View Full Version : West Point = Enemy Camp?
Warrior-Mentor
12-02-2009, 09:45
Matthews asks if perhaps "West Point = Enemy Camp?"
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzdhYTY0MDRiYTBlYjVkOTAwMjE2YWM5OGU5OTg1MDA=
Perhaps some of our Liberal members can explain...
Goggles Pizano
12-02-2009, 10:03
I just saw that Sir and it was disgusting. It is evident these people no longer experience shame. Their citizenship cards should be revoked, and they can be shipped to venezuela to experience some of that fine totalitarianism they desire. Asshats all. :mad:
A reference to the military academies as a setting where a Republican would more likely be found waving the bloody flag for a cause than a Democrat - especially one as liberal as BHO? :confused:
Richard's $.02 :munchin
longrange1947
12-02-2009, 10:52
An idiot with a pen who is more interested in wearing his liberal creds on his sleeve than doing good reporting.
An American president who apologizes for the history of the US, and for its people?
Someone who doesn't particularly care for democracy, who leans toward socialism and government control of the people and their business?
Someone who grew up as a "citizen of the world", and not one of this country, with his allegiances more toward the sharing of what US citizens have, through their labors and sacrifices while defending other democracies?
Someone who wants to seize the assets of the nation and use those assets as currency to buy the loyalty of the dissatisfied who within?
Dear God, if West Point isn't the enemy camp, if any military installation doesn't oppose the degradation he plans for the US, we should worry.
The Reaper
12-02-2009, 11:49
Matthews asks if perhaps "West Point = Enemy Camp?"
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzdhYTY0MDRiYTBlYjVkOTAwMjE2YWM5OGU5OTg1MDA=
Perhaps some of our Liberal members can explain...
Maybe that is because the West Pointers have all sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
TR
Warrior-Mentor
12-02-2009, 12:14
Maybe that is because the West Pointers have all sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
TR
I thought POTUS did too??? :eek:
The Reaper
12-02-2009, 12:20
I thought POTUS did too??? :eek:
I think Holder told him that it was not binding. At least from his actions thus far, I would expect that he was not taking it seriously. Actually, his oath does not mention enemies.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Still campaigning, IMHO. Not leading, or governing.
TR
Warrior-Mentor
12-02-2009, 12:25
I think Holder told him that it was not binding. At least from his actions thus far, I would expect that he was not taking it seriously. Actually, his oath does not mention enemies.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Still campaigning, IMHO. Not leading, or governing.
TR
True. If the oath mentioned ENEMIES, he could use the federal governement to go after FOX News, West Point and any other political target of opportunity...
Bordercop
12-02-2009, 13:56
Here's the link:http: //www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/12/a_strange_venue_for_a_liberal.html
A 'strange venue' - for a liberal
David Jeffers
My late son Sergeant Eddie Jeffers wrote his now famous "Hope Rides Alone" about the likes of MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, and Chris Matthews.
I will watch the television and watch the Cindy Sheehans, and the Al Frankens, and the rest of the ignorant sheep of America spout off their mouths about a subject they know nothing about. It is their right, however, and it is a right that is defended by hundreds of thousands of boys and girls scattered across the world, far from home.
Many of those boys and girls my son wrote of were trained at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. What is described as the "world's premier leadership development institute" the Commander-in-Chief visited this storied institution to lay out his Afghan strategy to the very soldiers tasked with implementing the President's plan.
Whether or not Mr. Obama used this magnificent setting for political purposes or theatrical effect, it is fitting for the leader of the world's most powerful military to address the nation before cadets enrolled in the officer training that prepares them for the arduous and dangerous task of combat.
Most clear-thinking Americans understand a president going to a service academy to spell out a national security policy and that the reception to such an address would not be met with great enthusiasm. Unless of course you work for MSNBC.
I did not think my outrage towards Senator Kent Conrad could be topped anytime soon, but Chris Matthews was able to quell my anger towards the North Dakota Democrat. The focus of my ire and disdain is on a laser-like beam towards the man whose leg obviously did not experience the normal tingling sensation caused by the President.
Chris Matthews found Mr. Obama's speech at West Point "a strange venue" and equating it to "the enemy camp." Of course Matthews gave the obligatory off-handed compliment to the cadets:
"I watched the cadets, they were young kids - men and women who were committed to serving their country professionally it must be said, as officers." [Emphasis added.]
It must be said Chris? Do you find that a chore, somewhat burdensome for you?
Of course these beautiful Americans are "committed to serving their country professionally." From the day they enter the hallowed grounds of The Long Gray Line they "do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and bear true allegiance to the National Government; that I will maintain and defend the sovereignty of the United States."
To whom have you sworn your allegiance Mr. Matthews? Chris was upset because he "didn't see much excitement...didn't see a lot of warmth in that crowd out there." Perhaps tomorrow the Commandant of Cadets Brigadier General William E. Rapp can release a public apology for the lack of pep rally atmosphere during the President's speech to get them out of "the enemy camp" and back in "good guy land."
The vitriol from the Left has been on a collision course with Main Street America for sometime now. In the past, particularly with the military, the statists used the back alleys of innuendo and insinuation but now they are on hater's highway fearing not the backlash of military-loving Americans.
This is the silver-lining in the media's loathing of America. Whether it is CNN's embarrassing fact checking of an Obama skit performed by Saturday Night Live or MSNBC's unbridled disdain for our military, the scales are coming off America's eyes.
Many of the comments to my AT blog post about Senator Conrad's condescending remarks were very supportive of the military and very kind and encouraging to my family and me personally. One commenter rightly opines:
Yes, they are a hateful bunch, those leftists. As they believe they are getting closer and closer to taking over nearly every aspect of this Republic, their hate becomes ever more visible. They really wish that any and all opposition could be "made to go away."
Is that what motivated you to call West Point "the enemy camp" Mr. Matthews? Is the fact that you believe your socialist dreams would come true would it not be for us pesky Middle Americans who love democracy and loathe statism?
Does the fact that Mr. Obama did not receive from the Army Cadets your perceived deserving "warmth in the crowd out there" cause your hate to become "ever more visible"?
No doubt Mr. Matthews and MSNBC are working on the patented feeble and feigned "if I offended anyone by my remarks..." apology. It will not matter Mr. Matthews; you have revealed your heart to America.
Your comments were not a mere bad choice of words or a verbal slip; they were despicable. You won't be able to cover this by the tired liberal "we love the military and support the troops" mantra because you have no deeds to back up the words. The military is real big on deeds not words.
If you would like to do what one of those "it must be said" professional officers would do in a case like yours, try a straightforward "I apologize for my offensive remarks" approach.
No doubt that will be a strange venue for you.
Warrior-Mentor
12-03-2009, 09:41
West Point = Enemy Camp, Part II
SEE THE VIDEO:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/12/02/matthews_i_deeply_apologize_for_calling_west_point _the_enemy_camp.html
Those starched collar stocks on the Dress Grey tops make for a great place to rest one's chin when catching up on some much needed rest...I'm just saying...
Warrior-Mentor
12-03-2009, 12:29
Wool uniforms, lots of people in a small room, hot TV lights, at night, likely after an early morning start, with smoker PT sessions, and late night studying the night prior...yeah, that's a formula for staying awake...
deepblack 18x
12-03-2009, 12:39
Wool uniforms, lots of people in a small room, hot TV lights, at night, likely after an early morning start, with smoker PT sessions, and late night studying the night prior...yeah, that's a formula for staying awake...
Not to mention the speech was a bit dry and lacked emotion, I bet that helped their cause.