PDA

View Full Version : SatComms For Soldiers


Warrior-Mentor
07-27-2009, 09:49
Michael Yon: Online Magazine
www.michaelyon-online.com
July 25, 2009

SatComms For Soldiers
By Michael Yon

Sangin, Afghanistan--Have been out with British forces in the area of Sangin in northern Helmand Province. This area appears to be turning into the main effort of the current fight in Afghanistan, but this is unclear to me at the moment. I do know that air assets are heavy. During our mission yesterday, a B-1 could be seen overhead, though it was miles high.

On the ground, this place is loaded with IEDs and there were many firefights during yesterday’s mission. My section of eight soldiers did not fire a single round; we did not come into direct contact, though bullets sometimes zipped overhead. Nearly all missions are conducted on foot and the soldiers like it that way.

I am with the British battalion called 2 Rifles. The last mission I did with 2 Rifles was in Iraq, and they killed maybe 26-27 JAM members during that fight. Yesterday they only killed two Taliban (Predator actually made the shot), but the mission was well run, and morale here is very high. Everybody is ready to roll again and missions are near continuous. I’ll ask British commanders to let me stay, though that might not be necessary because there are so few helicopters. More likely I am stuck here. FOB Jackson is probably going to be my Hotel California, but that’s all good because these are great soldiers, in the thick of it, and I want to stay.

More broadly speaking, our forces are spread to the high winds across desolate stretches of Afghanistan, sometimes in tiny “bases” with as few as a half-dozen soldiers. Last December, I spent some time with a group of such soldiers in Zabul Province, but hardly wrote a word about them, yet. They were deep in wild country and it took two days for us to drive out to a paved road. Those soldiers had no access to Internet, and said that on one occasion they didn’t even get mail for three months.

Until December, I used a satellite antenna called a “Regional BGAN” (R-BGAN) HNS-9101 to transmit dispatches from remote areas. These small, portable systems are expensive; during a fifteen-day period last year, I spent almost exactly $5,000. (Prices based on bandwidth usage.)

During late 2008, when I saw the group of a half-dozen American soldiers, out there in the boondocks, two days from a road and once going three months without mail, I told Mrs. Frankie Mayo, who runs Operation AC. Frankie and Operation AC had sent loads of gear to Iraq, including air conditioners and generators. When I told Frankie about the isolated soldiers, she got to work with Hughes to send R-BGANs to Afghanistan.

Lucky for me, with the old R-BGAN no longer usable, Hughes, through Frankie, shipped a newer model, the Hughes 9201 BGAN Inmarsat Terminal. Many of this year’s dispatches will come through the 9201.

Without such a terminal, large numbers of Soldiers, Marines, Airmen and Sailors will be without regular communications for much or most of their time in Afghanistan. The infrastructure is Spartan to non-existent. Life here is tougher than it was in Iraq, and the fighting will be tougher still. Yes, there are the gigantic bases—as in Iraq—where everything is available, but little of the war is being fought from the larger bases.

Extended battlefield journalism from Afghanistan is relatively non-existent. Broadly speaking, folks at home will not know how their loved ones are doing unless they can communicate directly. To learn more about the effort to send satellite communications gear to troops downrange, please see Operation AC.

RedGun
07-27-2009, 10:30
This strikes a nerve here. I’ve been doing Sat-Com in the Army for the past 7 years at tactical and stategic levels including 3 12 month deployments in SWA. Often I see Sat-Com terminals sitting in the Signal motor pools of these large FOBs in Iraq and Kuwait without a mission. Many others are providing comms but only as hyper-redundant links. Others are just there in the large FOBs to provide faster access to Google and Facebook to many who already have multiple ways of accessing the Global Information Grid.

This is disturbing to me because I know that there are many soldiers doing the dirty work out there in these small Fire Bases (especially in Afghanastan) with little to no access to NIPR and DSN services. To me it seems that the ARMY has the resources but they are not always used wisely. I know that planning can be complicated and there are logistical issues and so forth. But what do we tell these soldiers? Perhaps the Signal Corps needs to step out of its comfort zone a little and start getting troops like me outside “the wire” more often to these smaller Fire Bases.

No more NETCOM units for me (at least for awhile). I’m reporting to 7th Group in November. CAN’T WAIT!!!

Ret10Echo
07-27-2009, 10:48
Several agencies are currently utilizing the Thrane 700 series terminals....the big dollar signs are based upon the system integration (there are a ton of companies doing that) as well as the service bandwidth package.

It is still not foolproof with siting and look-angles that are normally associated with satcom systems.

Bechorg
07-30-2009, 04:17
I am at one such place that happens to have a signal unit and comms is OK. Still in the boonies. DOD still took it upon themselves to disable facebook and the like, but that is probably a good thing. All you really need is email. BGANS are in use and are very nice to have minus the high price tag that the unit usually has to bear.

Most of the COPS/OPS of course they dont have connectivity, nor should they besides an iridium. Focus in a place like that is completely different than focus on a larger outpost...just my thoughts.

Cant make everyone happy. :boohoo

RedGun
07-31-2009, 09:54
"Most of the COPS/OPS of course they dont have connectivity, nor should they besides an iridium. Focus in a place like that is completely different than focus on a larger outpost...just my thoughts."


....Interesting point. I never considered that. I suppose there is also a big bandwidth issue on the satellites as well. Let's face it, there aren't a lot of good satellite footprints over Afghanistan. Besides, if you're in the the mountains that could cause some real problems for the look angle of your dish.

Ret10Echo
07-31-2009, 12:57
Interestng how the expectation of connectivity and information flow has changed. That "cloud" in the diagram apparently doesn't reach everywhere.

SATCOMBEAST
11-14-2009, 04:00
Redgun i definitely agree with you about getting good services out to the Soldiers, email and DSN at the very least. Bandwidth is not the issue anymore with the new WGS birds. The problem as I see it is the MTOE associated with SATCOM terminals, and there being designated as BN or higher comms. The Army needs a CPN-like system that could be designated at the company level.

ApexShot
05-10-2010, 16:37
At the very least, get some SPOPs out to some of these COPs & OPs. I can see there could be difficulty getting CPNs to some of the OPs I've seen, but SPOPs are small, & can be run by 2 soldiers easily. Most of the soldiers in the signal unit I'm deployed with currently are doing jack shit, sitting at Bagram & getting in trouble. Some way to spend a deployment.:mad: I would gladly volunteer for a mission to set up NIPRnet or DSN services on an OP if I was stuck at BAF like most of my peers, but then again, its all up to the higher ups. :rolleyes:

CommoNCO
05-10-2010, 17:43
I've spent my time so far in tactical SATCOM - and I'll tell you that no matter what we try, the powers that be won't send us out to a lot of the remote locations, and that's a really sad thing. I see the same terminals that you do, being used for NIPR for people that spend too much time on facebook than they do the battlefield. That's one of the main reasons that I'm training up in the hopes of getting into an 18-series MOS than the 25-Series - because being stuck in a place where the focus is NOT on the shooters is not a good place to be.

Draco771
08-04-2010, 12:17
If I may ask, would you HAVE TO have a SATCOM terminal? Or would it be possible to modify say, a lap top to connect to a satellite network?

Home computers do it all the time. (Satellite Internet) some providers only give you a 5'' in diameter satellite dish, you plug it into a spot that looks into the Eastern sky, and vwolla, internet.

Would it be possible to do the same for a military computer for Soldiers leisure?

If the issue is that 25Ss aren't allowed to leave the wire, and go to remote locations. (as a Bn asset, I can imagine why...) Would it be possible to take in a 25U (they are assigned at Company, even Platoon Level at times) train him/her in how to operate Satellite Networks (to an extent needed to perform the function you're trying to do) and establish such connections/route the internet throughout the COP/OP? Like find out a 25U who's going to be heading out soon, and go "Hey man, I want to show you some stuff before you leave" kind of thing?

Network Administration I've been hearing is a strong part of the 25U MOS. If it's possible to do the above, it shouldn't be too hard for a 25U to pick up the information. But then, I have no idea how involved 25Ss are with other Signal MOSs.

A neighbor of mine has Satellite internet set up for his home. He's a 7'' dish that aims to the Eastern sky, he installed it all himself. Just cut a hole into his roof, push the fiber optic cable through, seal it with a type of foam (so his roof doesn't leak) route it into his house to a centralized modem (he bought it at Best Buy, perhaps it'd be possible for Soldiers overseas to order such modems, and take them with them? or perhaps have them shipped overseas?) from the modem he routes fiber optic cables into "hubs" he has outlined across his house until you get to the upstairs living room computer. from there, he routes a wireless router to get his other room.

To ensure an exceptionally strong signal, he simply installed a wireless adapter next to his fire alarm on the ceiling. with takes in the wireless signal and amplifies it to the comp in his room, and his two laptops.

Would the same principals be able to be applied in say, Iraq/A-Stan?

TF Kilo
08-14-2010, 01:13
It's a double edged sword. Being able to get commo that is REQUIRED to be able to accomplish the mission is great.

I give 2 shits about internet though. It was nice, but keeping combat focus through NOT having commo other than 10 minutes on an iridium satphone every two weeks...

The internet was more of a problem than a solution when I was at locations that had it. I was a lowly specialist in Ranger Regiment, but I was there to conduct war, not to get my status update on...

The only status update I was concerned about was ACE.