Richard
12-01-2009, 07:17
What now, Dai-uy?
Richard
In war, combat leaders have to determine how much risk to their own troops they should accept to prevent the death of innocent noncombatants.
In this case, a combat leader has to make a split-second decision. Did he do the right thing?
The mission
In March 2002, at the Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF) headquarters in Afghanistan, Lt. Cmdr. Tom Reynolds, USN, a SEAL officer in charge of the SEALs assigned to the JSOTF during Operation Enduring Freedom, was summoned by JSOTF Operations Officer Lieutenant Colonel Thompson to talk about a mission they had just received. A vehicle convoy — typically Toyota Land Cruiser-type SUVs and/or compact pickup trucks — of al-Qaida and Taliban terrorists was expected to be moving down a road about 70 miles south the next morning, apparently trying to escape from Afghanistan into Pakistan. Intelligence indicated ongoing allied operations were putting significant pressure on al-Qaida and Taliban forces in southeast Afghanistan, making local al-Qaida and Taliban movements and operations more and more difficult. The enemy already had realized that allied aircraft routinely targeted vehicles moving at night, so now they were seeking to blend in with the normal daytime traffic. It appeared the Taliban and al-Qaida were having some success escaping into Pakistan by blending in with the stream of refugees coming out of Afghanistan.
Intelligence sources also indicated the terrorists normally put their heavily armed men in lead vehicles as an armed reconnaissance element, while the leadership and their personal armed guards would follow some distance behind, maintaining communications with the lead vehicles about any problems they encountered. Also, and particularly worrisome, were indications that the terrorists probably were carrying Man-portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS), specifically Soviet-era SA-7 shoulder-fired missiles, which are particularly effective against helicopters, especially during daylight when helicopters are easy to spot.
The mission was to interdict the convoy, capture (if possible), and kill (if necessary) any suspected members of al-Qaida or the Taliban they might encounter.
Thompson already had contacted Maj. Mark Wyatt, XO of an Army H-47 helicopter squadron, who would look at the mission with Reynolds and his men. The land forces component commander wanted the mission concept in two hours. Reynolds knew he had limited time to plan, rehearse, and review contingencies with his team. Tight timelines had become standard, but Reynolds and his team were fully aware of the increased risk they assumed when they had less time to prepare.
Recent tragedy
The risks of rapid planning had become evident in an ugly incident two days earlier. Overhead surveillance had seen armed men around a walled compound, and corroborating intelligence had indicated this compound would be used for a meeting of high-level Taliban officials. A precision-guided missile was launched and struck the main building of the compound when the meeting was scheduled to take place. Reynolds and his men went into the compound minutes after the missile struck to gather any intelligence that remained, capture and treat any wounded, and determine whether any of the dead or wounded were key Taliban or al-Qaida leaders.
When they arrived, they discovered the dead had been noncombatants — farmers and their families who were living in the compound. They found personal firearms that virtually all rural Afghanis carry for protection. Reynolds and his men were shaken by the gruesome results of this miscalculation: elderly people, farmers, women, and children with no apparent connection to the enemy were dead. After determining that there was no exploitable intelligence, Reynolds and his men returned to base, and he reported to his superiors what had happened, including his dismay at the mistake.
The plan
Reynolds and his team worked out a plan. There would be a total of three helos: Wyatt would be the lead helo pilot for the mission, and Reynolds would be in Wyatt’s helo (chalk one). Chalks two and three would carry the rest of the SEALs and be led by Reynolds’ assistant officer in charge and platoon chief, respectively. They talked through the contingencies with the pilots, went over the map, and had the intelligence crew coordinate with a Navy P-3 aircraft doing overhead surveillance.
A difficult part of the mission was to interdict the convoy in such a way as to surprise the occupants of the vehicles, and offering the opportunity for them to surrender without putting Reynolds’ men at risk. “Capture if possible, kill if necessary” always is tricky; it frequently requires a split-second decision and a clear indicator of hostile intent as well as an intuitive sense of threat.
They would be taking off at 6:45 a.m. the next day and flying to a point near the road where they would loiter at a low altitude, visually and audibly sheltered from the road by the mountains, and wait for a cue from a P-3 watching the road. When the P-3 saw the convoy, it would notify the helos and vector them to the vehicles on the road. The helos then would move in under the cover of the mountains and surprise the convoy, quickly determine whether to take the vehicles under fire or, if in doubt, land and put the SEALs on the ground and let them make the final determination. The helos would be available to provide cover fire or extraction, as required.
Rules of engagement
Before submitting his mission plan, Reynolds went to see Colonel Smith, the JSOTF commander, to discuss his perspective for this mission. With the tragedy of the recent mission still on his mind, Reynolds wanted to know how certain the intelligence reports were, and whether the rules of engagement had changed. The rules of engagement define the circumstances under which lethal force can be used and the restrictions in the use of that force. Smith said he understood the intelligence to be quite reliable and the rules of engagement hadn’t changed: If the vehicles they encounter demonstrate hostile intent by displaying or firing weapons, they are legitimate targets. Smith said the reason higher headquarters wanted the JSOTF to send helos and SEALs to do this mission, instead of targeting the convoy from a distance, was to try to avoid repeating the mistake from two days ago. That said, Smith reminded Reynolds that his tactics must account for the desire to bring back prisoners if at all possible, without unduly risking the lives of any of his men. Smith also reiterated to Reynolds that the rules of engagement gave him all the guidance he needed.
That was what Reynolds wanted to hear. He believed the rules of engagement, as they currently stood, made sense and gave him and his team the latitude to exercise their professional judgment to complete the mission and stay alive.
Mission day
Early the next morning, the SEALs embarked the H-47s, and after all systems checked out and the pilots had established communications with the P-3, they took off and headed for the designated loiter point. After about 40 minutes of flight time, they arrived at the point, again checked in with the P-3, and began flying in low, slow circles far enough away from the road so as not to be heard, yet close enough to respond quickly when called by the P-3.
Reynolds had been through this drill many times before. Sitting in the helo with a headset on, he waited for the call. He mentally walked through the plan for the operation and its various contingencies: how they would make their approach to the convoy, how quickly they would have to determine threat level and response. How far back would the trail vehicle be with the so-called leaders? Would they stumble upon one of the key Taliban or al-Qaida leaders? Did they really have SA-7s?
(cont'd)
Richard
In war, combat leaders have to determine how much risk to their own troops they should accept to prevent the death of innocent noncombatants.
In this case, a combat leader has to make a split-second decision. Did he do the right thing?
The mission
In March 2002, at the Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF) headquarters in Afghanistan, Lt. Cmdr. Tom Reynolds, USN, a SEAL officer in charge of the SEALs assigned to the JSOTF during Operation Enduring Freedom, was summoned by JSOTF Operations Officer Lieutenant Colonel Thompson to talk about a mission they had just received. A vehicle convoy — typically Toyota Land Cruiser-type SUVs and/or compact pickup trucks — of al-Qaida and Taliban terrorists was expected to be moving down a road about 70 miles south the next morning, apparently trying to escape from Afghanistan into Pakistan. Intelligence indicated ongoing allied operations were putting significant pressure on al-Qaida and Taliban forces in southeast Afghanistan, making local al-Qaida and Taliban movements and operations more and more difficult. The enemy already had realized that allied aircraft routinely targeted vehicles moving at night, so now they were seeking to blend in with the normal daytime traffic. It appeared the Taliban and al-Qaida were having some success escaping into Pakistan by blending in with the stream of refugees coming out of Afghanistan.
Intelligence sources also indicated the terrorists normally put their heavily armed men in lead vehicles as an armed reconnaissance element, while the leadership and their personal armed guards would follow some distance behind, maintaining communications with the lead vehicles about any problems they encountered. Also, and particularly worrisome, were indications that the terrorists probably were carrying Man-portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS), specifically Soviet-era SA-7 shoulder-fired missiles, which are particularly effective against helicopters, especially during daylight when helicopters are easy to spot.
The mission was to interdict the convoy, capture (if possible), and kill (if necessary) any suspected members of al-Qaida or the Taliban they might encounter.
Thompson already had contacted Maj. Mark Wyatt, XO of an Army H-47 helicopter squadron, who would look at the mission with Reynolds and his men. The land forces component commander wanted the mission concept in two hours. Reynolds knew he had limited time to plan, rehearse, and review contingencies with his team. Tight timelines had become standard, but Reynolds and his team were fully aware of the increased risk they assumed when they had less time to prepare.
Recent tragedy
The risks of rapid planning had become evident in an ugly incident two days earlier. Overhead surveillance had seen armed men around a walled compound, and corroborating intelligence had indicated this compound would be used for a meeting of high-level Taliban officials. A precision-guided missile was launched and struck the main building of the compound when the meeting was scheduled to take place. Reynolds and his men went into the compound minutes after the missile struck to gather any intelligence that remained, capture and treat any wounded, and determine whether any of the dead or wounded were key Taliban or al-Qaida leaders.
When they arrived, they discovered the dead had been noncombatants — farmers and their families who were living in the compound. They found personal firearms that virtually all rural Afghanis carry for protection. Reynolds and his men were shaken by the gruesome results of this miscalculation: elderly people, farmers, women, and children with no apparent connection to the enemy were dead. After determining that there was no exploitable intelligence, Reynolds and his men returned to base, and he reported to his superiors what had happened, including his dismay at the mistake.
The plan
Reynolds and his team worked out a plan. There would be a total of three helos: Wyatt would be the lead helo pilot for the mission, and Reynolds would be in Wyatt’s helo (chalk one). Chalks two and three would carry the rest of the SEALs and be led by Reynolds’ assistant officer in charge and platoon chief, respectively. They talked through the contingencies with the pilots, went over the map, and had the intelligence crew coordinate with a Navy P-3 aircraft doing overhead surveillance.
A difficult part of the mission was to interdict the convoy in such a way as to surprise the occupants of the vehicles, and offering the opportunity for them to surrender without putting Reynolds’ men at risk. “Capture if possible, kill if necessary” always is tricky; it frequently requires a split-second decision and a clear indicator of hostile intent as well as an intuitive sense of threat.
They would be taking off at 6:45 a.m. the next day and flying to a point near the road where they would loiter at a low altitude, visually and audibly sheltered from the road by the mountains, and wait for a cue from a P-3 watching the road. When the P-3 saw the convoy, it would notify the helos and vector them to the vehicles on the road. The helos then would move in under the cover of the mountains and surprise the convoy, quickly determine whether to take the vehicles under fire or, if in doubt, land and put the SEALs on the ground and let them make the final determination. The helos would be available to provide cover fire or extraction, as required.
Rules of engagement
Before submitting his mission plan, Reynolds went to see Colonel Smith, the JSOTF commander, to discuss his perspective for this mission. With the tragedy of the recent mission still on his mind, Reynolds wanted to know how certain the intelligence reports were, and whether the rules of engagement had changed. The rules of engagement define the circumstances under which lethal force can be used and the restrictions in the use of that force. Smith said he understood the intelligence to be quite reliable and the rules of engagement hadn’t changed: If the vehicles they encounter demonstrate hostile intent by displaying or firing weapons, they are legitimate targets. Smith said the reason higher headquarters wanted the JSOTF to send helos and SEALs to do this mission, instead of targeting the convoy from a distance, was to try to avoid repeating the mistake from two days ago. That said, Smith reminded Reynolds that his tactics must account for the desire to bring back prisoners if at all possible, without unduly risking the lives of any of his men. Smith also reiterated to Reynolds that the rules of engagement gave him all the guidance he needed.
That was what Reynolds wanted to hear. He believed the rules of engagement, as they currently stood, made sense and gave him and his team the latitude to exercise their professional judgment to complete the mission and stay alive.
Mission day
Early the next morning, the SEALs embarked the H-47s, and after all systems checked out and the pilots had established communications with the P-3, they took off and headed for the designated loiter point. After about 40 minutes of flight time, they arrived at the point, again checked in with the P-3, and began flying in low, slow circles far enough away from the road so as not to be heard, yet close enough to respond quickly when called by the P-3.
Reynolds had been through this drill many times before. Sitting in the helo with a headset on, he waited for the call. He mentally walked through the plan for the operation and its various contingencies: how they would make their approach to the convoy, how quickly they would have to determine threat level and response. How far back would the trail vehicle be with the so-called leaders? Would they stumble upon one of the key Taliban or al-Qaida leaders? Did they really have SA-7s?
(cont'd)