PDA

View Full Version : Taliban No. 2 Captured In Karachi


incarcerated
02-15-2010, 22:42
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/world/asia/16intel.html

Secret Joint Raid Captures Taliban’s Top Commander

By MARK MAZZETTI and DEXTER FILKINS
Published: February 15, 2010
WASHINGTON — The Taliban’s top military commander was captured several days ago in Karachi, Pakistan, in a secret joint operation by Pakistani and American intelligence forces, according to American government officials.

The commander, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, is an Afghan described by American officials as the most significant Taliban figure to be detained since the American-led war in Afghanistan started more than eight years ago. He ranks second in influence only to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the Taliban’s founder and a close associate of Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mullah Baradar has been in Pakistani custody for several days, with American and Pakistani intelligence officials both taking part in interrogations, according to the officials.

It was unclear whether he was talking, but the officials said his capture had provided a window into the Taliban and could lead to other senior officials. Most immediately, they hope he will provide the whereabouts of Mullah Omar, the one-eyed cleric who is the group’s spiritual leader.

Disclosure of Mullah Baradar’s capture came as American and Afghan forces were in the midst of a major offensive in southern Afghanistan.

His capture could cripple the Taliban’s military operations, at least in the short term, said Bruce O. Riedel, a former C.I.A. officer who last spring led the Obama administration’s Afghanistan and Pakistan policy review.

Details of the raid remain murky, but officials said that it had been carried out by Pakistan’s military spy agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, and that C.I.A. operatives had accompanied the Pakistanis.

The New York Times learned of the operation on Thursday, but delayed reporting it at the request of White House officials, who contended that making it public would end a hugely successful intelligence-gathering effort. The officials said that the group’s leaders had been unaware of Mullah Baradar’s capture and that if it became public they might cover their tracks and become more careful about communicating with each other.

The Times is publishing the news now because White House officials acknowledged that the capture of Mullah Baradar was becoming widely known in the region.

Several American government officials gave details about the raid on the condition that they not be named, because the operation was classified.

American officials believe that besides running the Taliban’s military operations, Mullah Baradar runs the group’s leadership council, often called the Quetta Shura because its leaders for years have been thought to be hiding near Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan Province in Pakistan.

The participation of Pakistan’s spy service could suggest a new level of cooperation from Pakistan’s leaders, who have been ambivalent about American efforts to crush the Taliban. Increasingly, the Americans say, senior leaders in Pakistan, including the chief of its army, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, have gradually come around to the view that they can no longer support the Taliban in Afghanistan — as they have quietly done for years — without endangering themselves. Indeed, American officials have speculated that Pakistani security officials could have picked up Mullah Baradar long ago.

The officials said that Pakistan was leading the interrogation of Mullah Baradar, but that Americans were also involved. The conditions of the questioning are unclear. In its first week in office, the Obama administration banned harsh interrogations like waterboarding by Americans, but the Pakistanis have long been known to subject prisoners to brutal questioning.

American intelligence officials believe that elements within Pakistan’s security services have covertly supported the Taliban with money and logistical help — largely out of a desire to retain some ally inside Afghanistan for the inevitable day when the Americans leave.

The ability of the Taliban’s top leaders to operate relatively freely inside Pakistan has for years been a source of friction between the ISI and the C.I.A. Americans have complained that they have given ISI operatives the precise locations of Taliban leaders, but that the Pakistanis usually refuse to act.

The Pakistanis have countered that the American intelligence was often outdated, or that faulty information had been fed to the United States by Afghanistan’s intelligence service.

For the moment it is unclear how the capture of Mullah Baradar will affect the overall direction of the Taliban, who have so far refused to disavow Al Qaeda and to accept the Afghan Constitution. American officials have hoped to win over some midlevel members of the group.

Mr. Riedel, the former C.I.A. official, said that he had not heard about Mullah Baradar’s capture before being contacted by The Times, but that the raid constituted a “sea change in Pakistani behavior.”

In recent weeks, American officials have said they have seen indications that the Pakistani military and spy services may finally have begun to distance themselves from the Taliban. One Obama administration official said Monday that the White House had “no reason to think that anybody was double-dealing at all” in aiding in the capture of Mullah Baradar.

A parade of American officials traveling to the Pakistani capital have made the case that the Afghan Taliban are now aligned with groups — like the Pakistani Taliban — that threaten the stability of the Pakistani government.

Mullah Baradar oversees the group’s operations across its primary area of activity in southern and western Afghanistan. While some of the insurgent groups active in Afghanistan receive only general guidance from their leaders, the Taliban are believed to be somewhat hierarchical, with lower-ranking field commanders often taking directions and orders from their leaders across the border.

In an attempt to improve the Taliban’s image both inside the country and abroad, Mullah Baradar last year helped issue a “code of conduct” for Taliban fighters. The handbook, small enough to be carried in the pocket of each Taliban foot soldier, gave specific guidance about topics including how to avoid civilian casualties, how to win the hearts and minds of villagers, and the necessity of limiting suicide attacks to avoid a backlash.

In recent months, a growing number of Taliban leaders are believed to have fled to Karachi, a sprawling, chaotic city in southern Pakistan hundreds of miles from the turbulence of the Afghan frontier. A diplomat based in Kabul, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said in an interview last month that Mullah Omar had moved to Karachi, and that several of his colleagues were there, too.

The leadership council, which includes more than a dozen of the Taliban’s best-known leaders, charts the overall direction of the war, assigns Taliban “shadow governors” to run many Afghan provinces and districts, and chooses battlefield commanders. It also oversees a number of subcommittees that direct other aspects of the war, like political, religious and military affairs.

According to Wahid Muzhda, a former Taliban official in Kabul who stays in touch with former colleagues, the council meets every three or four months to plot strategy. As recently as three years ago, he said, the council had 19 members. Since then, six have been killed or captured. Others have since filled the empty seats, he said.

Among the council members killed were Mullah Dadullah, who died during a raid by NATO and Afghan forces in 2007. Among the captured were Mullah Obaidullah, the Taliban defense minister, who reported to Mr. Baradar.

“The only man more powerful than Baradar is Omar,” Mr. Muzhda said. “He and Omar cannot meet very often because of security reasons, but they have a very good relationship.”

Western and Afghan officials familiar with the workings of the Taliban’s leadership have described Mullah Baradar as one of the Taliban’s most approachable leaders, and the one most ready to negotiate with the Afghan government.

Mediators who have worked to resolve kidnappings and other serious issues have often approached the Taliban leadership through him.

As in the case of the reclusive Mullah Omar, the public details of Mullah Baradar’s life are murky. According to an Interpol alert, he was born in 1968 in Weetmak, a village in Afghanistan’s Oruzgan Province. Terrorism experts describe him as a skilled military leader who runs many high-level meetings of the Taliban’s top commanders in Afghanistan....

Shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, Mullah Baradar was assigned by Mullah Omar to assume overall command of Taliban forces in northern Afghanistan. In that role, he oversaw a large group of battle-hardened Arab and foreign fighters who were based in the northern cities of Kunduz and Mazar-i-Sharif.

In November 2001, as Taliban forces collapsed after the American invasion, Mullah Baradar and several other senior Taliban leaders were captured by Afghan militia fighters aligned with the United States. But Pakistani intelligence operatives intervened, and Mullah Baradar and the other Taliban leaders were released, according to a senior official of the Northern Alliance, the group of Afghans aligned with the United States.

Mark Mazzetti reported from Washington, and Dexter Filkins from Kabul, Afghanistan. Carlotta Gall contributed reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan.

Richard
02-16-2010, 05:53
The New York Times learned of the operation on Thursday, but delayed reporting it at the request of White House officials, who contended that making it public would end a hugely successful intelligence-gathering effort. The officials said that the group’s leaders had been unaware of Mullah Baradar’s capture and that if it became public they might cover their tracks and become more careful about communicating with each other.

The Times is publishing the news now because White House officials acknowledged that the capture of Mullah Baradar was becoming widely known in the region.

Responsible journalism - a ray of hope. ;)

Richard

afchic
02-16-2010, 09:44
I wonder if he has been mirandized yet???

Utah Bob
02-16-2010, 10:27
I wonder if he has been mirandized yet???

Yes, and he's on a private Learjet on the way to New York. He'll take in a few Broadway shows and then hold a press conference after meeting with his legal team.
Look for him on Letterman next week.

FMF DOC
02-16-2010, 11:39
1. Still how did the New York Times find out before the raid. That a serious problem even though they did not print it.

2. Don't let him give himself a bloody lip and say he was mistreated.:munchin

Marina
02-16-2010, 12:52
Outsourcing interrogation to the Pakistanis - that's a good one.

On the one hand, the administration gets to say they've tossed aside enhanced interrogation techniques. Obama doesn't torture.

OTOH, POTUS is tough on terrorists and gets intel to stop future attacks.

Either way, Obama claims moral highground. :rolleyes:

BUT, capturing not killing a HVT is a change from recent policy of drone attacks. "Dead terrorists tell no tales." Obama made the decision that buying Baradar alive was more vital than taking him out altogether. Or maybe the Pakis drew the line at drone attacks in downtown Karachi.

Good discussion (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292097-4) on this at CSPAN today.

echoes
02-16-2010, 16:46
The Taliban’s top military commander was captured several days ago in Karachi, Pakistan, in a secret joint operation by Pakistani and American intelligence forces, according to American government officials.

Am going to focus my comment by saying, WELL DONE SOLDIERS, KICK SOME ASS!!!:lifter :cool:

Holly

The Reaper
02-16-2010, 19:28
All I have to thell them is that red is positive, and black is negative.

Best of luck.

TR

jbour13
02-16-2010, 20:57
All I have to thell them is that red is positive, and black is negative.

Best of luck.

TR

And do all Westerners a favor and don't take pictures, videotape or audio anything related to this tard.

Gonna be an interesting year.

Gypsy
02-16-2010, 21:02
Outstanding job!


Next!

incarcerated
02-18-2010, 13:58
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7032343.ece

Pakistan captures two senior Taleban leaders

February 18, 2010
Jeremy Page, South Asia Correspondent
Pakistan has captured two more leaders of the Afghan Taleban, Afghan officials revealed today, in the latest indication of a new level of cooperation between US and Pakistani intelligence agencies.

Mullah Abdul Salam and Mullah Mir Mohammad were the “shadow governors” of the northern Afghan provinces of Kunduz and Baghlan respectively, running the Taleban’s increasingly powerful parallel administrations there.

They were detained 10 days ago by Pakistani intelligence agents in Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s south-western province of Baluchistan, according to Engineer Mohammad Omar, the official governor of Kunduz.

“Two other Taleban who seem to be their bodyguards were also captured with them,” he told The Times.

Pakistan has captured two more leaders of the Afghan Taleban, Afghan officials revealed today, in the latest indication of a new level of cooperation between US and Pakistani intelligence agencies.

Mullah Abdul Salam and Mullah Mir Mohammad were the “shadow governors” of the northern Afghan provinces of Kunduz and Baghlan respectively, running the Taleban’s increasingly powerful parallel administrations there.

They were detained 10 days ago by Pakistani intelligence agents in Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s south-western province of Baluchistan, according to Engineer Mohammad Omar, the official governor of Kunduz.

“Two other Taleban who seem to be their bodyguards were also captured with them,” he told The Times.

The capture of Mullah Salam, 35, is especially significant as he had commanded the Taleban across all of northern and north-western Afghanistan and masterminded many attacks on German forces based in Kunduz.

Mohammad Dawood, the head of Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security in Kunduz, also said that Mullah Salam had been arrested by Pakistani intelligence agents.

The two men’s detention appears to have coincided with that of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar - the Taleban’s second-in-command - in a joint US-Pakistani raid in the south-western city of Karachi.

The US, Afghan and Pakistani governments have yet to comment on the reported arrest of the two men, who both reported to Mullah Baradar - the Taleban’s military chief.

But if confirmed, it would reinforce views that Pakistan has finally bowed to US pressure to take action against Afghan Taleban leaders who US officials say have been sheltering on its territory for years.

The apparent breakthrough comes as British, US and Afghan forces are engaged in Operation Moshtarak - billed as their biggest assault on the Taleban since the US-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

One possible reason for Pakistan’s change of heart is that it fears the operation could trigger a flood of militants and refugees across the border to Baluchistan, destabilising a region already racked by a decades-long separatist insurgency.

Yousuf Raza Gilani, Pakistan’s Prime Minister, raised the matter today in talks in Islamabad with Richard Holbrooke, the US special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to Mr Gilani’s office.

Mr Gilani expressed hope that, “Pakistan’s concerns on account of spill-over of refugees and militants from Helmand into south-western Baluchistan and the northwest will be kept in view”.

He called for “enhanced coordination and cooperation” with Pakistan’s armed forces and pressed for a quicker release of the $7.5 billion in aid that the United States has pledged to Pakistan over the next five years.

Pakistan backed the US-led War on Terror in late 2001 and has received more than $12 billion in American aid since then in exchange for cooperating in the fight against al-Qaeda and Taleban militants.

But US officials have often accused elements in Pakistan’s military of shielding the Afghan Taleban leadership either because they share its radical Islamist ideology or want to use it as a proxy after foreign troops leave Afghanistan.

US officials had frequently alleged over the last few months that Taleban leaders were sheltering in Quetta and Karachi, prompting fierce denials from Pakistani military and civilian officials.

Some analysts say General Ashfaq Kayani, Pakistan’s army chief, has finally been persuaded that at least some Taleban leaders represent a threat to Pakistan’s national security.

However, Pakistan’s foreign minister denied today that the arrest of Mullah Baradar was done under US pressure.

“We have done it because it is in our interests to do so,” said Shah Mehmood Qureshi in the first comments about the arrest from a senior Pakistani official.

“We do not want to see the Talebanisation of Pakistan,” he said. “This is service in a common cause.”

Underscoring the continuing Taleban threat to Pakistan, a bomb blast at a mosque in the north-western Khyber region killed 29 people including some militants today.

Meanwhile, at least three more people were killed in a suspected US missile strike on a house in the tribal region of North Waziristan - now considered the main militant stronghold in Pakistan.

Richard
02-24-2010, 08:32
Was the Taliban's Captured No. 2 on the Outs with Mullah Omar?
Tim McGirk, Time, 23 Feb 2010

Since the capture of the Taliban's purported second in command by Pakistani forces, military relations between Islamabad and Washington have appeared to be on an upswing. Not too long ago, U.S. insistence that Pakistan step up its cooperation in the fight against the Afghan Taliban had riled the military bigwigs in the south Asian nation — Pakistan's military helped create Mullah Omar and his Taliban fighters in Afghanistan in the mid-1990s and have surreptitiously supported them, for the most part, ever since. The ties have remained testy. When army chief Ashfaq Kayani, the most powerful man in Pakistan, was in Washington a few months ago, General David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command, remarked, "We're your only friends in Washington." Kayani reportedly replied, "Your friendship is exactly what's causing me headaches back home."

But the arrest of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, Mullah Mohammad Omar's vaunted No. 2, seems to have reversed the momentum. Talking to TIME inside the 2,000-year-old Bala Hissar fortress jutting above Peshawar's old bazaar, Tariq Khan, frontier corps commander major general, admitted that "at first, that commitment with the Americans wasn't there." Now, however, Khan says the U.S. and Pakistani forces along the border are sharing intelligence "in real time, as it's happening."

Counter-arguments abound, of course. There are two interpretations regarding Baradar, who was leaving a seminary in a dingy slum outside Karachi when Pakistani operatives, acting on a tip from the CIA, picked him up. The first theory is that Pakistan owed the U.S. big time for knocking out one of their troublesome insurgents and could not dither when the CIA demanded that Baradar be grabbed. But the second theory, put out by local Pakistani journalists with reliable Taliban contacts, suggests that Baradar was dispensable for the Pakistani intelligence since he broke last December with Omar. According to Peshawar journalist Rahimullah Yousufzai, Taliban sources said the two old comrades split over Baradar's supposed openness to talks with the Kabul government of Hamid Karzai, whom Omar and the Pakistanis despise. Also, Baradar was reportedly upset that Omar had shrugged off his warnings not to put too much trust in the Pakistanis. After Baradar's capture, says Yousufzai, "all the Taliban will be thinking, Who's next?"

That fear is exactly what the U.S. military command wants to stir in the minds of Taliban leaders. Afghan Taliban commanders may now hesitate before heading to Pakistan for refuge. Meanwhile, the U.S. is being generous with its intelligence. Pakistani military sources say the U.S. has passed on GPS coordinates of the bases used by the Pakistani Taliban — extremist tribesmen who see Islamabad as their enemy No. 1, not the NATO troops across the border in Afghanistan — so that the Pakistani military under General Khan can hammer them with artillery or aircraft strikes. These sources say that several dozen American "trainers" are passing on intelligence on the Pakistani Taliban that was gleaned from the eye-in-the-sky drones.

It was a U.S. drone strike earlier this month that either killed or severely wounded Hakimullah Mehsud, head of the Pakistani Taliban. Knocking Mehsud out of commission may have been the favor Islamabad was repaying with the capture of Baradar and three Afghan Taliban "shadow" governors who were operating out of Pakistan. Mehsud had masterminded a suicide-bombing campaign that hit schools, police stations, bazaars and garrisons across the country, killing hundreds. (On Tuesday, another Taliban leader, Mullah Abdul Qadir, ex-governor of Afghanistan's Nangahar province, was reportedly arrested, though neither Pakistan nor the Taliban spokesman would confirm the capture.)

The U.S. assistance is paying dividends for Pakistan in the fight against its domestic insurgency. Inside the forbidding mountain ranges along Pakistan's Afghan border, "the drones can hit where the Pakistani military cannot," says Talaat Masood, a retired general and independent military analyst in Islamabad. On Feb. 19, U.S. aerial surveillance helped the Pakistanis find and kill more than 30 militants in a bombing run in a forested valley in South Waziristan, which, until a major Pakistani offensive last October, had been crawling with Pakistani and Afghan Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters.

Washington's newfound friendship with Islamabad could still fray over one particularly vicious Afghan clan. The NATO forces' most dangerous adversaries are the Haqqanis, who have sworn loyalty to Omar while operating semi-independently in the eastern Afghan provinces and also across the border in Pakistan. Since the days of the jihad against the Soviets, Pakistani spy service the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has kept close ties with the Haqqanis. Now the Pakistanis are resisting demands by Washington to clear the Haqqanis out of their lair in the Pakistani territory of North Waziristan. Pakistani officials insist they will — but within six months. For now, they say, their 140,000 troops are too busy fighting the Pakistani Taliban in the tribal agencies of Orakzai, Bajaur and South Waziristan to tackle the Haqqani clan.

Privately, some army officers present a different perspective. They see the Haqqanis as future players in any deal that might be struck between Karzai and the resistance — and believe it is crucial that the Pakistani military remain close to the clan in order to preserve Islamabad's influence in Afghanistan. That is not a result the U.S. wants. The Americans blame the young Haqqani warlord Sirajuddin for the most lethal attacks, many of them by suicide bombers, on NATO forces around Kabul. U.S. intelligence suspects that the Haqqanis are sheltering dozens of al-Qaeda fighters.

And so while U.S.-Pakistan relations are better now, they are still fraught. As U.S. special envoy Richard Holbrooke, a veteran of the Balkans and other bruising diplomatic acts, remarked wearily on Feb. 18, during his seventh swing through Islamabad, "This is the most complicated relation with an ally that I've ever experienced. I don't want to mislead you; it's still fragile."

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1967291,00.html

incarcerated
03-04-2010, 23:06
Was the Taliban's Captured No. 2 on the Outs with Mullah Omar?


http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Arrest+signal+Taliban+feud+McChrystal/2641299/story.html

Arrest of No 2 may signal Taliban feud: McChrystal

By Peter Graff, Reuters
March 4, 2010
SPIN BOLDAK, Afghanistan - The arrest of the Afghan Taliban's former number two figure may have been the result of an internal feud and purge among Taliban leaders, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces said on Thursday.

The arrest in Pakistan of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, in a U.S.-Pakistani operation confirmed last month, was described as a major intelligence coup and a possible sign Islamabad is becoming more willing to help fight Afghan militants.

A theory in some intelligence circles, however, is that Baradar was captured only after he had already effectively been expelled from the Taliban after an internal tribal feud, leaving behind a more radical rump Taliban leadership.

U.S. and NATO commander General Stanley McChrystal said it was not entirely clear why Pakistan arrested Baradar now, but that an internal Taliban feud was one plausible explanation.

"I think that's very possible," McChrystal said in an interview with Reuters and the New York Times, when asked about reports that an internal Taliban purge had led to the arrest. "I did hear that. I can't confirm it but I find it possible."

"Whether an internal feud within the Quetta Shura produced Baradur being captured, again, I can't confirm that but I find it plausible."

Washington refers to the main Taliban leadership as the "Quetta Shura", after the Pakistani frontier city where it says the militants are based.

"I'm glad that it happened, but I'm not prepared to tell you that I know why at that particular time he was arrested. Again: I think having him out of circulation is positive," McChrystal said.