PDA

View Full Version : Clinton's Accept Cash from Nations that Execute Homosexuals


SF-TX
05-16-2016, 21:17
The Clinton's corruption and hypocrisy is boundless. I wonder how the alphabet community of 'victims' will spin this. Never mind. They won't even pay attention. Not until the executioner puts their head on the block.

Hillary’s Latest Scandal: She And Bill Siphoned $100 Mil From Mideast Leaders

Scandal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders. Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly function as our nation’s leader?

The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has uncovered a disturbing pattern of the Clintons’ raising money for the Clinton Foundation from regimes that have checkered records on human rights and that aren’t always operating in the best interests of the U.S. By the way, the $100 million we mentioned above doesn’t appear to include another $30 million given to the Clintons by two Mideast-based foundations and four billionaire Saudis.

All told, it’s a lot of money.

“These regimes are buying access,” Patrick Poole, a national security analyst who regularly writes for PJ Media, told the DCNF. “You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension.”

Well, maybe not, given that Clinton, during her four-year tenure as secretary of state, used a clearly illegal private email server which is now under investigation by the FBI. Her open e-mail system likely was hacked by Chinese, Russian and perhaps other spy agencies, say cyberespionage experts. Such negligence would seem to disqualify her from ever holding a sensitive foreign policy post in the government again.

Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly more serious investigation into possible political corruption involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive, given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way that lines their own pockets.

The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton’s business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took away some $15 million in “guaranteed payments” from the deal, his tax records show.

A picture of extraordinary greed is emerging from both Clintons in the years after they hold the highest posts in the U.S. government.

In just the past three years, after her stint as the nation’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton spoke to dozens of deep-pocket firms on Wall Street, typically charging $250,000 a pop to hear her wit and wisdom — despite her bitter condemnations of Wall Street during her campaign.

All told, she took in an estimated $22 million from these speeches — an extraordinary amount, given the growing consensus among foreign-policy thinkers that Clinton was one of the worst secretaries of state ever.

So why would Arab potentates and Wall Street magnates alike pony up so much money for the Clintons? Is it because they believe so strongly in the philanthropic mission of the Clinton Family Foundation? Or is it that they hoped to have influence on a future Hillary Clinton presidency, which would of course feature First Gentleman Bill Clinton?

Remember, a Hillary Clinton presidency once looked like a sure thing. Now, given the growing possibility that she could be charged for criminal negligence for putting secret material on a private server, or perhaps even be charged with corruption, Clinton has far more serious problems than just getting elected. Her biggest problem may be staying out of prison.

Source (http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hillarys-latest-scandal-she-and-bill-siphoned-100-mil-from-persian-gulf-leaders/)

SF-TX
05-16-2016, 21:23
I doubt many will be shocked by this revelation.

Clinton Scandals: Is The Family’s Charitable Foundation A Fraud?

Corruption: With each new revelation, the murky world of the Clinton family finances only seems to get murkier — and dirtier. And a new report suggests it’s no accident.

We wrote last week about how the Clinton Foundation gathered some $100 million from a variety of Gulf sheikhs and billionaires, not to mention taking in millions of “donations” from private businesses that later benefited from their supposed “charitable” largesse. Some of those who gave big bucks to the Clintons had interests that were, to put it mildly, not in keeping with U.S. interests.

That prompted a key question: Just what do these assorted nations, foreign officials, satraps, global fixers and top corporate execs expect in return for their money?

And now comes a more serious, far-reaching question: Is the entire Clinton Foundation so full of conflicts of interest and questionable dealings that it amounts to little more than a massive fraud intended solely to enrich its presidential namesake and his family?

Continue reading (http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-scandals-is-the-familys-charitable-foundation-a-fraud/)

cbtengr
05-16-2016, 21:26
The MSM is too busy covering Trumps taxes and sexist past to be worried about the Clintons and their slush fund. Come November and her defeat the cash cow is gonna go dry and there is going to be a lot of buyers remorse from all those who cozy'd up to the her and Bill.

SF-TX
05-16-2016, 21:38
The MSM is too busy covering Trumps taxes and sexist past to be worried about the Clintons and their slush fund. Come November and her defeat the cash cow is gonna go dry and there is going to be a lot of buyers remorse from all those who cozy'd up to the her and Bill.

There should be a lot more coming to them than buyers remorse.

Box
05-17-2016, 06:00
what difference at this point does it make.....

Patrin
05-17-2016, 08:38
The MSM is too busy covering Trumps taxes and sexist past to be worried about the Clintons and their slush fund. Come November and her defeat the cash cow is gonna go dry and there is going to be a lot of buyers remorse from all those who cozy'd up to the her and Bill.

Trump's not going to let them forget....the CF is his biggest attack goldmine.

Team Sergeant
05-17-2016, 09:14
what difference at this point does it make.....

Exactly!

And obama is importing muzzies that will throw the gays off of the highest buildings! (But not without a union card!)

Sohei
05-17-2016, 10:20
Career politicians don't care about the source of their money, they simply want the funds. They could careless about where it comes from...they will pay their favors back later.

PSM
05-17-2016, 10:35
We need to go back to just an Army and a Navy. And, since there was no standing force at the time that the Constitution was ratified, define the role of Commander in Chief to mean "in times of war" only.

Pat

abc_123
05-19-2016, 11:58
Trump's not going to let them forget....the CF is his biggest attack goldmine.

But wait, that wouldn't be nice. A real, Presidential, candidate wouldn't go after the Clinton's on that. He would ignore that and take the high road and lose Presidentially. You know...Like Romney. Or, McCain.

DJ Urbanovsky
05-19-2016, 12:21
You guys realize how many people have died in connection with the Clintons due to aircraft accident or suicide alone?

DJ Urbanovsky
05-19-2016, 12:41
Not to mention that if any of us had mishandled sensitive documents as she did, we would be in prison right now...

Box
05-19-2016, 12:52
You guys realize how many people have died in connection with the Clintons due to aircraft accident or suicide alone?


...what are you suggesting comrade ??

Team Sergeant
05-19-2016, 14:11
You guys realize how many people have died in connection with the Clintons due to aircraft accident or suicide alone?

Now all one has to do is figure out which "communist nation state" is carrying our their orders. :munchin

DJ Urbanovsky
05-20-2016, 12:30
http://i.imgur.com/AykWHUF.gif

...what are you suggesting comrade ??

DJ Urbanovsky
05-20-2016, 12:33
I think the important question is why are those assholes still free to walk the streets...

Now all one has to do is figure out which "communist nation state" is carrying our their orders. :munchin

Mills
05-22-2016, 00:03
I think the important question is why are those assholes still free to walk the streets...

Why are they?

Im not advocating revolution or anything like that..............but hey..................something isn't right about a family that is untouchable like aliens in a John Carpenter movie.

DJ Urbanovsky
05-22-2016, 14:10
The death toll, according to my preliminary calculations.

Aircraft accidents: 38 dead, plus another 184 more dead in collateral damage, in 13 separate incidents. Many of those aircraft were military. One of those guys was an anomaly, an aircraft mechanic who happened to walk into a spinning prop, but it's aircraft related, so I have included it in this number.

Suicide: 21 dead. Many of multiple gunshot wounds. To the head.

Murder: 26 dead.

When you sit down and think about it, as one person, each of us knows a LOT of other people. Personally, I do not know of anyone connected to me that has died in an aircraft accident, suicide, or because they were murdered. All of those people were connected to the Clintons in some way. They were body guards, or business associates, or advisors, or people who were about to testify against the Clintons in some way. They are all dead. And this list does not include incidents of accidental death, such as motor vehicle accidents, house fires, or falling out of windows.

When one considers this pool of data, and compares it against the probability of such events happening due to mere chance alone, I think that it raises some questions.

Joker
05-22-2016, 15:36
... Personally, I do not know of anyone connected to me that has died in an aircraft accident, suicide, or because they were murdered.

You are lucky, I have had several friends and team mates that have perished.

Sohei
05-22-2016, 17:08
You are lucky, I have had several friends and team mates that have perished.

X10. He can certainly consider himself to be a lucky individual. I myself have had too many.

Flagg
05-22-2016, 18:14
The death toll, according to my preliminary calculations.

Aircraft accidents: 38 dead, plus another 184 more dead in collateral damage, in 13 separate incidents. Many of those aircraft were military. One of those guys was an anomaly, an aircraft mechanic who happened to walk into a spinning prop, but it's aircraft related, so I have included it in this number.

Suicide: 21 dead. Many of multiple gunshot wounds. To the head.

Murder: 26 dead.

When you sit down and think about it, as one person, each of us knows a LOT of other people. Personally, I do not know of anyone connected to me that has died in an aircraft accident, suicide, or because they were murdered. All of those people were connected to the Clintons in some way. They were body guards, or business associates, or advisors, or people who were about to testify against the Clintons in some way. They are all dead. And this list does not include incidents of accidental death, such as motor vehicle accidents, house fires, or falling out of windows.

When one considers this pool of data, and compares it against the probability of such events happening due to mere chance alone, I think that it raises some questions.

What would be interesting would be to run a name blind and politically unbiased actuarial analysis.

Say have an unbiased demographer map out those social relationships and then have an unbiased actuary to crunch the numbers.

Maybe it would fall into an extreme outlier category worthy of further investigation or maybe the extremely large number(WAY above the mean,median,mode of average social connections) of social connections held by the Clinton family would explain much or all of the incidents.

I'm no actuary or statistician, but I look forward to the day when a few smart ones use open source big data to effectively bring light to any political corruption darkness.

Maybe that means the lie expectancy of those in the Clinton orbit or maybe the net worth statistics of Members of Congress before/after elected office.

The key I think would be for it to be clearly apolitical, professional, and credible.

PSM
05-22-2016, 18:32
When you sit down and think about it, as one person, each of us knows a LOT of other people. Personally, I do not know of anyone connected to me that has died in an aircraft accident, suicide, or because they were murdered.

Being a pilot and having worked in aviation for decades, I know two who died in crashes, one was part owner of a flight school I worked at and the other was a longtime friend that I got into flying. Unfortunately, he was a commuter pilot and took several people with him and left two children, who survived the crash, orphaned. :mad: I also know two people who were murdered; one was a friend dating back to the Army and the other I just worked with. No traffic deaths but one farm related death. I didn't count Army related deaths because that's different.

ETA: No suicides or disappearances, either.

Pat

DJ Urbanovsky
05-23-2016, 14:23
I cannot disagree with you on that, my friend. I have not had an uninteresting life either, so I would say extremely lucky.


You are lucky, I have had several friends and team mates that have perished.

DJ Urbanovsky
05-23-2016, 14:27
One need not be an actuary or statistician to parse data and evaluate what it says. One need merely be objective, and in this case, also possess a willingness to ask uncomfortable questions.


What would be interesting would be to run a name blind and politically unbiased actuarial analysis.

Say have an unbiased demographer map out those social relationships and then have an unbiased actuary to crunch the numbers.

Maybe it would fall into an extreme outlier category worthy of further investigation or maybe the extremely large number(WAY above the mean,median,mode of average social connections) of social connections held by the Clinton family would explain much or all of the incidents.

I'm no actuary or statistician, but I look forward to the day when a few smart ones use open source big data to effectively bring light to any political corruption darkness.

Maybe that means the lie expectancy of those in the Clinton orbit or maybe the net worth statistics of Members of Congress before/after elected office.

The key I think would be for it to be clearly apolitical, professional, and credible.

DJ Urbanovsky
05-23-2016, 14:41
That you've personally been in the aviation industry and are a pilot, and have been doing that for decades, and yet only personally knew two people who died in crashes, I think, speaks volumes.

I know some pilots. You guys are a meticulous lot, and considering what you do, you have to be. When you take into account that driving a car is statistically much more dangerous than air travel (which is pretty remarkable to me when, as a layperson, I can look at a live radar map of the USA and see just how many aircraft are up in the air at any given time - a BUNCH of them!), and that all of those aircraft are up there in the sky, all day, every day, with very few accidents, does it not strike you as odd that so many people surrounding the Clintons have died in so many aircraft related incidents? Again, you've been flying for decades, and yet you only knew two?




Being a pilot and having worked in aviation for decades, I know two who died in crashes, one was part owner of a flight school I worked at and the other was a longtime friend that I got into flying. Unfortunately, he was a commuter pilot and took several people with him and left two children orphaned. :mad: I also know two people who were murdered; one was a friend dating back to the Army and the other I just worked with. No traffic deaths but one farm related death. I didn't count Army related deaths because that's different.

ETA: No suicides or disappearances, either.

Pat

DJ Urbanovsky
05-24-2016, 13:28
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-it-staffer-refuses-to-testify-after-immunity-deal/article/2589310

Gee, I wonder why he would do such a thing?

PedOncoDoc
05-24-2016, 13:36
Gee, I wonder why he would do such a thing?

Obviously, he didn't want to risk an "accident".... :rolleyes:

ddoering
05-24-2016, 14:34
It shows how impotent and irrelevant that congress is anymore. Nobody fears nor respects them enough to comply. And they wonder why the president acts like a 2 bit dictator.:rolleyes:

SF-TX
05-24-2016, 15:08
Gee, I wonder why he would do such a thing?

Plata o plomo.

DJ Urbanovsky
05-27-2016, 12:10
People haven't started calling her Killary for nothing...

Plata o plomo.