BKKMAN
04-09-2013, 21:49
Bread and Circuses...no wonder California is billions in debt and major cities are going bankrupt...that's some really stellar legislation from the Left side of the aisle...
Legislation has been filed that would require group insurance to cover gay and lesbian infertility treatments just as they do heterosexual. But, as I note elsewhere, AB 460 isn’t limited to a finding of actual infertility. Nor does it require that gays and lesbians have tried to conceive or sire a child using heterosexual means, natural or artificial. Rather–as with heterosexual couples–merely the inability to get pregnant for a year while having active sexual relations is sufficient to demonstrate need for treatment, meaning if the bill becomes law, it would require insurance companies to pay for services such as artificial insemination, surrogacy, etc. for people who are actually fecund. Indeed, since the bill prevents discrimination based on marital or domestic partnership status, theoretically every gay and lesbian in the state could be deemed infertile for purposes of insurance coverage merely by the fact that they don’t wish to engage in heterosexual relations.
So, two gay males in a domestic partnership can bang away on each other's back door for a year and then claim that they are infertile...unless you consider producing sperm-covered "milk duds" procreating...
And two lesbians could do the same for a year and then even if both of the lesbians are in fact, fertile and able to conceive, they could claim "infertility" because they licked and dildoed each other for a year and didn't produce a baby...huh...
:eek::confused::eek::rolleyes:
Infertility Article (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/344861/ca-legislation-would-require-insurance-gay-infertility-wesley-j-smith)
CA Bill AB 460 (http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB460)
ETA: For those too busy to look up "fecund", it means "fertile"
Legislation has been filed that would require group insurance to cover gay and lesbian infertility treatments just as they do heterosexual. But, as I note elsewhere, AB 460 isn’t limited to a finding of actual infertility. Nor does it require that gays and lesbians have tried to conceive or sire a child using heterosexual means, natural or artificial. Rather–as with heterosexual couples–merely the inability to get pregnant for a year while having active sexual relations is sufficient to demonstrate need for treatment, meaning if the bill becomes law, it would require insurance companies to pay for services such as artificial insemination, surrogacy, etc. for people who are actually fecund. Indeed, since the bill prevents discrimination based on marital or domestic partnership status, theoretically every gay and lesbian in the state could be deemed infertile for purposes of insurance coverage merely by the fact that they don’t wish to engage in heterosexual relations.
So, two gay males in a domestic partnership can bang away on each other's back door for a year and then claim that they are infertile...unless you consider producing sperm-covered "milk duds" procreating...
And two lesbians could do the same for a year and then even if both of the lesbians are in fact, fertile and able to conceive, they could claim "infertility" because they licked and dildoed each other for a year and didn't produce a baby...huh...
:eek::confused::eek::rolleyes:
Infertility Article (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/344861/ca-legislation-would-require-insurance-gay-infertility-wesley-j-smith)
CA Bill AB 460 (http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB460)
ETA: For those too busy to look up "fecund", it means "fertile"