Stobey
04-16-2015, 16:33
I have never written all of this before; but many people have had a lot of questions about why things are the way they are - especially in the United States, and throughout much of the once "free world". I wrote this a while ago; and have since "tweaked" it to reflect contemporary events.
It is long, so please bear with me. I would greatly value other opinions. As TR might say: "YMMV", some may agree, and some may think that I am way out in left field. That's fine. But I would still like to hear what you think - whatever you may think.
__________________________________________________ _____________
(Originally written as a response to an article by Doug Hagmann, from Canada Free Press)
Yes, all of the pieces of this evil plan seem to be coming together, and from various directions, and all to bring about an enslaved world. The U.S. Republic is lost, possibly forever. I believe that the situation we find ourselves in is way too far gone to be corrected at the ballot box. The trap is about ready to close - on many fronts.
And then there's Syria, Iraq redux, the illegal alien invasion, Ferguson, Mo and Bed-Stuy, NY, the continuing saga of "As the Stomach Turns" with ISIS, and now constant re-settlement of so-called "refugees" from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, et.al. in our home towns. And guess what? 90% of these "refugees" are muzlim. What is more is not only are we not allowed to flatly refuse, we haven't even been asked! The UN (Useless Nincompoops) and our traitorous State Dept. (loaded to the gills with CFR members (Council on Foreign Relations) are paying YOUR tax-payer dollars to approx. 9 so-called "religious" organizations to bring them in. (Check out resettlementwatch.com).
This calls into question not just the tolerance of enemies among us - but the very insistence to bring those enemies among us. Why?
There is something more sinister going on here than meets the eye, not just for the U.S., but for ALL of what we would still like to think of as the "free world". In addition to the pressure of the imminent collapse of the economies of the various sovereign nations of the world, NO leaders could possibly be as obtuse as those in Great Britain, the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, and throughout the E.U., than to constantly proclaim (more stridently than ever, it seems) after each successive atrocity perpetrated by muzlim jihadis that: "This has nothing to do with Islam!" despite constant and repeated proof to the contrary, even from the mouths of the jihadis themselves. No, this is willful blindness; and it seems to me that it has a purpose – one that does not bode well for the overwhelming majority of us.
The intended "balkanization" of the United States in particular, but also of all of what we once used to call "the free world", certainly has a purpose: the destruction of those countries as sovereign nations. The EU has pretty much already seen to that in Europe. In this hemisphere it was the SPP (the so-called "Security and Prosperity Partnership") conceived within the bowels of the CFR. It has not been stopped, only driven "underground". Surely Obama's zeal to import this (and other) hemispheres' third world masses into the once-sovereign United States makes that very clear.
I do believe the muzzies (and others) are being used by a handful of very powerful individuals, just as the Bolsheviks were used back in 1917; and just as the Nazis were used back in the late 1930s - just to name 2 examples. This handful of super ambitious men have used people - even masses of people - as catalysts to achieve certain "states of conflict", if you will. That makes it easier to manipulate other masses of people in conflict against them.
I keep thinking of that damned "Hegelian Dialectic" in these situations: Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Remember, like Marx and Engels, these would-be "Rulers of the World" have an "absolute ideal" that they wish to bring about. Whether some want to call it "Socialism", others "Communism", others "Islamism", and still others a “New World Order”. (And before you tell me to take out stock in tinfoil, just bear with me a while longer.)
Hegel states that "Because every 'synthesis' is the 'thesis' of a new dialectic, social change is guaranteed. He also maintains that this process will continue, allowing history to unfold and to "progress" until the "ABSOLUTE IDEAL" - the ultimate "synthesis" - so "perfect" that it gives rise to no "antithesis", is achieved.
"Absolute ideal"??? In whose mind? “The ultimate synthesis"??? By whose standards?
Very good questions.
If we might let our minds entertain the idea that a few super-ambitious, very intelligent, extremely rich, and very powerful men very much want this "New World Order" to be ruled over by them - the handful of “elite” - with a larger gang of "tools" who have made themselves useful to this elite to help control the peons (that's us, by the way - the peons), then this whole idea doesn't seem too far-fetched.
History has shown that there have always been those who have wanted to "rule" the world. Superior ability breeds superior ambition. However, they have never been able to pull off the "planetary bargain" by the usual means - that is, by aggression and war. Many have tried, and they have all failed.
Since then, some few have figured it out - that the usual means [war – by itself] will never work. That the only way to pull off this "planetary bargain" is to control the world's monetary systems – preferably to merge these systems into one “world-wide” system. (Think IMF, the World Bank and the BIS - Bank for International Settlements - as interim phases.)
And just to shine a light on the type of individual Georg Hegel was, let me give you a quote: "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges." -- This was Author/historian William Shirer, (quoting Georg Hegel) in Shirer’s book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144).
That certainly doesn't sound like the thoughts of the "everyday" sort of people - you and me, for instance - that make up the bulk of the world's population, does it? In fact, that line of thought is anathema to those of us who value freedom. That sort of thought seems to come from a megalo-maniacal, uber-narcissistic personality. (Islam’s so-called “prophet”, Mohammed, instantly comes to mind.) Karl Marx and Frederick Engels were of the same mind as Hegel; and in fact relied upon Hegel's theory to back up their economic theory of communism.
Remember, communism was never about "share the wealth". That was the con-job served up to the masses to make socialism/communism sound appealing to them. It was always about control the wealth; and, by extension, the people. And that is why socialism/communism always seemed to attract the strangest bedfellows, like the Rockefellers and George Soros types for instance.
Remember also some of these SOBs have made it quite clear in some of their arrogant "slips" that have been quoted - such as:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” — David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
or this gem:
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
— David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
or this one:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” — David Rockefeller
These are just from one super-wealthy, megalomaniac. There are more. I'll add just one:
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
— Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Bottom line, this is all about power - something that some people desire above all things. What I call "normal" minds (that's us peons) cannot really understand this lust for power. I certainly can't. Most of us have all we can do to live our own lives without wanting to control others’ lives.
It is long, so please bear with me. I would greatly value other opinions. As TR might say: "YMMV", some may agree, and some may think that I am way out in left field. That's fine. But I would still like to hear what you think - whatever you may think.
__________________________________________________ _____________
(Originally written as a response to an article by Doug Hagmann, from Canada Free Press)
Yes, all of the pieces of this evil plan seem to be coming together, and from various directions, and all to bring about an enslaved world. The U.S. Republic is lost, possibly forever. I believe that the situation we find ourselves in is way too far gone to be corrected at the ballot box. The trap is about ready to close - on many fronts.
And then there's Syria, Iraq redux, the illegal alien invasion, Ferguson, Mo and Bed-Stuy, NY, the continuing saga of "As the Stomach Turns" with ISIS, and now constant re-settlement of so-called "refugees" from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, et.al. in our home towns. And guess what? 90% of these "refugees" are muzlim. What is more is not only are we not allowed to flatly refuse, we haven't even been asked! The UN (Useless Nincompoops) and our traitorous State Dept. (loaded to the gills with CFR members (Council on Foreign Relations) are paying YOUR tax-payer dollars to approx. 9 so-called "religious" organizations to bring them in. (Check out resettlementwatch.com).
This calls into question not just the tolerance of enemies among us - but the very insistence to bring those enemies among us. Why?
There is something more sinister going on here than meets the eye, not just for the U.S., but for ALL of what we would still like to think of as the "free world". In addition to the pressure of the imminent collapse of the economies of the various sovereign nations of the world, NO leaders could possibly be as obtuse as those in Great Britain, the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, and throughout the E.U., than to constantly proclaim (more stridently than ever, it seems) after each successive atrocity perpetrated by muzlim jihadis that: "This has nothing to do with Islam!" despite constant and repeated proof to the contrary, even from the mouths of the jihadis themselves. No, this is willful blindness; and it seems to me that it has a purpose – one that does not bode well for the overwhelming majority of us.
The intended "balkanization" of the United States in particular, but also of all of what we once used to call "the free world", certainly has a purpose: the destruction of those countries as sovereign nations. The EU has pretty much already seen to that in Europe. In this hemisphere it was the SPP (the so-called "Security and Prosperity Partnership") conceived within the bowels of the CFR. It has not been stopped, only driven "underground". Surely Obama's zeal to import this (and other) hemispheres' third world masses into the once-sovereign United States makes that very clear.
I do believe the muzzies (and others) are being used by a handful of very powerful individuals, just as the Bolsheviks were used back in 1917; and just as the Nazis were used back in the late 1930s - just to name 2 examples. This handful of super ambitious men have used people - even masses of people - as catalysts to achieve certain "states of conflict", if you will. That makes it easier to manipulate other masses of people in conflict against them.
I keep thinking of that damned "Hegelian Dialectic" in these situations: Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Remember, like Marx and Engels, these would-be "Rulers of the World" have an "absolute ideal" that they wish to bring about. Whether some want to call it "Socialism", others "Communism", others "Islamism", and still others a “New World Order”. (And before you tell me to take out stock in tinfoil, just bear with me a while longer.)
Hegel states that "Because every 'synthesis' is the 'thesis' of a new dialectic, social change is guaranteed. He also maintains that this process will continue, allowing history to unfold and to "progress" until the "ABSOLUTE IDEAL" - the ultimate "synthesis" - so "perfect" that it gives rise to no "antithesis", is achieved.
"Absolute ideal"??? In whose mind? “The ultimate synthesis"??? By whose standards?
Very good questions.
If we might let our minds entertain the idea that a few super-ambitious, very intelligent, extremely rich, and very powerful men very much want this "New World Order" to be ruled over by them - the handful of “elite” - with a larger gang of "tools" who have made themselves useful to this elite to help control the peons (that's us, by the way - the peons), then this whole idea doesn't seem too far-fetched.
History has shown that there have always been those who have wanted to "rule" the world. Superior ability breeds superior ambition. However, they have never been able to pull off the "planetary bargain" by the usual means - that is, by aggression and war. Many have tried, and they have all failed.
Since then, some few have figured it out - that the usual means [war – by itself] will never work. That the only way to pull off this "planetary bargain" is to control the world's monetary systems – preferably to merge these systems into one “world-wide” system. (Think IMF, the World Bank and the BIS - Bank for International Settlements - as interim phases.)
And just to shine a light on the type of individual Georg Hegel was, let me give you a quote: "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges." -- This was Author/historian William Shirer, (quoting Georg Hegel) in Shirer’s book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144).
That certainly doesn't sound like the thoughts of the "everyday" sort of people - you and me, for instance - that make up the bulk of the world's population, does it? In fact, that line of thought is anathema to those of us who value freedom. That sort of thought seems to come from a megalo-maniacal, uber-narcissistic personality. (Islam’s so-called “prophet”, Mohammed, instantly comes to mind.) Karl Marx and Frederick Engels were of the same mind as Hegel; and in fact relied upon Hegel's theory to back up their economic theory of communism.
Remember, communism was never about "share the wealth". That was the con-job served up to the masses to make socialism/communism sound appealing to them. It was always about control the wealth; and, by extension, the people. And that is why socialism/communism always seemed to attract the strangest bedfellows, like the Rockefellers and George Soros types for instance.
Remember also some of these SOBs have made it quite clear in some of their arrogant "slips" that have been quoted - such as:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” — David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
or this gem:
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
— David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
or this one:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” — David Rockefeller
These are just from one super-wealthy, megalomaniac. There are more. I'll add just one:
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
— Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Bottom line, this is all about power - something that some people desire above all things. What I call "normal" minds (that's us peons) cannot really understand this lust for power. I certainly can't. Most of us have all we can do to live our own lives without wanting to control others’ lives.