PDA

View Full Version : The Socialist 9th Circuit Court strikes again


Team Sergeant
06-12-2017, 13:33
These morons do not have the best interest of the United States in their court. They are nothing but socialists disguised as "judges". Their power needs to be stripped and they need to be flipping burgers at McDonalds.

islamic/muslin terrorists come from muslim/islamic countries.

When the next islamic terrorist attack occurs in the United States we don't have far to look at who allowed/endorsed it.





9th Circuit rules against Trump travel ban

Published June 12, 2017
Fox News

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday ruled in part against President Trump’s so-called travel ban, upholding an injunction that prevents the administration from enforcing a suspension on travel from six mostly Muslim countries.

"We conclude that the President, in issuing the Executive Order, exceeded the scope of the authority delegated to him by Congress," the opinion said.

The ruling Monday from a unanimous three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals deals the administration another legal defeat as the Supreme Court considers a separate case on the issue.

The judges say the president violated U.S. immigration law by discriminating against people based on their nationality and that Trump failed to show their entry into the country would hurt American interests.

cont:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/12/9th-circuit-rules-against-trump-travel-ban.html

ddoering
06-12-2017, 18:11
So they would probably have let Nazi's in during WW2 using that standard.

Divemaster
06-12-2017, 22:41
If the 9th's opinion is not sound, SCOTUS should be able to dispense with it 5-4.

rsdengler
06-13-2017, 12:12
"The judges say the president violated U.S. immigration law by discriminating against people based on their nationality and that Trump failed to show their entry into the country would hurt American interests. "

So, basically we say "Oh, come on in and we will take our chances"...Please, aren't these country's Iran, Sudan, Syria,Iraq, Libya, South Yemen on the Terrorist Watch List? Hello, the nationality of the modern Islamic Terrorist are not Papua New Guinea Pygmy's. And why is it that Saudi Arabia is not added, they are the most prolific sponsor of international Islamist terrorism. Boggles the mind....:D Time for:

"Ready=Aloha
UP!=Snackbar":lifter

tom kelly
06-14-2017, 03:12
How many of those Judges on the 9th Circuit have been appointed by the former POTUS ? The ultra liberal left are trying to RUIN the USA. In the name of What common sense gun control, "The New World Order" George Soros, their own agenda, WE, THE PEOPLE, HAVE A DUTY TO ELIMINATE THEM... VOTE RIGHT IN 2017 & RID the USA of "The Progressive" Ass wipes,...Tom Kelly

Badger52
06-14-2017, 19:16
If the 9th's opinion is not sound, SCOTUS should be able to dispense with it 5-4.In my view (only) if it goes all the way that should be a different number. Much was made of then-Candidate Trump's public remarks that have been used to show intentional discrimination against a religion, rather than perfectly acceptable use of Executive power.

That argument cuts two ways: If public comments count to show state of mind (online, interviews, writing containing a Y-UUUGE level of vitriol against the candidate, even following inauguration to the now sitting POTUS), then Justice Ruth Ginsburg must recuse herself.*


* not holding breath but I think a US Attorney could bring that argument.

Team Sergeant
06-15-2017, 07:06
In my view (only) if it goes all the way that should be a different number. Much was made of then-Candidate Trump's public remarks that have been used to show intentional discrimination against a religion, rather than perfectly acceptable use of Executive power.

That argument cuts two ways: If public comments count to show state of mind (online, interviews, writing containing a Y-UUUGE level of vitriol against the candidate, even following inauguration to the now sitting POTUS), then Justice Ruth Ginsburg must recuse herself.*


* not holding breath but I think a US Attorney could bring that argument.



Justice Ruth Ginsburg has been dead for two decades........... her mouth just keeps moving.

Badger52
06-15-2017, 09:38
Justice Ruth Ginsburg has been dead for two decades........... her mouth just keeps moving.LOL, true enough. Piga kufa; dead but don't know it yet.

rsdengler
06-15-2017, 11:09
Justice Ruth Ginsburg has been dead for two decades........... her mouth just keeps moving.

Whahhahaaha.....OMG, for some reason I cannot stop laughing at that comment:D Thanks, I now have to clean the water splatter from my computer screen :p