View Full Version : Feds: Airlines Must Let Passengers Fly With Pigs for 'Emotional Support'
(CNSNews.com) – Pot-bellied pigs must be granted passage on airplanes if they are used for “emotional support” by their owners, states the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) draft manual on equity for the disabled in air travel.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/feds-airlines-must-let-passengers-fly-pigs-emotional-support
Ohhh wow! watch the Muslims run off the planes now. How long until CAIR files a lawsuit over this one?
I know someone who once sought comfort from a pot-bellied pig, but they were both really, really drunk at the time... And yes it was in Little Rock, AR...
Hmmmm, no cheese - but pigs are OK.
Well, that's one way to get Ham on the Hoof back home.
Maybe next time I fly..................
Right now, a former president is changing all of his phone numbers and locking down his Facebook profile to avoid a former intern's renewed efforts to work things out.
Team Sergeant
07-08-2012, 13:25
Adds a whole new meaning to:
"When pigs fly"
;)
Oldrotorhead
07-08-2012, 13:34
Pigs have been flying for a long time. Most wear tank tops and flip flops and knock you down running for the smoking area when the plane lands. :D
Badger52
07-09-2012, 07:07
Where's Pink Floyd when you need them?
Okay, so someone flies with their pig for emotional support, they take off and land at their destination .....
Would we then have to reclassify what "Swine Flew" means ????
:confused:
You know, when it comes right down to it, I don't see why the airlines wouldn't let people fly with their pigs for emotional support.
People have been kissing pigs for a long, long time.
*The last picture is actual evidence of a Muslim kissing a pig.
Perhaps it is only a matter of time until 'mule', in the term "drug mule", is replaced by 'pig'. "Excuse me sir, has anyone else had access to this pig or did you pack it yourself?"
Personally I have never flown with a PIG, though many a man I respect certainly has.
In these dangerous times I could see the "emotional support" argument.