PDA

View Full Version : These are good times for terrorists


Ret10Echo
08-27-2009, 19:04
Interesting take from todays Washington Examiner.....:munchin


Meghan Cox Gurdon: These are good times for terrorists
By: Meghan Cox Gurdon
Examiner Columnist
August 27, 2009

How gratifying recent events must appear when seen through enemy eyes.

Scotland has released the only man ever convicted in the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jumbo jet, flaming pieces of which fell into the village of Lockerbie. After only eight years in prison, Libyan secret service agent Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was flown back to a triumphant reception in Tripoli.

al-Megrahi is mortally sick, of course; the not-exactly-ironclad case against him was up for appeal, of course; Britain wants Libyan oil, of course. Still: Terrorists took down a jet filled mostly with Americans, and two decades later the putatively guilty party has got away Scot-free.

Meanwhile, in Afghanistan, the harder the Taliban fights, the more Americans lose interest in beating it. The Taliban gave succor and shelter to Osama bin Laden in the months leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks.

Afghan militants are killing American troops in record numbers, cutting off the fingers of villagers who dared to vote in national elections, successfully detonating huge truck bombs in Afghan cities. And eight years on, 51 percent of Americans say the war in Afghanistan is "not worth fighting."

Now the Great Satan, choking on debt and mired in recession, is turning on its own. Incredibly, the American government is reopening criminal investigations of CIA officers who, after the Sept. 11 attacks, persuaded captured Al Qaeda operatives to tell what they knew about further planned attacks on the United States.

Islamists can videotape themselves sawing through the necks of helpless American captives. They can drag the charred bodies of Americans through the streets of Mogadishu and Fallujah. They can plan and execute truck bombings and ambushes of American troops and international aid organizations.

And militants now know that, should they be apprehended, American interrogators cannot so much as wave a loaded gun or blow cigar smoke in their faces lest they face the disciplinary wrath of their own authorities. (It is true that American drones are managing on occasion to liquefy Islamists from above, but at least the United States isn't getting any intelligence out of them.)

Al Qaeda and its fellow travelers must find this wonderfully encouraging. Here is President Barack Obama, acting through his Attorney General Eric Holder and egged on by the American Civil Liberties Union, doing the hard work for them of demoralizing and undermining American intelligence operatives.

"Our government authorized the use of torture," Holder said in a speech to the American Constitution Society in June 2008. "We owe the American people a reckoning."

Actually, what the executive branch owes the American people above all is the preservation, protection and defense of the Constitution; that is why every incoming president swears to fulfill these duties upon taking office.
The Republic rests on the Constitution, but the reverse is also true; the Constitution and all the benign and enlightened principles it embodies rest on the continued strength and moral will of the Republic.

If that moral will is undermined by hauling interrogators into court for making suspected terrorists feel a little uncomfortable -- which is all that a waved gun or blown cigar smoke amount to -- then America's current leaders are not taking their nation's future seriously.

Terrorist sponsors, like the militants themselves, must be enjoying the spectacle. Teheran's mullahs, having suppressed that inconvenient recent expression of Iranian democracy, have named an alleged terrorist -- a man wanted by Interpol for a bloody 1994 bombing in Buenos Aires -- to be the country's new defense minister.

You can hear their mockery from thousands of miles away.

Examiner Columnist Meghan Cox Gurdon is a former foreign correspondent and a regular contributor to the books pages of The Wall Street Journal. Her Examiner column appears on Thursday.

nmap
08-27-2009, 19:12
As I read the foregoing, I reflect on a statement by Rahm Emanuel - "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."

Here's the 8 second video: LINK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yeA_kHHLow&feature=player_embedded)

Does it explain the facts as they are today? I'll leave that to others to decide as they will.

afchic
08-28-2009, 09:35
I heard an interesting comment on the news this morning from Representative King (Ranking memebr of the House Homeland Security Committee)

Democrats were up in arms about the Patriot Act and how it was abusing the civil liberties of American Citizens. How dare the Federal Government gather data on American Citizens. George Bush is throwing the Constitution right out the window, and we aren't going to stand for it, because we are Democrats and we hold the Bill of Rights as a cherished document and intend to save the American people from the villiany of this President.

Fast forward 8 years. The same democrats against many of the clauses of the Patriot Act, that may help to keep the nation and its citizens safe, are now trying to pass a health care bill that will allow the IRS to pass on data to Federal Government Health Care board that will assess whether a person has the right to help from the government for health care.

So now they will have access to all of my checking and savings account information, my tax information, the number of dependants in my household, whether I pay my bills on time, etc etc.

So keeping the nation safe from a further attack is not good enough reason to gather certain data on American Citizens, but to move forward Government run health care, it is.

If the American people can not see the hypocracy, or the irony in the actions of our elected leaders, we deserve what we get.

nmap
08-28-2009, 10:29
are now trying to pass a health care bill that will allow the IRS to pass on data to Federal Government Health Care board that will assess whether a person has the right to help from the government for health care.

Good point. In addition, it contains language that prohibits the IRS from waiving penalties. So - a taxpayer makes an innocent mistake. The IRS wishes to waive the penalty. That will now be prohibited.

Nice? NOT!

The Reaper
08-28-2009, 11:24
Good point. In addition, it contains language that prohibits the IRS from waiving penalties. So - a taxpayer makes an innocent mistake. The IRS wishes to waive the penalty. That will now be prohibited.

Nice? NOT!

Well, unless you are a prominent Dim who wants a political appointment.

Taxes are for the little people, don't you know?:rolleyes:

TR