Log in

View Full Version : The Middle East Explained In One Chart


Richard
08-27-2013, 10:00
Can't tell the players without a program. So...who's in first?

Richard

The Middle East, Explained In One (sort of terrifying) Chart
WaPo, 26 Aug 2013

What could be simpler than the Middle East? A well-known Egyptian blogger who writes under the pseudonym The Big Pharaoh put together this chart laying out the region’s rivalries and alliances. He’s kindly granted me permission to post it, so that Americans might better understand the region. The joke is that it’s not a joke; this is actually pretty accurate.

Badger52
08-27-2013, 12:14
USA ---------> MB (Muslim Brotherhood)

Looking from their perspective, makes perfect sense to me.

PRB
08-27-2013, 12:29
The lines are too straight...should be curvy, swoopy and round about.

Stargazer
08-27-2013, 12:34
I was thinking USA - Israel connection should be dotted (at least from a 'public' perspective).

Is Russia really only directly linked to Assad and hate for Syria rebels? hmmm...

ghp95134
08-27-2013, 13:04
No red lines TOWARDS the USA?

[USA]<--------------[Iran; MB; etc.]

I guess it would get too crowded and you'd need a larger chart.

--ghp

sinjefe
08-27-2013, 13:24
I think it was meant to be taken tongue in cheek.

Oldrotorhead
08-27-2013, 13:27
Where is the box for the 12 Christians left in most of the Muslim countries? Thanks for making this so clear. I have a head ache now and going to take a nap.

Airbornelawyer
08-27-2013, 14:42
Based on my observations of Administration policies, I think perhaps most of the lines leading from the US should be recolored to "has no clue".

mojaveman
08-27-2013, 14:47
The chart is missing a few red arrows pointed at Israel. At least that's kind of what I picked up on after working in the Middle East recently.

alelks
08-28-2013, 07:24
26248

Threads merged

Sdiver
08-28-2013, 08:46
Makes perfect sense to me.

Snaquebite
08-28-2013, 09:05
The enemy of my enemy is my enemy...Ooops that's not how it goes...'ceptin for The Great O.

PRB
08-28-2013, 09:39
I think it was meant to be taken tongue in cheek.

It was