Who Won, Drudge Poll..

[JJ_BPK]

I'm not so hung up on the winners, the best will float to the top.

BUT the losers,, not floating so good,, should seriously think about a new career venue..


**DRUDGE POLL** WHO WON THE 2ND REPUBLICAN DEBATE '16?
BUSH 1% 5,278 votes

CARSON 4% 17,968 votes

CHRISTIE 1% 5,324 votes

CRUZ 5% 24,325 votes

FIORINA 17% 75,243 votes

HUCKABEE 1% 2,422 votes

KASICH 1% 5,063 votes

PAUL 4% 20,111 votes

RUBIO 5% 23,830 votes

TRUMP 60% 273,156 votes

WALKER 1% 3,207 votes

455,927 Total Votes Posted 12 hours. << AT 6:30 AM



https://polldaddy.com/poll/9081166/?view=results

[Five-O]

Not sure how anyone watching the debate could think Trump won. He was clearly out of his depth in the FP arena and admitted as much when pressed on it. His compliment to Fiorina, "You're a beautiful woman" was flat out creepy. It was his weakest showing to date.

[DDD]

Full disclosure, I did not watch the debate (or the subsequent analysis).

The people who like Trump, like him the same way that people like President Obama.
They can't justify it (for the most part), but you hear the same terms.

Not saying right or wrong, just my opinion. Although it is amusing that the libs are OK with people adoring Pres Obama but not Trump:rolleyes:

[JJ_BPK]

The numbers are shifting a bit..

But the 1%'ters should look elsewhere for a career..



BUSH
1%
6,698 votes


CARSON
4%
23,091 votes


CHRISTIE
1%
7,200 votes


CRUZ
6%
31,931 votes


FIORINA
20%
108,592 votes


HUCKABEE
1%
3,281 votes


KASICH
1%
6,587 votes


PAUL
4%
23,586 votes


RUBIO
6%
33,157 votes


TRUMP
55%
303,927 votes


WALKER
1%
4,141 votes



552,191 Total Votes <<< 9:40AM

[craigepo]

Fiorina, Rubio, and Christie were spot-on all night. A candidate can look presidential with a well-prepared answer even if you disagree with him/her. Conversely, a poorly-delivered but right answer doesn't do a candidate any good. Those three were ready.

I have no idea who will eventually win the primary, but those three should be in the winner's cabinet.

Fiorina definitely has some Margaret Thatcher-type fire in her.

[Hand]

If I had to narrow the playing field based solely on last nights debate:

Marco Rubio
Carlie Fiorina
Mike Huckabee
Dr. Carson
Donald Trump


Fiorina really did her homework on foreign policy, and that impressed me. She came prepared. She did lose a couple points with me for mentioning Clinton; I really wanted to hear what each candidate could verbalize without trying to look better by finger pointing at Obama and Hillary.

Trump, he managed to field a majority of the scrutiny without really saying anything at all. However, he said at one point regarding FP something to the effect of "before I'm seated I will have assembled the very best team and be up to speed". I believe that he will, furthermore is that not status quo?

Rubio really impressed me as well. His dead serious tone, clear thoughts, and obvious intimate knowledge with the issues addressed moved him into my top 5.

Dr. Carson really tried hard to play the game (and play it well IMHO) up there. You could tell he was doing some learning on the fly, and managed to hang with career camera cheesing politicians.

Mike Huckabee demonstrated respectful, calm responses. He never used smear tactics, he spoke directly of the issues and did so with maturity and logic. I appreciate his values and see him as a valuable member of a future administration. Maybe not POTUS...

Caisik stood out to me as being mature and well versed, well spoken and definitely a worthy candidate. I'll keep him on my reserve bench.

The rest of them IMHO are more of the same. Career politicians who know how to say pretty things and smile just right into the camera.

I offer my take, here, for the sake of discussion only.