View Full Version : Liberal Logic 101
This pretty much says it all........
This pretty much says it all........
This pretty much says it all........the end
those are spot on....who can deny there logic
(closest to pink I could get...)
I think one grievous error has been made.
It's Kerry's wife who's rich.
I believe this may help clarify the doublespeak in QP MR2's pictures. :)
10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Dont Understand (http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/07/31/10_concepts_liberals_talk_about_incessantly_but_do nt_understand/page/full/)
1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?
2) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don't belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can't be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
3) Fairness: In all fairness, I must admit that fairness is an arbitrary concept. So, you could make the argument that no one could get "fairness" wrong. Still, liberals do because they don't make any effort to actually "be fair." As a practical matter, liberals define "fairness" as taking as much as possible from people who they don't think are going to vote for them and giving it to people who may vote for them in return for their ill gotten largesse. Certainly conservatives, libertarians, and moderates might disagree about how much money to take from the wealthy to redistribute to the poor or how to help the disadvantaged, but the only liberal answer to the question, "How much is enough?" is "more."
4) Greed: To a liberal, believing that you pay too much in taxes or even opposing paying more in taxes is greedy. In actuality, wanting to loot as much money as possible that someone else has earned to use for your own purposes, which is what liberals do, is a much better example of greed.
5) Hate: Liberals often define simple disagreement with them on issues like gay marriage, tax rates, or abortion as hatred. No matter how well a position is explained, or the logical underpinnings behind it, it's chalked up to hate. Meanwhile, the angriest, most vicious, most hateful people in all of politics are liberals railing against what they say is "hatred." This irony is completely lost on the Left.
6) Investment: Actual investments involve putting money or resources into a project in hopes that they will appreciate in value. Liberals skip the second half of that equation. To them, an "investment" is taking someone else's tax dollars and putting it into a project that liberals approve of and whether a profit is made or lost is so irrelevant that they typically don't even bother to measure the results.
7) Charity: Contributing your own money or time to a good cause is charity. Liberals view themselves as charitable if they take someone else's tax dollars and give it away to people they hope will vote for them in return. At a minimum, they should at least credit the taxpayers who paid for the money they gave away for the charity, although it's not really charity if it's involuntary. Of course, there's nothing charitable about asking someone else to sacrifice for your gain, which could actually be better described as selfish.
8) Patriotism: Liberals love America the way a wife beater loves his spouse. That's why they're always beating up the country "for its own good." Doesn't the country understand that liberals have to hit it in the mouth because they LOVE IT SO MUCH?!?!? Of course, the conventional definition of patriotism, which is loving your country and wishing it well, isn't one that liberals can wrap their heads around.
9) Tolerance: In a free, open, and pluralistic society, there are all sorts of behaviors that we may have to tolerate, even though we don't approve of those activities. Liberals don't get this distinction. For one thing, they don't understand the difference between tolerance and acceptance. They also don't extend any of the tolerance they're agitating for to people who disagree with them. Liberals silence people who disagree with them at every opportunity which is, dare we say it, an extremely intolerant way to behave.
10) Diversity: What liberals mean by "diversity" is that they want a broad range of people from different races, colors, and creeds who have identical political views. A black or Hispanic conservative doesn't contribute to "diversity" in liberal eyes because he actually has diverse views. Incredible role models for women like Sarah Palin can't be feminists to liberals because she doesn't share the same liberal beliefs as sexist pigs like Anthony Weiner and Bill Maher. How can you have any meaningful "diversity" when everyone has to think the same way?
More fun...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32hdl8Pb_m4&feature=youtube_gdata_player
"You are too stupid to run your life.
It is the right of the self-selected elite few to run it.
You must fund the way they run your life."
miclo18d
08-01-2012, 07:13
More fun...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32hdl...e_gdata_player
"You are too stupid to run your life.
It is the right of the self-selected elite few to run it.
You must fund the way they run your life."
How do you know all of this?
Paul Krugman's articles...he is a genius...there are graphs and things like that...it's so complicated that only a few people understand...
LMFAO!!!
DR_BRETT
08-01-2012, 13:47
No offense intended to the title's author, but CONSISTENCY (or consistent logic) is hardly a hallmark of "liberals" (I call them Commies) .
(Yes, I know the title is intended to be sarcastic)
By the way, there IS a "pink" color available -- that is its NAME on this site, and it is supposed to be the Color Of Sarcasm.
Krugman is a Pinko Party Propaganda hack .
Thanks for the Grim Humor Posters -- illustrating (with captions) that Altruist sacrifice and Evasion are evil .
Mencken was good .
ZonieDiver
08-01-2012, 16:16
By the way, there IS a "pink" color available -- that is its NAME on this site, and it is supposed to be the Color Of Sarcasm.
Really?!? Thanks for the tip.
Radar Rider
08-01-2012, 19:44
MR2,
Please allow me to thank you for posting those (perfect) illustrations of liberal hypocrisy. Such things can provoke great emotional responses from any person; my response is that while I'm glad to see the truth so easily demonstrated, I'm angered that the same truth is too often easily dismissed.
Even more distressing, too me, is that so many people can so easily be convinced that none of those things occur.
I am no bright light in the world of thinkers; I DO have, I think, the wherewithal to recognize liberal BS when it so blatantly illustrated.
I particularly liked this one from that site:
22873
Anyone who inspired Barack Obama, such as Frank Marshal Davis or Saul Alinsky, is to be ignored. Anyone who inspired Paul Ryan, like oh say Ayn Rand, is to be investigated and pointed out as a radical right-winger (nevermind she was also extremely pro-choice).
Just had to slip in the abortion thing, huh.:D
Anyone who inspired Paul Ryan, like oh say Ayn Rand, is to be investigated and pointed out as a radical right-winger (nevermind she was also extremely pro-choice).
Like this one that just popped onto the radar screen?
AYN RAND IS CURIOUS CHOICE FOR CONSERVATIVE VENERATION
UExpress, 18 Aug 2012
http://news.yahoo.com/ayn-rand-curious-choice-conservative-veneration-050019648.html
But talking about politics and "logic"... :eek:
Todd Akin's 'legitimate rape' claim: Will it cost Republicans the Senate?
TheWeek, 19 Aug 2012
http://news.yahoo.com/todd-akins-legitimate-rape-claim-cost-republicans-senate-070000363.html
Illogic abounds in this campaign cycle...it ain't just a Ron Paul thing out there in the whacky world of those who view themselves as primus inter pares.
And so it goes...
Richard :munchin
So many excellent choices, but I think this will do for now.
Badger52
08-20-2012, 08:17
Anyone who inspired Barack Obama, such as Frank Marshal Davis or Saul Alinsky, is to be ignored. Anyone who inspired Paul Ryan, like oh say Ayn Rand, is to be investigated and pointed out as a radical right-winger (nevermind she was also extremely pro-choice).The liberal community, exemplified by the author of the article QP Richard cites, will use that in its narrow context when it suits them; nothing will prevent that. It's their version of Blazer beer-can, cheap and usually on the shelf.
They will astutely avoid its larger context of the huge list of stuff that government shouldn't be involved in, one way or the other. The UExpress article contains a Ryan quote that simply needs to be out front:
"The fight we are in here, make no mistake about it, is a fight of individualism versus collectivism."