et al....
If you want to uncover sensationalism in government, you need a sensationalist to make it happen.
I don't trust the DoJ/FBI any further than I can throw my pick-up truck. I have only one expectation if ANY agent of a US law enforcement agency shows up at my house - theyare either delivering bad news or coming to try and take away my freedoms.
These people are not trying to destroy the government - they are trying to transform the government into something more palatable to their preferred level of corruption. What they are seeking to destroy are your individual and collective freedoms.
...that's just my opinion, I could be wrong
Trapper John
12-11-2017, 09:57
ENTIRE POST
:lifter Well stated!!
rsdengler
12-11-2017, 11:52
I agree 100%
We aren't just 'headed' down that path my friend - we are HURTLING down that path.
...that's just my opinion, I could be wrong
LOL...What He Said...always well stated and too the point (even if it is on their heads).....:D
And now we find out that Ohr's wife worked for Fusion GPS.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/11/wife-demoted-doj-official-worked-for-firm-behind-anti-trump-dossier.html
Team Sergeant
12-11-2017, 16:44
And now we find out that Ohr's wife worked for Fusion GPS.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/11/wife-demoted-doj-official-worked-for-firm-behind-anti-trump-dossier.html
Beat me to it.
This left-wing corruption is getting deeper and deeper.
Let me know when the shooting starts........
Dean Jarvis
12-11-2017, 18:14
Right now the Deep State are looking at each other and saying Who's Fucking Idea Was This Anyway?
Trapper John
12-11-2017, 19:48
Right now the Deep State are looking at each other and saying Who's Fucking Idea Was This Anyway?
Good point. It will be interesting to see how they cover this up and who becomes the "Al Franken".
Need to modify my earlier post in light of the probable loss by Moore and narrowing of the republican majority coupled with the emergence of the Trump accusers. Looks like an impeachment strategy is looming for 2018.
Also looks as if McCain is going to be implicated, at least by association, in the legitimizing the Trump Dossier as an intel document.
All things considered, even this "glass half full" guy is finding it hard to find the pony in this growing shit pile.
Trapper John
12-11-2017, 19:51
Beat me to it.
This left-wing corruption is getting deeper and deeper.
Let me know when the shooting starts........
TS, over the years, I have come to be singularly impressed with your instincts. This is another example where, I am afraid, you are correct again. :eek:
I’m leaving the country for a few weeks while they sort it out. I need a dose of reality. I going to the third world where at least they are honest about the things they do......
Old Dog New Trick
12-11-2017, 20:16
Yeah TJ is back from his sabbatical.
Oh and I’m loving this whole Meuller investigation. Best idea the Dems have come up with for a long long time.
New Merriam Webster definition of ‘collusion’ coming out next year: noun: self inflicted act of stupidity. verb: shooting oneself at point blank range in the foot.
Even J. (Janet) Edgar Hoover would approve of the overarching debauchery the FBI has sunken too.
Old Dog New Trick
12-11-2017, 20:22
I’m leaving the country for a few weeks while they sort it out. I need a dose of reality. I going to the third world where at least they are honest about the things they do......
Be safe brother, the bodies down there are either hung up like a trophy or never found again.
Something the Klint0ns’ haven’t had to worry about before.
Trapper John
12-11-2017, 20:46
ODNT Yeah TJ is back from his sabbatical. Needed to focus on business for a while to pay the bills.
And I really needed to check-in on youse guys! It's cathartic! :D
"I can protect this country at many levels."
~Peter Strzok
:eek:
...many levels...
Between Lois Lerner at IRS...FBI, DOJ...requests for the unmasking of political opponents...looking more and more like Obama's holdovers and Klinton acolytes are really the folks who need investigating...buckle up.
The FBI’s Trump ‘Insurance’
More troubling evidence of election meddling at the bureau.
By The WSJ Editorial Board
Dec. 13, 2017 7:22 p.m. ET
Democrats and the media are accusing anyone who criticizes special counsel Robert Mueller as Trumpian conspirators trying to undermine his probe. But who needs critics when Mr. Mueller’s team is doing so much to undermine its own credibility?
Wednesday’s revelations—they’re coming almost daily—include the Justice Department’s release of 2016 text messages to and from Peter Strzok, the FBI counterintelligence agent whom Mr. Mueller demoted this summer. The texts, which he exchanged with senior FBI lawyer Lisa Page, contain expletive-laced tirades against Mr. Trump. Such Trump hatred is no surprise and not by itself disqualifying. More troubling are texts that suggest that some FBI officials may have gone beyond antipathy to anti-Trump plotting.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Mr. Strzok wrote Ms. Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 text. He added: “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
What “policy” would that be? The “Andy” in question is Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director. FBI officials are allowed to have political opinions, but what kind of action were they discussing that would amount to anti-Trump “insurance”?
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Mr. Strzok wrote Ms. Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 text. He added: “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
What “policy” would that be? The “Andy” in question is Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director. FBI officials are allowed to have political opinions, but what kind of action were they discussing that would amount to anti-Trump “insurance”?
In another exchange that month, Ms. Page forwarded a Trump-related article and wrote: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.” He thanked her and assured: “Of course I’ll try and approach it that way.” Mr. Strzok, recall, is the man who changed the words “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in James Comey’s July 2016 public exoneration of Hillary Clinton’s emails.
The McCabe meeting came on the heels of the FBI’s launch of its counterintelligence probe into Trump-Russia ties. July is also when former British spook Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on his Clinton-financed dossier of salacious allegations against Mr. Trump. The texts explain why Mr. Mueller would remove Mr. Strzok, though a straight shooter wouldn’t typically resist turning those messages over to Congress for as long as Mr. Mueller did.
Meanwhile, we’re learning more about the political motives of Mr. Mueller’s lieutenant, Andrew Weissmann. Judicial Watch last week released an email in which Mr. Weissmann expressed his “awe” and praise for Sally Yates, after the then acting AG and Obama holdover refused to implement Mr. Trump’s travel ban.
This should trouble anyone who cares about the integrity of the Justice Department. Ms. Yates had every right to resign at the time if she felt she couldn’t implement Mr. Trump’s order. But she had no authority as an executive branch official to defy a legitimate presidential order. Mr. Weissmann’s support for her insubordination was a declaration that he is part of the “resistance.” This should be unacceptable in a ranking FBI official, much less someone charged with conducting a fair-minded investigation.
Public confidence isn’t helped by the continuing Justice and FBI refusal to cooperate with Congress. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who supervises Mr. Mueller, toed the Mueller-FBI line on Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee. He repeated FBI Director Christopher Wray’s preposterous excuse that he can’t answer questions because of an Inspector General probe. And he wouldn’t elaborate on the news that Nellie Ohr, the wife of senior Justice official Bruce Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS, which hired Mr. Steele to gin up his dossier.
The man who should be most disturbed by all this is Mr. Mueller, who wants his evidence and conclusions to be credible with the public. Evidence is building instead that some officials at the FBI—who have worked for him—may have interfered in an American presidential election. Congress needs to insist on its rights as a co-equal branch of government to discover the truth.
Appeared in the December 14, 2017, print edition.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbis-trump-insurance-1513210929?shareToken=stfa890adcc1ac4241ab907c9fa7 a4f427&reflink=article_email_share
Badger52
12-14-2017, 10:14
Patient presents being backed up with a variety of internal energy-depriving parasites. Rx: Flush, from both ends, till clear.
Trapper John
12-14-2017, 12:06
tonyz, Peter Strzok, the FBI counterintelligence agent tells me a lot. A favorite MO for CI is to first set out false or misleading information (i.e. Russians interfered in the electoral process) to set a narrative and follow that with cherry picked real information along with false (Trump campaign colluded with Russians) information that appears to support the preconceived conclusion.
It is clear to me that the Fusion GPS opposition research piece (Trump Dossier) was dressed up to look like an intel assessment (this was actually how it was presented to McCain) and was used to attain a FISA warrant. All of this was the "insurance policy" should that menace, Donald Trump, actually be elected.
No way to describe this other than an attempted coup IMHO.
GITMO my ass.
GITMO is too good for these people - they should be fed to the pigs.
It's gonna take a lot of rope to fix this mess they way it should be fixed.
TOMAHAWK9521
12-14-2017, 16:09
It's gonna take a lot of rope to fix this mess they way it should be fixed.
We're going to need several acres of tilled soil around that ol' tree in order to soak up all that liquid fertilizer.
Team Sergeant
12-14-2017, 16:42
Democratic COUP attempt foiled.
So, let me get this straight.
The Democratic Party aka the “Progressive (socialist) Party”, orders a very fake Russian Collusion intel paper from socialist civilian operatives some of whom are married/related to Deep State Moles within the DoJ and FBI.
These Progressive Party actors then take the Fake Russian Collusion intel paper for action, informing the world that the “Right-Wing” is in fact dirty and they are setting up “Special Investigators” (More Progressive Deep State Moles) to get to the bottom of the Fake Russian Collusion intel.
As this “investigation” by Progressive Deep State Moles continues there are “leaks” and cracks start to form almost immediately. Leaks that show the Russian Collusion intel paper is very fake indeed, that it was ordered by the democratic-progressive party to attempt to show the sitting administration is dirty and requires impeachment. Mole after socialist party mole is then ferreted out and their part in the Democratic COUP attempt revealed.
And it continues.
This is called a conspiracy, a COUP attempt.
And is now out in the open. In many countries the conspirators would be dealt with swiftly and decisively.
And people wonder why the Democratic-Progressive-Socialist party demands gun control................:munchin
miclo18d
12-14-2017, 16:42
tonyz, tells me a lot. A favorite MO for CI is to first set out false or misleading information (i.e. Russians interfered in the electoral process) to set a narrative and follow that with cherry picked real information along with false (Trump campaign colluded with Russians) information that appears to support the preconceived conclusion.
It is clear to me that the Fusion GPS opposition research piece (Trump Dossier) was dressed up to look like an intel assessment (this was actually how it was presented to McCain) and was used to attain a FISA warrant. All of this was the "insurance policy" should that menace, Donald Trump, actually be elected.
No way to describe this other than an attempted coup IMHO.
The best explanation I’ve heard to date!
Occam’s Razor!
Badger52
12-14-2017, 19:00
There it is right there. Why are they not up for treason? And it would successfully be prosecuted by...?
GITMO my ass.
GITMO is too good for these people - they should be fed to the pigs.They could make a post-mortem appearance in GG. Hey, cbtengr, is it time for a renderin' ?
:cool:
Trapper John
12-14-2017, 19:15
And it would successfully be prosecuted by...?
Very good question Badger52. IMO, this rises to a new level we have never seen in modern US history. Perhaps the legal eagles here can advise as to how this would be prosecuted. I am sure their is a prescribed process, just ignorant of what that might be.
Not withstanding the legal process, I would like to jump to the outcome and ask do we still use firing squads? Seriously, this rises to that level as far as I am concerned.
Badger52
12-14-2017, 19:23
Very good question Badger52. IMO, this rises to a new level we have never seen in modern US history. Perhaps the legal eagles her can advise as to how this would be prosecuted. I am sure their is a prescribed process, just ignorant of what that might be.
Not withstanding the legal process, I would like to jump to the outcome and ask do we still use firing squads? Seriously, this rises to that level as far as I am concerned.You're on it sir. I was less curious about the mechanics of it & more about the who would do it - hence your leap to the outcome. Dunno about firing squad though; to me that's for a more honorable thing. The rope might be more appropriate or, perhaps invoke MR2's previous idea. Guillotine - because at this level it's gonna be about throughput.
Democratic COUP attempt foiled.
So, let me get this straight.
The Democratic Party aka the “Progressive (socialist) Party”, orders a very fake Russian Collusion intel paper from socialist civilian operatives some of whom are married/related to Deep State Moles within the DoJ and FBI.
These Progressive Party actors then take the Fake Russian Collusion intel paper for action, informing the world that the “Right-Wing” is in fact dirty and they are setting up “Special Investigators” (More Progressive Deep State Moles) to get to the bottom of the Fake Russian Collusion intel.
As this “investigation” by Progressive Deep State Moles continues there are “leaks” and cracks start to form almost immediately. Leaks that show the Russian Collusion intel paper is very fake indeed, that it was ordered by the democratic-progressive party to attempt to show the sitting administration is dirty and requires impeachment. Mole after socialist party mole is then ferreted out and their part in the Democratic COUP attempt revealed.
And it continues.
This is called a conspiracy, a COUP attempt.
And is now out in the open. In many countries the conspirators would be dealt with swiftly and decisively.
And people wonder why the Democratic-Progressive-Socialist party demands gun control................:munchin
Has the coup failed or is this merely the intermission between acts?
Hillary Klinton is above the law.
They (Justice Dept) was reportedly handing out immunity like candy to former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan...that immunity should be rescinded.
Judicial Watch: State Department Made Deal with Hillary Clinton to Keep Call Log, Schedules Secret
DECEMBER 14, 2017
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new U.S. Department of State documents showing former Secretary Hillary Clinton and her then-Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin were permitted to remove electronic and physical records under a claim they were “personal” materials and “unclassified, non-record materials,” including files of Clinton’s calls and schedules, which were not to be made public. The documents show the Obama State Department records would not be “released to the general public under FOIA.”
The new records also show that Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Documents.”
Judicial Watch obtained the reports about the records from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:
Any and all DS-1904 (Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials) forms completed by, or on behalf of, any of the following individuals:
Former Secretary Hillary Clinton
Former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills
Former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin
Former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan
The documents include a list of official and personal calls and schedules that Clinton removed, which carry a special notation that the documents were not to be made public records. The notation is on an addendum to a DS-1904 signed by Clarence N. Finney Jr., then-director of the Office of Correspondence and Records, who was the reviewing officer. (Judicial Watch has a pending request for the deposition of Finney in separate litigation concerning Clinton emails and the Benghazi terrorist attack.):
NOTE: The Secretary’s call log, grid and schedules are not classified, however, they would not be released to the general public under FOIA. They are being released to the Secretary with this understanding. [Emphasis in original]
***
Electronic copy of “daily files” – which are word versions of public documents and non-records: speeches/press statements/photos from the website, a non-record copy of the schedule, a non record copy of the call log, press clips, and agenda of daily activities
Electronic copy of a log of calls the Secretary made since 2004, it is a non-record, since her official calls are logged elsewhere (official schedule and official call log)
Electronic copy of the Secretary’s “call grid” which is a running list of calls she wants to make (both personal and official)
16 boxes: Personal Schedules (1993 thru 2008-prior to the Secretary’s tenure at the Department of State.
29 boxes: Miscellaneous Public Schedules during her tenure as FLOTUS and Senator-prior to the Secretary’s tenure at the Department of State
1 box: Personal Reimbursable receipts (6/25/2009 thru 1/14/2013)
1 box: Personal Photos
1 box: Personal schedule (2009-2013)
The originals of some Clinton documents were retained, such as the call logs and schedules. For other records, including material that predates Clinton’s tenure, there is no indication that a copy was made. The most significant of these are her personal correspondence and gift binders, which could reflect Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative ties.
Through its previous investigations Judicial Watch made public numerous examples of Clinton’s schedule being broadcast via email through her unsecure, non-government server (for example, see here, here, here and here.)
The records uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain a list of materials removed by Clinton accumulated by Robert Russo, Clinton’s then-special assistant, including PDFs of Clinton’s “correspondence in response to gifts … thank you and acknowledgements,” as well as other records.
The documents indicate that Clinton removed a physical file of “the log of the Secretary’s gifts with pictures of gifts.”
The receipt of gifts by federal employees in the Executive Branch is regulated:
A “prohibited source” [of gifts] under the regulations is one who seeks official action from the employee’s agency; one who does business or seeks to do business with the agency; one whose activities are regulated by the employee’s agency; one whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s official duties; or an organization a majority of whose members fit any of the above categories.
A gift is given “because of” the employee’s official position if it would not have been offered “had the employee not held the status, authority or duties associated with his Federal position.” Gifts that are “motivated by a family relationship or personal friendship” may therefore be accepted without limitation.
“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-department-made-deal-hillary-clinton-keep-call-log-schedules-secret/
CloseDanger
12-14-2017, 21:13
A timeline from Doug Ross (http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2017/12/a-timeline-of-treason-how-fbi.html)
"06/24/15
Discovery of classified information on Clinton’s private email server announced; the matter is referred to the FBI
Time http://time.com/4774278/james-comey-fired-timeline/
3
07/24/15
State Dept. and other officials make security referral related to classified information possessed by Clinton and associates
WaPo https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/20/timeline-james-comeys-decision-making-on-the-clinton-probe/?utm_term=.0cead386f5ef
4
03/19/16 Hackers gain access to emails of Democrat operative John Podesta CNN http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/14/politics/donald-trump-jr-wikileaks-timeline/index.html
5
04/12/16
Law firm Perkins Coie, using money from the Clinton campaign and DNC, hires Fusion GPS to find incriminating data on Trump
FEC http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/28/finally-a-definitive-timeline-showing-when-clinton-dnc-started-the-russian-dossier/
6
05/02/16
FBI director Comey drafts statement exonerating Clinton before interviewing her or other key witnesses
WaPo https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/20/timeline-james-comeys-decision-making-on-the-clinton-probe/?utm_term=.0cead386f5ef
7
05/03/16 Trump becomes the presumptive Republican nominee for the office of president Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier
8
05/03/16
Clinton IT specialist Paul Combetta admits lying to the FBI about erasing emails using BleachBit but is not charged for the crime
WaPo https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/20/timeline-james-comeys-decision-making-on-the-clinton-probe/?utm_term=.0cead386f5ef
9
05/05/16
Washington Post reports there is ..."
My view from just after Inauguration . I see it all. (https://concisemagazine.wordpress.com/2017/02/16/something-i-do-not-pay-the-intel-community-for-is-sedition/)
Team Sergeant
12-15-2017, 09:23
trea·son
ˈtrēzən/
noun
noun: treason; noun: high treason; plural noun: high treasons
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
se·di·tion
səˈdiSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: sedition; plural noun: seditions
conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
treach·er·y
ˈtreCH(ə)rē/
noun
noun: treachery; plural noun: treacheries
betrayal of trust; deceptive action or nature.
Don't know what else to say except it's long past due to start arresting the criminals.
bblhead672
12-15-2017, 09:34
Perhaps the only "justice" is a series of Klinton-like "unfortunate accidents and tragic suicides."
The Soviets had methods of dealing with traitors and spies:
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-37376130/the-bbc-journalist-assassinated-with-a-poison-tipped-umbrella
IMO, "honorable" leaders are required to be in place if the crimes of treason and sedition are to be claimed.
We haven't had anyone with that trait in a long time. Most of the people who should be calling for those charges have no honor for anything other than themselves.
Team Sergeant
12-15-2017, 09:46
IMO, "honorable" leaders are required to be in place if the crimes of treason and sedition are to be claimed.
We haven't had anyone with that trait in a long time. Most of the people who should be calling for those charges have no honor for anything other than themselves.
If you think honor is or should be a political trait you need to rethink your political view.
If you think honor is or should be a political trait you need to rethink your political view.
I can't think of any reason why honor shouldn't be a trait.
It doesn't exist...but that doesn't negate the fact that it should.
Team Sergeant
12-15-2017, 09:50
Honor is nothing more than the ability to look directly into the mirror each morning while shaving.
I can't think of any reason why honor shouldn't be a trait.
It doesn't exist...but that doesn't negate the fact that it should.
Honor is not a trait easily found, needed or respected to actually get ahead in politics or bureaucracy. It is a notion often referred to as someone falls on his or her own sword and is being pushed out the door.
How high and how far did the Klintons and their acolytes rise up the political ladder with absolutely no honor...Obama and his acolytes?
D.C. is a cesspool of too many backslapping, self promoting, holier-than-thou folks who all know better than you and I.
It has been corruption - and the absolute absence of honor - that has gripped and overtaken D.C.
bblhead672
12-15-2017, 11:24
If you think honor is or should be a political trait you need to rethink your political view.
I believe honor left politics as a trait in the late 1700's. Wasn't much talk of sacrificing anyone's "sacred honor" after 1776.
Team Sergeant
12-15-2017, 13:10
Seems the DC Scum are Rising to the surface. Is there no end to this rabbit hole?
Attorney Lisa Bloom sought to line up paydays for women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct: report
Legal powerhouse Lisa Bloom tried to line up big paydays for women who were willing to accuse President Trump of sexual misconduct during the final months of last year’s election, according to an explosive report.
The Hill reported Friday that Bloom worked with campaign donors and tabloid media outlets to arrange compensation for the alleged victims and a commission for herself, offering to sell their stories. In one case, Bloom reportedly arranged for a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempted to score a six-figure payment for another woman. The former ultimately declined to come forward after being offered $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The Hill cited contract documents, emails and text messages it obtained -- including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that referred to pro-Hillary Clinton political action committees.
Bloom, who is the daughter of famous attorney Gloria Allred and, like her mother, specializes in representing women in sexual harassment cases, worked for four women who were considering accusing Trump. Two went public, and two declined.
Bloom did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Fox News.
In a statement to The Hill, Bloom acknowledged trying to get her clients paid, but said the payments were to help the women stay safe, and in some cases relocate.
“Donors reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I represented,” Bloom said.
Bloom, who has also represented accused sexual harasser Harvey Weinstein, in addition to women who've accusing Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly, acknowledged her standard terms require clients to pay her commissions, which may be as high as 33 percent if she sells their stories to media outlets.
Bloom told The Hill she had no contact with Clinton or her campaign.
The Hill spoke to makeup artist Jill Harth, who filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, accusing him of pushing her up against a wall at his Mar-a-Lago estate and groping her. Although she withdrew the suit, nearly 20 years later, the litigation resurfaced during the presidential campaign and Harth was thrust into the spotlight. She asked Bloom to represent her after Trump denied her accusations.
“I consider myself lucky to have had Lisa Bloom by my side after my old lawsuit resurfaced. She advised me with great competence and compassion,” Harth told The Hill.
cont:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/15/attorney-lisa-bloom-sought-to-line-up-paydays-for-women-accusing-trump-sexual-misconduct-report.html
Ret10Echo
12-15-2017, 13:40
Seems the DC Scum are Rising to the surface. Is there no end to this rabbit hole?
It's just how business is done inside the beltway. Nothing exceptional here
Old Dog New Trick
12-15-2017, 13:54
Gloria Aldred + Lisa Bloom = “collusion” :munchin
Dean Jarvis
12-15-2017, 15:08
If you think honor is or should be a political trait you need to rethink your political view.
We may be way past that attribute but what happened to: "I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic"?
I've heard Nuwt Gingrich and other prominent individuals that are going so far as to say that this nation is as divided as we were during the Civil War.
I'm not sure how this Shit Sandwich is going to end but it's going to be ugly. We're looking at something that is going to get way worse before it gets better.
Badger52
12-15-2017, 17:28
Gloria Aldred + Lisa Bloom = “collusion” :munchinLike Mother Like Daughter
Like Mother Like Daughter
The turd doesn't fall far from the asshole.
Surf n Turf
12-15-2017, 18:40
Very good question Badger52. IMO, this rises to a new level we have never seen in modern US history. Perhaps the legal eagles here can advise as to how this would be prosecuted. I am sure their is a prescribed process, just ignorant of what that might be.
Not withstanding the legal process, I would like to jump to the outcome and ask do we still use firing squads? Seriously, this rises to that level as far as I am concerned.
Trapper,
If a half dozen were selected, and sent on ahead to meet Jesus, Ya' think the rest of the congregation would start singing "closer my God to thee". :rolleyes:
SnT
Badger52
12-15-2017, 19:24
^ Pour Encourager Les Autres...
As in "kill the chicken, scare the monkey."
Team Sergeant
12-15-2017, 19:49
It comforting to know that females can also be the bottom-feeding scumbags of the world.
Welcome to the new "Progressive" Feminism
Bombshell: Lisa Bloom Sought 6-Figure Payoffs for Donald Trump Accusers
by John Nolte15 Dec 2017
Left-wing feminist attorney Lisa Bloom, who represented two of the women who made sexual harassment allegations against President Trump during the 2016 campaign, sought payoffs as high as six figures for her clients, according to the Hill.
From the beginning, Trump has denied any and all wrongdoing. Moreover, he has argued that the allegations were part of an overall plot to personally destroy his candidacy with lies.
The Hill obtained contracts and text messages that show Bloom sought to sell the stories of alleged victims to television outlets; one proposed deal included an offer of $750,000 to a woman who eventually declined to come forward. Bloom also sought to convince a donor to pay off the mortgage of a woman who did come forward.
“The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages,” the Hill reports, adding that this included “an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.”
cont:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/15/bombshell-lisa-bloom-sought-6-figure-payoffs-trump-accusers/
Surf n Turf
12-15-2017, 20:22
FBI officials’ text message about Hillary Clinton said to be a cover story for romantic affair
Washington Post ^ | Dec 16, 2017 | Devlin Barrett
People familiar with the matter said that, although Page’s message may appear to suggest that she and Strzok used a separate communications channel for discussing the Clinton case, the point of her text was to advise Strzok how to explain to his wife why the two of them had been texting each other.
Page and Strzok used their work on the Clinton case as a cover story for the affair, these people said, adding that there was not a separate set of phones for untraceable discussions of the Clinton case. The text had nothing to do with the Clinton investigation, these people said.
Behind a Pay Wall
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-officials-text-message-about-hillary-clinton-said-to-be-a-cover-story-for-romantic-affair/2017/12/15/23205bee-e1b6-11e7-bbd0-9dfb2e37492a_story.html?utm_term=.c9abc472a267
I was going to say "how stupid do they think we are..... We already know
That’s as implausible as the “just doing research” excuse for illegal porn.
SnT
In one case, Bloom reportedly arranged for a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempted to score a six-figure payment for another woman. The former ultimately declined to come forward after being offered $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
That is a lot of money. I wonder where that money would have come from...
Surf n Turf
12-15-2017, 20:33
And the Hits just keep a'comin'
SnT
WSJ via Townhall: There's Mounting Evidence of 2016 Election Meddling Coming From the FBI
There is something rotten at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I mean all of this is just absurd. We have two FBI agents texting one another, one of which is having an extramarital affair with the other, cryptically talking about “insurance” against a Trump presidency. That text between these two agents was delivered on August 15, 2016. You also have Andrew Weissmann, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s top lieutenant, voicing praise for then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to enact President Trump’s executive order on immigration, which got her fired. Then, there’s another DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, who was demoted for meeting the authors of the infamous and unverified Trump dossier, Fusion GPS; Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked for that firm during the 2016 election. If there is nothing rotten at the FBI, then it’s credibility is definitely in question, something that The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board mentioned in their op-ed about this mess. The two FBI agents at the center of the firestorm right now, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are obviously no longer working with Mueller; Strzok was removed in August, while Page’s assignment with the investigation has already ended and she has been transferred elsewhere. Still, from this past summer to now—and we’re just learning about these 10,000 text messages between the two. The Journal makes it clear that there appears to be mounting evidence of election meddling emanating from the bureau:
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Mr. Strzok wrote Ms. Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 text. He added: “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
What “policy” would that be? The “Andy” in question is Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director. FBI officials are allowed to have political opinions, but what kind of action were they discussing that would amount to anti-Trump “insurance”?
In another exchange that month, Ms. Page forwarded a Trump-related article and wrote: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.” He thanked her and assured: “Of course I’ll try and approach it that way.” Mr. Strzok, recall, is the man who changed the words “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in James Comey’s July 2016 public exoneration of Hillary Clinton’s emails.
The McCabe meeting came on the heels of the FBI’s launch of its counterintelligence probe into Trump-Russia ties. July is also when former British spook Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on his Clinton-financed dossier of salacious allegations against Mr. Trump. The texts explain why Mr. Mueller would remove Mr. Strzok, though a straight shooter wouldn’t typically resist turning those messages over to Congress for as long as Mr. Mueller did.Meanwhile, we’re learning more about the political motives of Mr. Mueller’s lieutenant, Andrew Weissmann. Judicial Watch last week released an email in which Mr. Weissmann expressed his “awe” and praise for Sally Yates, after the then acting AG and Obama holdover refused to implement Mr. Trump’s travel ban.
This should trouble anyone who cares about the integrity of the Justice Department.[…]
Public confidence isn’t helped by the continuing Justice and FBI refusal to cooperate with Congress. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who supervises Mr. Mueller, toed the Mueller-FBI line on Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee. He repeated FBI Director Christopher Wray’s preposterous excuse that he can’t answer questions because of an Inspector General probe. And he wouldn’t elaborate on the news that Nellie Ohr, the wife of senior Justice official Bruce Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS, which hired Mr. Steele to gin up his dossier.
The man who should be most disturbed by all this is Mr. Mueller, who wants his evidence and conclusions to be credible with the public. Evidence is building instead that some officials at the FBI—who have worked for him—may have interfered in an American presidential election.
So, again, what’s the insurance policy? Is it the dossier that contains salacious and unverified information about Trump, something that Katie pointed out in her post? Or, as it seems, is it the FBI investigation into Russian interference in July. Did they hope to find actual evidence of collusion to nail Trump if he were to become president? Strzok was an agent with the counter-intelligence wing of the bureau. Whatever the case, it seems that meddling, or at least conversation of such activities, is coming from inside the house, or to be more accurate—inside the J. Edgar Hoover Building and not the Kremlin. Judicial Watch just filed a FOIA lawsuit to obtain all of Peter Strzok’s files relating to his reassignment from the Russia investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/12/15/wsj-theres-mounting-evidence-of-election-meddling-coming-from-the-fbi-n2422639
Old Dog New Trick
12-15-2017, 21:49
I know this is going sound like my tin foil hat is too small but you watch.
FBI Agent says there was an FBI cover-up in the Bundy Ranch Stand-Off -
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-investigations/2017/12/15/federal-agent-alleges-u-s-misconduct-bundy-ranch-standoff/956525001/
And wait for the Maluer range stand-off to be added to the conspiracy of the FBI under Dir. Comey and Loretta Lynch to come out.
FBI officials’ text message about Hillary Clinton said to be a cover story for romantic affair
Washington Post ^ | Dec 16, 2017 | Devlin Barrett
People familiar with the matter said that, although Page’s message may appear to suggest that she and Strzok used a separate communications channel for discussing the Clinton case, the point of her text was to advise Strzok how to explain to his wife why the two of them had been texting each other.
Page and Strzok used their work on the Clinton case as a cover story for the affair, these people said, adding that there was not a separate set of phones for untraceable discussions of the Clinton case. The text had nothing to do with the Clinton investigation, these people said.
Behind a Pay Wall
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-officials-text-message-about-hillary-clinton-said-to-be-a-cover-story-for-romantic-affair/2017/12/15/23205bee-e1b6-11e7-bbd0-9dfb2e37492a_story.html?utm_term=.c9abc472a267
I was going to say "how stupid do they think we are..... We already know
That’s as implausible as the “just doing research” excuse for illegal porn.
SnT
Lol, what's next...they'll tell GMA that they even voted for Trump.
Rooskies, FBI, election meddling, at this time, what difference does it make?
Team Sergeant
12-16-2017, 09:34
It is however taking the MSM forever to make the leap that the DNC, obama, clinton along with state actors, elements of the FBI, DoJ, IRS and State Dept did in fact conspire to rig the 2016 election, target President Trump in an attempted bloodless COUP and continue to target President Trump by paying for sexual accusations.
When the bodies start hitting the floor the socialist DNC, FBI, DoJ, State Dept, IRS etc has no one to blame but themselves.
Gregg Jarrett: Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down Trump?
By Gregg Jarrett | Fox News
There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.
Such a Machiavellian scheme would move well beyond what is known as the “deep state,” a popular reference to government employees who organize in secret to impose their own political views on government policy in defiance of democratically elected leadership.
However, this apparent plot to keep Trump from becoming president and to weaken and potentially pave the way for his impeachment with a prolonged politically motivated investigation – if proven – would constitute something far more nefarious and dangerous.
Such a plot would show that partisans within the FBI and the Justice Department, driven by personal animus and a sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously conspired to subvert electoral democracy itself in our country.
As of now, we have no proof beyond a reasonable doubt of such a plot. But we have very strong circumstantial evidence.
And as the philosopher and writer Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal in 1850: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”
Newly revealed text messages about the apparent anti-Trump plot are the equivalent of a trout in the milk. It smells fishy.
cont:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/15/gregg-jarrett-did-fbi-and-justice-department-plot-to-clear-hillary-clinton-bring-down-trump.html
Trapper John
12-16-2017, 10:06
Trapper,
If a half dozen were selected, and sent on ahead to meet Jesus, Ya' think the rest of the congregation would start singing "closer my God to thee". :rolleyes:
SnT
True, and I recognize that is probably a bad idea. But damn, it does send a strong message and one i would like to be sent.
Probably a good thing I don't make these kinds of decisions. :D
Trapper John
12-16-2017, 10:13
It is however taking the MSM forever to make the leap that the DNC, obama, clinton along with state actors, elements of the FBI, DoJ, IRS and State Dept did in fact conspire to rig the 2016 election, target President Trump in an attempted bloodless COUP and continue to target President Trump by paying for sexual accusations.
When the bodies start hitting the floor the socialist DNC, FBI, DoJ, State Dept, IRS etc has no one to blame but themselves.
Gregg Jarrett: Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down Trump?
By Gregg Jarrett | Fox News
There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.
Such a Machiavellian scheme would move well beyond what is known as the “deep state,” a popular reference to government employees who organize in secret to impose their own political views on government policy in defiance of democratically elected leadership.
However, this apparent plot to keep Trump from becoming president and to weaken and potentially pave the way for his impeachment with a prolonged politically motivated investigation – if proven – would constitute something far more nefarious and dangerous.
Such a plot would show that partisans within the FBI and the Justice Department, driven by personal animus and a sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously conspired to subvert electoral democracy itself in our country.
As of now, we have no proof beyond a reasonable doubt of such a plot. But we have very strong circumstantial evidence.
And as the philosopher and writer Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal in 1850: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”
Newly revealed text messages about the apparent anti-Trump plot are the equivalent of a trout in the milk. It smells fishy.
cont:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/15/gregg-jarrett-did-fbi-and-justice-department-plot-to-clear-hillary-clinton-bring-down-trump.html
Yep!! Not many things anger me as much as this! Let me know if they start taking volunteers for the firing squads! ;)
Team Sergeant
12-16-2017, 10:48
When government agencies have become so corrupt they can no longer carry out the laws of the land then beware the Lone Wolf.
This unprecedented level of treason, sedition, treachery and conspiracy should not go unanswered.
And if anyone ever wondered why the Department of Homeland Security under the piglet janet napolitano reported that:
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.
They have been afraid of us for decades, they being the corrupt left-wing rouge elements that plan to overthrow this country and its constitution by the use of treason, sedition, treachery and conspiracy.
They do not fear the FBI, DoJ, State Dept, IRS etc and now we know why.
They do however fear the Lone Wolf. And if I were one of the state actors involved in this conspiracy I’d be sleeping in bullet proof vest.
And yes, one man, one bolt action rifle and three rounds can still change the course of history. (And some wonder why the left-wing demands gun control.)
Old Dog New Trick
12-17-2017, 00:19
This whole thing, the entire 2016 election is turning into exactly what Trump said it was.
RIGGED!
Only that Shirllary lost what must have cost them more than all the money and insider favors they had.
If people (many people) inside Washington DC and elsewhere don’t go to jail (or better yet charged with treason, sedition - both executable offenses) for the corruption instigated to derail a free and democratic election...
It’s time for the people to scrap the current system; As allowed by our Constitution.
Beyond the illegal FISA warrants, moles within trusted agencies, and complete violations of protected documents and communications being used to conduct a which hunt of the winning party, the level at which has never been done or seen before. (This makes Watergate look like Kindergarten, and Hillary Rodham learned well before being kicked off the team that did the legal work to force a sitting president to resign.)
Let’s forget the fact that Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a despicable person she is a criminal walking free from the same, the exact same people leading this witch hunt.
When the shooting starts it will be necessary and righteous, and a course correction desperately needed to save the country.
all enemies, foreign and domestic
Its a part of the oath of office that clearly means different things to different people.
Team Sergeant
12-17-2017, 15:04
Someone from Fox News is reading Professionalsoldiers.com............... :munchin
Fox News’ Jesse Watters: We May Have an Anti-Trump ‘Coup on Our Hands in America’
by Pam Key17 Dec 2017
Saturday on Fox News Channel’s “Watters’ World,” host Jesse Watters suggested that anti-Trump texts from Peter Strzok and another FBI agent could be proof of “coup” going on in FBI special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe to remove President Donald Trump from office.
Waters said, “The investigation into Donald Trump’s campaign has been crooked from the jump. But the scary part is we may now have proof the investigation was weaponized to destroy his presidency for partisan political purposes and to disenfranchise millions of American voters. Now, if that’s true, we have a coup on our hands in America.”
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/12/17/fox-news-jesse-watters-may-anti-trump-coup-hands-america/
TOMAHAWK9521
12-17-2017, 15:20
I'd like to see Jesse Watters, Fox, Breitbart and Project Veritas push that over and over into everyone's conversations, much like George Snuffaluffagus did with inventing of the War on Women mantra. But unlike Snuffy's bogus claim, the evidence of this ongoing coup is becoming more and more visible to the public as layer after layer of this rotten onion gets peeled back.
Dean Jarvis
12-17-2017, 16:05
Its a part of the oath of office that clearly means different things to different people.
I'm too naïve and old school to have thought of it that way. Clearly we are living at a time when we are in real jeopardy of losing the constitution, freedom and our history.
The question is, should truth and justice not prevail as we watch this going forward, what do we do about it? Is this the hill we'll choose to die on?
The greatest stories that any investigative reporter could ever hope to have in their lifetimes are being ignored because of their bias and hatred of Trump. It is going to be up to the voters who put Trump in office to vote for like minded individuals in office in the coming years and to remove the entrenched good old boys that reside in office now. The non Trump supporting so called Republicans should be quaking at the thought of being purged.
The non Trump supporting so called Republicans should be quaking at the thought of being purged.
Indeed they should, but he has to start purging them for that to occur. I haven't seen much of that as of yet.
Corrupt, incestuous, elites...ready to disarm the populous...and tax them until it crushes motivation and creates powerless serfs.
That movie seems to be replayed every so often.
Badger52
12-17-2017, 18:55
Corrupt, incestuous, elites...ready to disarm the populous...and tax them until it crushes motivation and creates powerless serfs.
That movie seems to be replayed every so often.+1
It's important at times to refrain from dancing around the candor needed. And important to remind others that a 'socialist' is simply a communist that hasn't shown you their gun.... Yet.
+1
It's important at times to refrain from dancing around the candor needed. And important to remind others that a 'socialist' is simply a communist that hasn't shown you their gun.... Yet.
Badger, as you know 535 citizens get to spend $4 trillion+ of our money annually...bound to be some really bad apples in any such group (and their bureaucrat henchmen) when given that kind of money and power.
It's just that with the election of an outsider - the henchmen have shown their hand. The curtain has been drawn back for those who are willing to look.
I hold out hope the we will now hear from those in the know to find out what really went down in Benghazi. The families and the nation deserve to know.
Indeed they should, but he has to start purging them for that to occur. I haven't seen much of that as of yet.
It will take the voters to purge congressmen and senators.
Old Dog New Trick
12-17-2017, 19:42
I keep thinking the best thing to do right now is continue to watch this onion get peeled. While it is certainly causing a lot of tears and is not a Walla Walla sweet onion or an Outback Flower it has to keep going or we will not see what gets uncovered.
Whether there was or was not any undue influence perpetrated by the Trump campaign or family during the election we have to know. As this continues we are seeing the influence of bias and quite possibly criminal actions of the Obama administration, DOJ, FBI, and eventually the intelligence agencies responsible for protecting the country.
The Republicans keep calling for this charade to end but as each day continues we will have to wait for the Democrats to call for an immediate cease and desist order before the whole lid gets blown open on their duplicitous activities. If this witch hunt had never begun we would not be having this discussion and I think we need to be having this discussion.
Trump has already done more good or is trying to do more good for the people of this country than anyone since Reagan. It’s going to be a bumpy ride exposing the corruption inside the beltway and beyond.
I’m waiting for the big shoe to drop and something gets revealed that shows Obama and others in his inner circle committed crimes against the state and subpoenas are issued for grand jury indictments of those officials involved.
Burn it all down!
Then we can act in the best interest of the country.
It will take the voters to purge congressmen and senators.
I know. I'm talking about everyone else that he CAN purge us from!
It will take the voters to purge congressmen and senators.
We are both on the same page ,
We are both on the same page ,
Yes, sir! I figured as much....;):lifter
bblhead672
12-18-2017, 16:14
The FBI’s Secret State Police (http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268750/fbis-secret-state-police-lloyd-billingsley)
Wray talked up the brave men and women of the FBI but left out the way the Russian intelligence had gained influence by corrupting FBI agents. The FBI’s Robert Hanssen, for example, gave thousands of pages of classified material, including U.S. nuclear secrets, to the KGB and its Russian successor agency the SVR. Hanssen pulled this off from 1979 to 2001 and caused enormous damage to the United States.
The FBI’s Richard Miller, a counterintelligence man like Strzok, also sold classified documents to Russian agents. The FBI’s Earl Pitts gave U.S. secrets to the Russians from 1987 until 1992. So when it comes to Russian influence, the FBI is not squeaky clean.
Trapper John
12-18-2017, 20:16
Someone from Fox News is reading Professionalsoldiers.com............... :munchin
I saw that too and was wondering the same thing!
So let's keep pushing this narrative out there! :D
Trapper John
12-18-2017, 20:19
+1
It's important at times to refrain from dancing around the candor needed. And important to remind others that a 'socialist' is simply a communist that hasn't shown you their gun.... Yet.
Agree!
Old Dog New Trick
12-24-2017, 07:03
Duplicate
Old Dog New Trick
12-24-2017, 07:19
No 2 at FBI (“Andy” McCabe) plans to retire soon. Maybe hoping to disappear ‘figuratively’ as opposed to ‘literally’ from the shit storm he is most likely responsible for.
Trump Pounces on Report FBI's Deputy Director Plans to Retire - Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-23/fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-plans-to-retire-soon-wapost-reports?utm_campaign=pol&utm_medium=bd&utm_source=applenews
At the end of this news article former Director Comey had this to say about recently reassigned general counsel James Baker:
“Sadly, we are now at a point in our political life when anyone can be attacked for partisan gain,” Comey wrote late Friday. “James Baker, who is stepping down as FBI General Counsel, served our country incredibly well for 25 years & deserves better. He is what we should all want our public servants to be.”
It’s an interesting choice of words, I’m guessing including his own thoughts of what role he had. That word being “POLITICAL.” You see I’ve spent my entire adult life in some form of an official government capacity, whether as a diplomatic warrior or a federal employee, and the one thing every ‘ethics’ class has reinforced is that to perform my job without bias or undue influence that might be considered ‘unethical’ one must always separate and keep separate ‘political activities’ and remain bias free within the workforce.
It seems the FBI’s most senior leaders and those of several others in the DOJ have forgotten that.
The other interesting point is...”he served his country incredible well for 25 years.”
Well, woopty f$&@ing doo! Apparently he and Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Page all thought, “you can do anything you want on your last day (year) on the job!” Because I don’t care and the public funding your salary and retirement don’t care how many years you remained professional and honorable if on the way out the door you committed treason against your country!
I hope they all get their just rewards. Adjoining cells with the criminal - Hillary Klint0n. Stripping them of retirement benefits would be icing on the cake.
Comey is a clown that has done the very thing he accuses others of doing. He is a hypocrite of the highest order! He needs to go away and remember he is a no-body.