PDA

View Full Version : Indicators you are Terroist or Criminal Extremist


Paslode
08-30-2010, 06:53
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36425924/Investigating-Terrorism-and-Criminal-Extremism-Terms-and-Concepts-DOJ-2005-2009


Interesting to what and who is included in the DOJ guide to the Domestic EVIL that lurks.....Flags are interesting! One high note the The New Black Panther Party for Self Defense is included. On the down side ACORN, SPLC, ADL, Green Peace, Code Pink, SEIU and Flag Burners and Flag burning is not included as EVIL.

Richard
08-30-2010, 07:54
FWIW - this is not a "DOJ Guide" - it is a document produced under a grant to:

Copyright 2005–2009 Institute for Intergovernmental Research®. All rights reserved. For additional information, please contact IIR at Post Ofce Box 12729, Tallahassee, FL 32317, (850) 385-0600, or www.slatt.org.

It also says:

This project was supported by Grant No. 2007-NC-BX-K002 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the US Department of Justice.

From the SLATT web-site:

Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer
This Web site is funded through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies and any services or tools provided).


...Flag Burners and Flag burning is not included as EVIL.

:rolleyes:

...Terroist...

So we've begun targeting card reading fortune tellers now? :D

And so it goes...

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Paslode
08-30-2010, 09:20
It also says:

This project was supported by Grant No. 2007-NC-BX-K002 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the US Department of Justice.

From the SLATT web-site:

Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer
This Web site is funded through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies and any services or tools provided).



Nice attention to detail Sir! You have a eye for the fine print. ;)

With that in mind....why fund it, if they are not going to use it :rolleyes:

Richard
08-30-2010, 09:29
With that in mind....why fund it, if they are not going to use it :rolleyes:

A wide variety of things get funded under the auspices of government and non-profit grants - some prove useful; many do not.

Richard :munchin

JJ_BPK
08-30-2010, 10:19
Nice attention to detail Sir! You have a eye for the fine print. ;)

With that in mind....why fund it, if they are not going to use it :rolleyes:

It allowed the POTUS to knock down the un-employment numbers by 10K :munchin

Richard
08-30-2010, 10:27
It allowed the POTUS to knock down the un-employment numbers by 10K :munchin

The "Copyright" and "Grant No." for this document would indicate an initial FY2005 and supplemental FY2007 awarding by the DOJ under the administration which was in existence during those years. ;)

And so it goes...

Richard :munchin

Dozer523
08-30-2010, 10:38
It allowed the POTUS to knock down the un-employment numbers by 10K :munchinThe "Copyright" and "Grant No." for this document would indicate an initial FY2005 and supplemental FY2007 awarding by the DOJ under the administration which was in existence during those years. ;)

And so it goes...

Richard :munchin And there ware those who said GWB was "just phoning in" the last few years. Maybe he anticipated a spike in unemployment.

Paslode
08-30-2010, 12:13
The "Copyright" and "Grant No." for this document would indicate an initial FY2005 and supplemental FY2007 awarding by the DOJ under the administration which was in existence during those years. ;)

And so it goes...

Richard :munchin


Might be the reason the New Black Panther's were included in this edition :D

Seriously though, this has sparked my interest in what these organizations do, why they do it and why the Fed's sponsor them, yet do not endorse these entities and the product is not used for official purposes.

Maybe propaganda ;)

tonyz
08-30-2010, 12:40
Seriously though, this has sparked my interest in what these organizations do, why they do it and why the Fed's sponsor them, yet do not endorse these entities and the product is not used for official purposes.

MOO, the relatively standard disclaimer can limit potential blow-back - it creates "plausible deniabilty" - you never know what you're going to get or what someone is going to come up with - on any given project.

At the agency level, it is not uncommon for an issue to be briefed internally, but the report be held in draft form only...just in case - "...it's just a draft."

Disclaimers, the use of drafts, etc., etc., are considered realtively standard tools for agency heads to potentially distance themselves from some "unusual" ideas that staff (who the agency head has probably never met) can come up with on occasion. It's just an accepted (and necessary) part of the game.

Paslode
08-30-2010, 20:45
MOO, the relatively standard disclaimer can limit potential blow-back - it creates "plausible deniabilty" - you never know what you're going to get or what someone is going to come up with - on any given project.

At the agency level, it is not uncommon for an issue to be briefed internally, but the report be held in draft form only...just in case - "...it's just a draft."

Disclaimers, the use of drafts, etc., etc., are considered realtively standard tools for agency heads to potentially distance themselves from some "unusual" ideas that staff (who the agency head has probably never met) can come up with on occasion. It's just an accepted (and necessary) part of the game.

I think you nailed with the last two word the GAME.

I am thinking that work environment might require a ready supply of antacid.

alright4u
08-31-2010, 02:23
FWIW - this is not a "DOJ Guide" - it is a document produced under a grant to:

Copyright 2005–2009 Institute for Intergovernmental Research®. All rights reserved. For additional information, please contact IIR at Post Ofce Box 12729, Tallahassee, FL 32317, (850) 385-0600, or www.slatt.org.

It also says:

This project was supported by Grant No. 2007-NC-BX-K002 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the US Department of Justice.

From the SLATT web-site:

Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer
This Web site is funded through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies and any services or tools provided).




:rolleyes:



So we've begun targeting card reading fortune tellers now? :D

And so it goes...

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Amazing we paid for this POS.