PDA

View Full Version : The History Channel's "The People Speak"


Streck-Fu
12-15-2009, 11:52
Richard's "History Student" thread came to mind when I came across this but did not want to hijack that thread.

As a parallel discussion related to the lack of History education in our schools, we end up with material like this from Howard Zinn and aired on The History Channel.

This appears to be perfect example of revisionism motivated by political ideology and complete lack of understanding what they are actually reading.

LINK (http://www.calendarlive.com/tv/la-et-people-speak12-2009dec12,0,5217381.story)

'The People Speak'
The dramatic readings on the History Channel show make the case that democracy is a political activity.


By MARY McNAMARA, Television Critic

The history of the United States is, essentially, one of dissent. Certain elected officials may have managed to establish legacies of transformation, but real change in this country has inevitably begun not with politicians but the peanut gallery.

Workers and writers, activists and artists, intellectuals, immigrants and everyday people who found one situation or another intolerable and decided to do something about it. No serious social or political change in this country -- not independence, not abolition, not women's suffrage or the minimum wage or civil rights or the New Deal -- came about without anger and protest and, often as not, violence.

ADVERTISEMENT
Democracy is not a political theory, it's a political activity.

That is the leitmotif of “The People Speak,” a series of dramatic readings from inspiring historical documents that airs on the History Channel on Sunday night. Based on Howard Zinn's revisionist "A People's History of the United States," "The People Speak" employs the talents of Hollywood heavy hitters, including Morgan Freeman, Matt Damon, Marisa Tomei, Don Cheadle, Josh Brolin, Sandra Oh, Viggo Mortensen, Bob Dylan and Bruce Springsteen, and provides a striking, exhilarating and at times horrifying reminder of not just our indomitable ability to change but also this country's collective history of oppression.

According to Zinn, who narrates, the revolutionary spirit that produced the Declaration of Independence had already been compromised by the time the Constitution replaced "pursuit of happiness" with "property," assuming a ruling class of white, male property owners. Over the next 250 years, individuals would fight to restore the proper definition of the word "equality."

Class division is a drumbeat throughout "The People Speak," which is a primer of liberal ideology with a decided bent toward socialism; no one's reading a few rousing passages of Ayn Rand's, for instance. The letters and journals and speeches selected cover the American timeline, from the abolitionists through AIDS activists, but the theme of personal and political enfranchisement, tolerance, peace and American humility is the consistent theme. Equal rights, protection of workers, protection of children, even rent control are celebrated while concepts such as patriotism -- the last refuge of scoundrels, according to pacifist and anarchist Emma Goldman -- and national security are portrayed as the whip and cattle prod used by the power elite. Even World War II is cast as a false model for American military domination.

The producers of "The People Speak," who include Brolin and Damon, clearly intend "The People Speak" as a wake-up call to Americans who feel that their duty as citizens begins and ends at the ballot box, but that call does not seem to include those of a more conservative nature.

Still, the reminder that no president, no Congress, no government ever solved a problem or righted an injustice until prodded into action by protest seems particularly resonant in the wake of President Obama's election, a feat many seemed to believe guaranteed instant, sweeping reformation.

"Power concedes nothing without a demand," said Frederick Douglass. "It never did and it never will."

Without exception, the performances are thrilling, but it is the authors, not the actors, who are the stars here. For a nation grown accustomed to weepy personal confession, to the cynical invective of political commentators on both the right and the left, and the carefully worded rhetoric of politicians, the eloquence, force and bluntness of people such as Susan B. Anthony, Douglass, César Chávez and Malcolm X are a shock to the system and a welcome reminder that when real change comes, it is neither gentle nor deferential.

Like the voices it showcases, "The People Speak" is clear in its politics: Everyone is entitled not only to equality under the law but also to share equally in the fruits of his or her collective labor. "Maybe a fella ain't got a soul of his own, but a piece of a big one," wrote John Steinbeck. "Two fighting back to back can fight through a mob . . . a dozen can make a demonstration . . . ten million their own country," wrote poet and novelist Marge Piercy.

Or in the simple words of Woody Guthrie, covered here, of course, by Springsteen: "This land is your land, this land is my land." Words we too often forget were, and are, revolutionary.

Streck-Fu
12-15-2009, 11:54
A second review from "Big Hollywood"...LINK (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/14/review-in-the-people-speak-some-everyday-people-are-more-equal-than-others/)

You can see the possibility that small acts multiplied by the millions can merge into great movements of social change. — So speaketh Howard Zinn in summing up the theme of last night’s two hour History Channel telecast of “The People Speak.” But like all Leftists, Zinn’s using a t-shirt ready face, focus group-tested platitudes, and cherry-picked bits of American history to further a monstrous ideology that will ensure all but a few Matt Damon-esque elites lose their liberties to Big Government overseers.

If you think about it, taken at face value, that Zinn quote personifies the Tea Party movement, doesn’t it? But what do you think Zinn and his fellow celebucrats think of those everyday people? That question can be answered in two words: Sarah and Palin:

A large portion of “The People Speak” celebrates “everyday” women who came from nowhere to fight the establishment and have their voices heard … and yet here’s Matt Damon trashing the self-made reformer from Alaska who took on her own party.

It’s important to keep in mind that in Zinn’s poseur-infested world, some who believe democracy is not a spectator sport are more equal than others.

I know, I know, what a shock — elitist hypocrisy from a bunch of celebrity millionaires calling for socialism. But big or small, nothing with these types is ever as advertised. Hell, the very foundation of “The People Speak” is an audacious lie. We’re told the program will introduce us to “dramatic and musical performances of the letters, diaries and speeches of everyday Americans.” You know, everyday Americans like Muhammad Ali, Neil Young, Woody Guthrie, Mark Twain, Susan B. Anthony, Dalton Trumbo, Frederick Douglas, Malcolm X, Susan Walker and John Steinbeck.

Looks as though the definition of “everyday American” now means someone famous who once wrote something the less famous would like to read for the History Channel.

Other than discovering that grunge music isn’t dead and seeing Marisa Tomei in a late-career performance where she keeps her clothes on, nothing in “The People Speak” surprised – including its lack of success as a piece of leftist agit-prop.

What worries me as the lights dim for the latest piece of Hollywood propaganda is what I call “The China Syndrome Standard.” In other words, is this latest going to be good enough to fulfill its mission in undermining America? Because it was a superb piece of filmmaking released just after the Three Mile Island incident, “The China Syndrome” had a major impact on our turning away from the safest and cleanest energy resource available. While France was building enough nuclear power plants to create over 70% of their energy, Jane Fonda and company effectively set us back decades.

So I worry because this is the kind of lightening in a bottle Hollywood Leftists keep trying to recreate. Thankfully, the kids Matt Damon and producer Chris Moore have targeted with their love letter to Zinn are going to be alright. “The People Speak” is no “China Syndrome.” In fact it’s closer to Michael Moore’s work where celebrity narcissism always seems to get in the way of Mission: Spread Chic Socialism.

Narrated throughout by Zinn, “The People Speak” offers some very powerful moments, especially during the sequences covering American slavery and segregation. But as the two hours roll on, the idea of having celebrities read the words of others becomes fairly tedious, especially when the readings are so look-at-me over the top they become uncomfortable to watch.

David Straitharn, Kerry Washington, Lupe Fiasco and the guy from Run DMC are especially melodramatic; Matt Damon’s predictably wooden (foolishly allowing himself to be compared to Henry Fonda with John Steinbeck’s “Wherever there’s a man.” monologue); and the musical interludes are so stuffed with stripped-down smug self-importance there has to be a “South Park” attack in the works. On the other hand, Marisa Tomei, Danny Glover, Jasmine Guy and Viggo Mortensen (until he pretentiously lays a little Spanish on us) do manage to stay out of the way of the material they’re performing.

Much of what’s read and sung is undeniably elegant and powerful. Few spoke with more power on issues of race than Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X, and the courthouse words of John Brown and Susan B. Anthony are filled with the kind of moral authority that’s unforgettable. But as with all things Leftist and Zinn, context is their kryptonite and nowhere is this more apparent than the sequences involving World War II and Vietnam.

No honest student of history would present the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as cruel attacks on civilians. The inevitable invasion of Japan would’ve killed many more Japanese civilians (not to mention American servicemen) than those two bombs, and Zinn’s proud contention that civil disobedience ended the war in Vietnam is especially disturbing. The anti-war protests ended with the withdrawal of our troops after the 1973 Paris Peace Accords. With U.S. financial backing, our South Vietnamese Allies were able to hang on to their country, but in 1975 that all ended when Congressional Democrats cut funding. This demoralized the South, emboldened the Communist North, and Saigon fell ushering in a four-year holocaust that took nearly two million innocent lives.

What kind of monsters take pride in such an outcome?

That would be Howard Zinn and his celeb-minions who — thankfully for America — are just a little too wrapped up in themselves to meet “The China Syndrome Standard.”