PDA

View Full Version : California Students Now Have Six Different Genders


Team Sergeant
07-29-2015, 18:42
Guess I cannot attend the University of California education system, my gender choice is not listed, "Not Confused Primal Male" :munchin



University of California Students Now Have Six Different Genders They Can Choose From

Jul. 27, 2015 10:42am Kaitlyn Schallhorn

Students filling out applications for the University of California system can now choose between six different genders to identify themselves.

Asked the question, “How do you describe yourself?” prospective students can choose from the following: “male, female, trans male/trans man, trans female/trans woman, gender queer/gender non-conforming and different identity.”

cont:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/27/university-of-california-students-now-have-six-different-genders-they-can-choose-from/

Hand
07-30-2015, 09:05
If the liberal agenda is to gradually turn the globe into a single neighborhood, where everyone wears the same color and drives the same car and are given the same rations by their owners, where is this sudden explosion of choice of identity coming from?

Box
07-30-2015, 09:57
when you spread "individuality" so thin that everyone is different, JUST like everyone else, when you have is a society that is one layer thick...
...just a single layer. No depth - just what you see on the surface.

Liberal diversity is sleight of hand - nothing more, nothing less.

It isn't about diversity. It is about letting everyone choose their own coat of paint as long as the motor under the hood is the same.
...liberal diversity is all about letting you look however you like as long as you think the way you are told to think.

Trapper John
07-30-2015, 11:20
when you spread "individuality" so thin that everyone is different, JUST like everyone else, when you have is a society that is one layer thick...
...just a single layer. No depth - just what you see on the surface.

Liberal diversity is sleight of hand - nothing more, nothing less.

It isn't about diversity. It is about letting everyone choose their own coat of paint as long as the motor under the hood is the same.
...liberal diversity is all about letting you look however you like as long as you think the way you are told to think.

Clearly you are not collective-thinking and that certainly is not good-speak. Get Thee to the nearest re-education camp post-haste. :p

Box
07-30-2015, 14:07
Clearly you are not collective-thinking and that certainly is not good-speak. Get Thee to the nearest re-education camp post-haste. :p

Make no mistake...
...what I wrote was purely sarcastic.


I am firmly in the Clinton Camp and cannot wait until her glorious coronation.
It is my hope that I can someday revel in the greatness of a nation rebuilt in her shadow.
Hillary is doubleplusgood!

Hand
07-30-2015, 14:13
Hillary is doubleplusgood!

:D

Sdiver
07-30-2015, 14:33
Hillary is doubleplusgood!

Ooooo ... I like that. Simple and to the point.

I would think it would be a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take "good", for instance. If you have a word like "good", what need is there for a word like "bad"? "Ungood" will do just as well — better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid" and all the rest of them? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or "doubleplusgood" if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words — in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that ...

Someone should look at making a new dictionary. :munchin

craigepo
07-30-2015, 16:02
Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?

The Reaper
07-30-2015, 16:05
Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?

It occurred to me about six years ago.

TR

Paslode
07-30-2015, 16:17
Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?


Recently the world took a very noticeable leap towards radicalism, almost as though the radicals see the end game in sight.....but I am with TR, the freak show started 6 years ago when the zombie's blindly voted Zero into office.

Badger52
07-30-2015, 17:16
Someone should look at making a new dictionary. :munchinProbably no need. Tell your friends! Just keep using it often enough and it will wind up in the OED.

ddoering
07-30-2015, 17:38
Which one do they check for "Go fuck yourself?"

PSM
07-30-2015, 17:43
Which one do they check for "Go fuck yourself?"

None of the above? :confused:

Pat

Box
07-30-2015, 18:55
almost as though the radicals see the end game in sight...

There is no "end game" for liberals.
...you can always be controlled a "little more"

Divemaster
07-30-2015, 19:18
According to the progressives, there is nothing wrong with individuality as long as we all do it together.

NurseTim
07-30-2015, 21:50
Which one do they check for "Go fuck yourself?"

Polysexual w/o regards to species. :D

Hand
07-31-2015, 08:11
There is no "end game" for liberals.
...you can always be controlled a "little more"

According to the progressives, there is nothing wrong with individuality as long as we all do it together.

doubleplussmart statements both.

Guy
07-31-2015, 09:09
Polysexual:confused: w/o regards to species. :DI quit!

tonyz
07-31-2015, 09:58
What about the pan-sexual hermaphrodite...pre-op...

Excluding those folks on a form must be a form of micro-aggression...at least in academia...

Trapper John
07-31-2015, 12:31
Make no mistake...
...what I wrote was purely sarcastic.


I am firmly in the Clinton Camp and cannot wait until her glorious coronation.
It is my hope that I can someday revel in the greatness of a nation rebuilt in her shadow.
Hillary is doubleplusgood!

OK, your good to go Comrade. Dear Leader is pleased.

You did genuflect didn't you when you spoke of her name? :p

Team Sergeant
07-31-2015, 13:16
I quit!

You can't friggin quit, do you have any idea how difficult you'd be to replace?

Box
07-31-2015, 13:51
I quit!


..."you cant go; all the plants are gonna die"

Roguish Lawyer
07-31-2015, 15:26
..."you cant go; all the plants are gonna die"

I'm the little acorn that becomes the oak!

Joker
07-31-2015, 16:08
I'm the little acorn that becomes the oak!

No, you're just a nut...:D

Guy
07-31-2015, 16:22
You can't friggin quit, do you have any idea how difficult you'd be to replace?I'm not figuring out these new "human" species...:lifter

Roguish Lawyer
07-31-2015, 17:16
No, you're just a nut...:D

No need for the pink, brother. I am a card-carrying, full-on, right-wing nut job. High up in the General Counsel's office of the Great Right-Wing Conspiracy. I embrace it. :)

MR2
07-31-2015, 19:24
No, you're just a nut...:D

BOOM! ROTFLMAO

The Reaper
07-31-2015, 20:14
No need for the pink, brother. I am a card-carrying, full-on, right-wing nut job. High up in the General Counsel's office of the Great Right-Wing Conspiracy. I embrace it. :)

Thank you.

If I didn't think you were one of a kind, you might almost restore my belief in the legal system.

TR

Roguish Lawyer
08-01-2015, 12:34
Thank you.

If I didn't think you were one of a kind, you might almost restore my belief in the legal system.

TR

:o:)

ddoering
08-01-2015, 18:10
Now that I've had a chance to think on it, six choices seems so limiting. I'm feeling a micro-aggression here.....

Trapper John
08-03-2015, 12:02
Now that I've had a chance to think on it, six choices seems so limiting. I'm feeling a micro-aggression here.....

:D This newspeak "micro-aggression" BS is driving me bat-shit crazy! WTF is a "micro-aggression anyway - an attack by a midget? Oh, excuse me ... a "little person".

ddoering
08-03-2015, 16:13
For your entertainment:


Microaggression theory


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (September 2014)



This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. (September 2014)




Microaggression is a recently coined term which some use to refer to unintended discrimination. Psychiatrist and Harvard University professor Chester M. Pierce coined the word microaggression in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals he said he had regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflict on African Americans.[1][2][3][4] In 1973, MIT economist Mary Rowe extended the term to include similar aggressions directed at women; eventually, the term came to encompass the casual degradation of any socially marginalized group, such as poor people, disabled people and sexual minorities.[citation needed



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microaggression_theory

SF_BHT
08-03-2015, 16:20
For your entertainment:


Microaggression theory


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (September 2014)



This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. (September 2014)




Microaggression is a recently coined term which some use to refer to unintended discrimination. Psychiatrist and Harvard University professor Chester M. Pierce coined the word microaggression in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals he said he had regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflict on African Americans.[1][2][3][4] In 1973, MIT economist Mary Rowe extended the term to include similar aggressions directed at women; eventually, the term came to encompass the casual degradation of any socially marginalized group, such as poor people, disabled people and sexual minorities.[citation needed



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microaggression_theory

WTF. Just another overthinking POS that has nothing else to do than dream up more PC terms.
I hope I did not microoffend any one because I really meant to Offend them.:eek:

PSM
08-03-2015, 16:29
:D

The Reaper
08-03-2015, 16:43
Well, you can't expect to hurt anyone's feelings with anything micro, we need some macro-aggression, you sorry, m@#$%^&*()g %$$#@)!

Guy, preach on it!

TR

Trapper John
08-03-2015, 17:17
WTF. Just another overthinking POS that has nothing else to do than dream up more PC terms.
I hope I did not microoffend any one because I really meant to Offend them.:eek:

You took the words out of my mouth! Holy over-think, Batman!

If I experience micro-aggression should I therefore be micro-pissed?

I was about to say, this crap is a massive distraction from what is really important. But, then I realized that is the point now isn't it?

Damn, this silly shit makes my head hurt!