PDA

View Full Version : Is Yemen Chewing Itself to Death?


Richard
08-25-2009, 06:05
FWIW - it isn't just Yemen in that part of the world.

And so it goes...;)

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Is Yemen Chewing Itself to Death?
Andrew Butters, Time, 25 Aug 2009

By 4 in the afternoon, most men walking the streets of Sana'a are high, or about to get high — not on any sort of manufactured narcotics, but on khat, a shrub whose young leaves contain a compound with effects similar to those of amphetamines. Khat is popular in many countries of the Arabian peninsula and the Horn of Africa, but in Yemen it's a full-blown national addiction. As much as 90% of men and 1 in 4 women in Yemen are estimated to chew the leaves, storing a wad in one cheek as the khat slowly breaks down into the saliva and enters the bloodstream. The newcomer to Yemen's ancient capital can't miss the spectacle of almost an entire adult population presenting cheeks bulging with cud, leaving behind green confetti of discarded leaves and branches.

For its many devotees, khat is a social lubricant on a par with coffee or alcohol in the West. Indeed, because chewing the leaf isn't forbidden by Islam, "khat is alcohol for Muslims," says Yahya Amma, the head merchant at the Agriculture Suq, one of the largest khat markets in the city. "You can chew it and still go to prayers." The leaf's energy-boosting and hunger-numbing properties help university students focus on their homework, allows underpaid laborers to work without meals and, according to local lore, offers the same help to impotent men that Westerners seek in Viagra. Evening khat ceremonies — regular salon gatherings (usually only of men) to chew and chat about matters great and small — are the country's basic form of socializing.

But khat's detractors say the leaf is destroying Yemen. At around $5 for a bag (the amount typically consumed by a single regular user in a day) it's an expensive habit in a country where about 45% of the population lives below the poverty line. (Most families spend more money on khat than on food, according to government figures.) A khat-addled public is more inclined to complacency about the failings of the government, khat ceremonies reinforce the exclusion of women from power and, as is obvious to anyone finding a government office nearly empty on a weekday morning, khat is keeping the country awake well past its bedtime.

"You sit up discussing all your problems and think you've solved everything, but in fact you haven't done anything in the last four hours, because you've just been chewing khat and all your problems actually got worse," says Adel al-Shujaa, a professor of political science at Sana'a University and the head of the Yemen Without Khat Association. Plus, he says, "all the decisions you've made are bad because you've made them while on khat."

But the worst thing about khat may be that it is sucking Yemen dry.

The plant thrives in the high hill country outside Sana'a, where nearly every patch of irrigated land is covered in khat. Unlike coffee, which Yemenis claim was first cultivated here, khat is easy to grow and harvest. And though cultivating and dealing the leaf doesn't generate the kind of instant wealth associated with growing poppies in Afghanistan or coca in Colombia, it certainly provides a steadier income than growing vegetables does — that's why nearly all of the country's arable land is devoted to khat. And khat needs a lot of water, which is scarce in Yemen.

Khat fields are typically flooded twice a month, consuming about 30% of the country's water — most of which is pumped from underground aquifers filled thousands of years ago, and replenished only very slowly by the occasional rainfall that seeps through the layers of soil and rock. A recent explosion of khat cultivation has drawn water levels down to the point where they are no longer being replenished. The option of pumping desalinated water over long pipelines from coastal plants is too expensive for such a poor country. Yemen is in real danger of becoming the world's first country to run out of water.

"I tell UNHCR that they should start buying tents [for the communities that would be forced to move in search of drinking water]," says Michael Klingler, a hydrologist and the local director of GTZ, the German government's technical-assistance team, which is advising Yemen on water-management issues.

A massive drought — accelerated by khat cultivation — and the resultant population displacement could have a devastating impact in one of the most fragile countries in the Middle East. A separatist insurgency in the south is threatening to break the country apart, while pirates from Somalia are menacing the coast. Al-Qaeda, meanwhile, has long seen the lawless tribal lands in the northern mountains as a potential sanctuary.

Quitting khat would double the amount of household water available, says Klingler, but that may only slow the onset of crisis. The hydrologist argues that Yemen needs to revert to consuming only as much water as it collects from rains — and to import most of its food from abroad.

Despite the danger, Yemen isn't about to go cold turkey anytime soon. Not only are most of the country's leaders landowners deeply involved in khat production, the leaf may be one of the few things still holding Yemen together. Says Ashraf Al-Eryani, one of GTZ's local program officers, "Khat plays a big role in keeping people calm, and keeping them off the streets. But it's also delaying change. It's hard to convince people to act now."

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1917685,00.html

nmap
08-25-2009, 08:23
Quitting khat would double the amount of household water available, says Klingler, but that may only slow the onset of crisis. The hydrologist argues that Yemen needs to revert to consuming only as much water as it collects from rains — and to import most of its food from abroad.


Interesting article!

There are those who contend that water will be the next big shortage - and every bit as destabilizing as an oil shortage.

Also, I cannot help wondering if khat might be useful in terms of keeping the population in such areas sufficiently medicated that they don't create more problems.

Richard
08-25-2009, 08:35
Also, I cannot help wondering if khat might be useful in terms of keeping the population in such areas sufficiently medicated that they don't create more problems.

Hasn't worked much for Somalia and Sudan. ;)

Richard's $.02 :munchin

SF_BHT
08-25-2009, 08:40
Hell let them keep self medicating. Makes it easier to hit. Like shooting tgt's in the arcade. The wobble and you lead.

nmap
08-25-2009, 08:53
Hasn't worked much for Somalia and Sudan. ;)

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Well...both of those areas seem like good candidates for dystopias - or, perhaps, simply Hells on Earth. However, my perception is that much of the trouble created by them is directed at others within their own areas. The Somalian pirate issue is a notable exception; however, even that seems localized.

If they ceased using khat, I suppose its possible that they could uplift their societies - and yet, it also seems possible that they would simply create more (and more capable) enemies in the war on terror.

As a thought experiment, would the Taliban be more effective as they are, or hooked on khat? It seems at least possible that stoned Taliban (pun intended) would be the more desirable option.

And, of course, I freely admit that my ignorance in this area is wide and deep. So if I've said dumb things, I welcome correction.

Richard
08-25-2009, 09:15
Here's something to 'chew' on...;)

Khat & The Realities of Somalis: Historic, Social, Household, Political & Economic

http://www.geocities.com/mbali/doc172.htm

Richard's $.02 :munchin

afchic
08-25-2009, 11:38
Richard, great article. When my husband went into Djibouti in 2002 to open up the military side of the airfield, he had a rule that all operations stopped on the airfield from like 1400-1800 every day. The reason being, that is the time the daily flight came in from Somalia with khat. He was not happy about having a bunch of people jacked up on khat driving around his airfield, potentially doing damage to everything in their path.

For those that think khat is no worse than alcohol etc, maybe they should do some reserach into real life scenarios such as "Black Hawk Down". It is my understanding that alot of the somalis involved were jacked up on khat.

Additionally, when you talk about Africa and its use of child soldiers, khat is one of the ways they can get the kids to do the things they do.

I think I read an article not too long ago that was talking about trying to get khat legalized here in the US. I'll see if I can find it.

version13
08-25-2009, 12:51
Great article and good to see this problem come to light.

I've spent about a year living in Yemen while studying the language and culture. In fact, I even wrote a college paper or two on the current political crises and how that relates to usage of qat and the water shortage.

In my research (I can pull sources), I've actually found that the problem is greater than the article says it to be.

Most families spend more money on khat than on food, according to government figures.


Current figures say one third to half their income.

Khat fields are typically flooded twice a month, consuming about 30% of the country's water


Some researchers actually put this figure as high as 60%. There is a movement to use the historical method of irrigation for qat using only rain water and canals that could still support the current fields, but the ease of using ground water outweighs this.

The only critique on the article is this:

it's an expensive habit in a country where about 45% of the population lives below the poverty line.


What poverty line are they using and to what standard? This is a very relative term as those who are below the poverty line in India live in slums and those in Yemen live with families and are relatively healthier, have family support, etc.

The biggest problem of qat in Yemen is that many of the fields are controlled by rebel troops. particularly the Al-Houthi rebels of the region of Sa'ada. This is a very violent bunch who took up arms against the Jews of the region as mentioned in an earlier post on this forum. Qat production, being the nations cash-crop, funds terrorism in Yemen and abroad.

nmap
08-25-2009, 14:27
Khat & The Realities of Somalis: Historic, Social, Household, Political & Economic


Thank you for the article.

Version13: The article indicates the following:

Somaliland figures are starkly illustrative. The absolute poverty line budget for a household ' is of the order of $1,250 a year. The cost of consuming khat habitually (say 300 days a year) is $1,500 a year. The average household income is of the order of perhaps $1,500 excluding and $2,500 including remittances. $1, 250 is less than $1,500 and $2,750 is in excess of $2,500 even abstracting from the fact that over 50 per cent of households have less than $1,000 earned and $1,500 total (including remittances) income.


I sense, perhaps, the philosophical fork in the road.

According to my (very limited) understanding, SOF-CA practice tends toward improving the lives of the target population. This might include improvements to infrastructure (e.g., building schools, digging wells, improving roads), and generally facilitating (encouraging?) a transition to a better, more affluent, and generally happier life.

Assuming that's somewhat valid, I can see both good and bad sides to that coin. The good side is that it may well win hearts and minds if applied over a sufficient time. It would also tend to put the U.S. in a relatively positive light. It could contribute, eventually, to increased commerce with the U.S., so the process could develop both customers and sources of supply for U.S. companies.

And, as Version13 mentions, and the article affirms, rebel troops control the fields and hence gain a revenue stream.

So there are, clearly, good reasons to oppose the expansion of Khat.

There may be another side to the COIN, however.

Let us suppose, for the sake of discussion, that our resources and time do not permit us to build up a region. Might it be worthwhile to deny resources - human, monetary, and otherwise - to the other side? While it is true that the rebel forces gain revenue, the stream of revenue seems relatively small. And, as the article suggests:

Ironically international agencies - global, multilateral, bilateral and NGO - have become agents for laundering/converting Khat proceeds. They need Somali shillings to meet local expenses. It is convenient to draw these from local merchants paying up at the end of the month in Nairobi in USA $ with a commission for the exchange services and interest on drawings. The transactions at this level are perfectly normal and neither illegal nor unethical. The difficulty is that the Somali shillings paid are in large part the proceeds of Khat sales which need to be converted into hard currency available in Kenya to meet leaf purchase, transport and 'facilitation' ('mafuta') costs. An uncharitable observer could well describe the agency contracts as khat money launderettes.

So the actions of various agencies are an element of the problem. Eliminating funding for the rebels seems like a multi-element problem, and merely removing khat would not suffice.

What does khat do?

The basic cases against Khat are socio-economic, household welfare/interpersonal relations and macro-economic. In the Somali homelands it is the largest single consumption item (for many households every category that is, exceeding food). It literally eats up the money to feed children, wears out the resources to cloth them and their mothers and chews up ability to finance health care.

In essence, it disrupts and impoverishes the society. From a short-term perspective, then, it reduces the value of an area. While not as good as the combination of improving the value of the area plus winning their friendship, it is better than letting the other side benefit. Thus, in some instances at least, encouraging the use of khat might advance U.S. interests - perhaps?

At this point I would ask what I was missing, except someone would surely reply that it was a moral compass. :D

Dozer523
08-25-2009, 15:13
I cannot help wondering if khat might be useful in terms of keeping the population in such areas sufficiently medicated that they don't create more problems. We're not supposed to think like that in America! :D

Richard
08-25-2009, 15:56
At this point I would ask what I was missing, except someone would surely reply that it was a moral compass.

All the other variables - societal, economic, political, regional - that come into play with this and any issue this complicated - none of which can seldom be treated in isolation. Our efforts regarding coca in Peru would probably offer a good study for comparative thinking.

Richard's $.02 :munchin

nmap
08-25-2009, 20:23
All the other variables - societal, economic, political, regional - that come into play with this and any issue this complicated - none of which can seldom be treated in isolation. Our efforts regarding coca in Peru would probably offer a good study for comparative thinking.

Richard's $.02 :munchin

I recall...perhaps more than a year ago?...a discussion about Iraq. Jatx had done some statistical modeling, and said much the same thing mentioned above. I believe you, just as I believed him.

But if these issues are as complex as they seem to be, do neophytes like me have any real hope of developing a solid understanding of the issues? Or is it something where only well informed specialists can grasp the problem?

You mention Peru, along with a variety of variables. I can easily see months worth of effort in developing a cursory understanding of the issues mentioned. And months more to do likewise with Somalia. Then contrasting and comparing the two would be, at best, a non-trivial effort.

I'm almost inclined to say "Yikes!" :eek:

Richard
08-25-2009, 20:28
I'm almost inclined to say "Yikes!" :eek:

Now you're talking - so let's get started. :)

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Peru Sees Cocaine Making A Comeback
LA Times, 23 Mar 2008

<snip>

Peru's cocaine industry, the world's largest and most violent in the late 1980s and early 1990s, is again on the upswing. Plots of coca bushes, whose leaves yield cocaine, have increased by about one-third since 1999, to about 127,000 acres, according to Peruvian and United Nations estimates.

<snip>

Peru, the world's No. 2 supplier, feeds a booming demand in Brazil, Europe, East Asia and as far away as Australia, authorities say. The density of coca plantings has doubled in some cases, experts say, and the fertilizer-nourished leaf now yields a greater proportion of cocaine alkaloid, the active ingredient in cocaine.

(cont'd) http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/23/world/fg-coca23

Irishsquid
08-25-2009, 20:37
What you said...

Actually, the q'at plane into Djibouti/Ambouli international comes from Ethiopia, or so we were told when I was there. We found out quickly that from 1500-1800 at least, don't go ANYWHERE. Every driver on the road was high on q'at at the time. Pretty much everywhere in HOA, (Yemen is considered HOA AOR, or was when I was there.) q'at is used to keep the locals "happy."

As long as they can get q'at, they stay civil. Sudan and Somalia are very notable exceptions. It is, however, widely used throughout the AOR, and tends to keep the residents happy-ish, at least for the moment. It's really just a temporary fix, though, like plugging a ruptured pipe with chewing gum and saying you fixed it.

To be clear, I'm not saying the self-medication of whole societies works...just that, from the perspective of an unstable, crooked government, it works well enough.

--Irishsquid OUT