View Full Version : Crisis Fatigue
Something to consider. ;)
Richard's $.02 :munchin
Crisis Fatigue
Kathleen Parker, TH, 1 Apr 2009
What if everybody just took a timeout?
Now there's a concept for a TMI-addled nation. It isn't only Too Much Information, but the pitch and tenor of delivery that have us in a persistent state of psychic frenzy. From cable news to microblogs to the latest -- "Fox Nation" -- life's background music has become one prolonged car alarm.
The market's up! The Dow plunges! Obama fired the GM CEO! Greta's husband helped Palin!! OMG, Obama's taking 500 people to Europe and Merkel doesn't like his new deal and they're taking our assault weapons and we're all going to be communists!!
But first, if your erection lasts more than four hours, contact your physician immediately.
The phrase "too much information," a now-cliched talk-to-the-hand deflection, isn't just a gentle whack at someone who tells you more than you want to know about his Cialis experience. It's a toxic asset that exhausts our cognitive resources while making the nonsensical seem significant.
TMI may indeed be the despot's friend. Keep citizens so overwhelmed with data that they can't tell what's important and eventually become incapable of responding to what is. Our brains simply aren't wired to receive and process so much information in such a compressed period.
In 2006, the world produced 161 exabytes (an exabyte is 1 quintillion bytes) of digital data, according to Columbia Journalism Review. Put in perspective, that's 3 million times the information contained in all the books ever written. By next year, the number is expected to reach 988 exabytes.
The massive explosion of information has made us all a little batty. Just ask the congressional assistants who field frantic phone calls from constituents.
"Everybody's come unhinged," one told me recently. "They think we're going to hell in a handbasket. And maybe we are."
Who knows?
The unknowingness of current circumstances, combined with a lack of trust in our institutions, may partly be to blame for our apparent info-insatiability. People sense that they need to know more in order to understand an increasingly complex world.
And, of course, it's fun. The urge to know and be known is a uniquely human indulgence. Being connected to friends and colleagues without having to inconvenience one's gluteus maximus surely must stimulate our pleasure center, or else we wouldn't bother.
Yet, with so much data coming from all directions, we risk paralysis. Brain freeze, some call it. More important, we also risk losing our ability to process the Big Ideas that might actually serve us better. It isn't only Jack and Jill who are tethered to the twittering masses, after all. Our thinkers at the highest levels are, too.
Consider: Who didn't want to surrender his BlackBerry?
In fact, brain research shows that we do our best thinking when we're not engaged and focused, yet fewer of us have time for downtime. (If you have to schedule relaxation, is it still relaxing?)
Daydreaming, we used to call it. Ask any creative person where they got their best ideas and they'll say, "Dunno. Just came to me out of the blue." If you're looking for Eureka -- as in the Aha! moment -- you probably won't find it while following David Gregory's tweets. Or checking Facebook to see who might be "friending" whom. Or what George Orwell is ...
More likely, the ideas that save the world will present themselves in the shower or while we're sweeping the front stoop. What the world needs now isn't more, but less. The alternative to mindless activities for the mindful won't be a less-informed nation, but a dumber one.
Unchecked "infomania" -- yes, there's even a term for this instapathology -- can lead to a lower IQ, according to a 2005 Hewlett-Packard study. The research, conducted by a University of London psychologist, found that people distracted by e-mail and phone calls lost 10 IQ points, more than twice the impact of smoking marijuana -- or comparable to losing a night's sleep.
Given that the brain is apparently more receptive when less focused, might our myriad problems stand a better chance of creative solutions were we more unplugged? In the literal sense, that is.
Back in the day, Timothy Leary urged boomers to "turn on, tune in, drop out," which was his snappy way of encouraging the mind-expanding benefits of LSD. (It came to him in the shower, natch.)
A more-apt mantra today might be "turn off, tune out, drop in." Turn off the switch, tune out the noise, drop in on a friend.
Can't hurt. Might help.
Hitting pause now ...
http://townhall.com/columnists/KathleenParker/2009/04/01/crisis_fatigue
Red Flag 1
04-04-2009, 16:38
Great topic!!
Over the past few months, I've limited myself to two hours/day of media input. Even before the "election", I was just saturated to the point of confusion. Pundits, "news", commentary, analysis, and even commercials were just too over the top. My wife would keep the "news" on in the backgroud so she would not miss something. It was not uncommon to see the same "news alert", "breaking news", and"news flash" repaeted for three hours with no real change in the "news". My wife's alternative was HGTV; my alternative was a John Wayne movie....now there's harmony for ya!
The media today is just way too demanding to be taken seriously for 24/7. Even with my home town of Binghamton, NY in the news, a few short minutes on FOX told me all I needed to know. I do take in a bit of ABC, NBC, and CBS to get another view. Local/National/World news via print media offers another view. I am comfortable with a few hours a day considering the "news". If I have my head in the sand, so be it. There are other things that need my attention.
As for side effects from Cialis, get some naked photos of our Sec of State, or Speaker of the House.....it might save you a trip to the ER:D.
Great thread Richard!
RF 1
Surf n Turf
04-04-2009, 16:56
Do I hear an AMEN?
SnT
Sounds like Ms. Parker may be visiting ps.com <<LINK (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showpost.php?p=257391&postcount=36)>>:cool:
But first, if your erection lasts more than four hours, contact your physician immediately.
I don't remember the comedian's name, but he said "Call my doctor? Hell, I'm calling EVERYBODY."
Something to consider. ;)
And I have. To be honest, although my capacity for "stuff" is rather large, I've had to take a step back here and there. Part of me has felt like a "bad" citizen for not being "tuned in" to learn/read/discuss/fret about the latest and in many cases not so greatest...but I'll get over it.
ZonieDiver
04-05-2009, 11:34
And I have. To be honest, although my capacity for "stuff" is rather large, I've had to take a step back here and there. Part of me has felt like a "bad" citizen for not being "tuned in" to learn/read/discuss/fret about the latest and in many cases not so greatest...but I'll get over it.
Last week, on two separate local channel's newscasts (I, too, have cast the evil cable demon from my home. I go watch cable in a bar - the monthly cable bill equals about ten beers at happy hour time!), the local "news" readers used the terms "Global Economic Meltdown" and "Economic Meltdown" within minutes of each other (I was "channel surfing" amonst the four I get.) The near panic in their voices got me thinking (I try to limit that these days).
Amidst this "global economic meltdown" and in a state where the economy is supposedly worse of than many others, I only know - personally - ONE person who has lost a job. That person was my younger daughter in LA, and she had a new job in the same field at a higher rate of pay the next day in San Diego. What I thought was, "Am I the only one?" So, I'd pose the question: How many people do you personally know (not a "friend of a friend" or someone you "heard about") who have lost a job due to the "meltdown"?
Thanks for playing...
I tossed out cable for a few months after the election which did help, but I missed the History, Discovery and Military channels so I went to Dish. My political intake is limited to Radio with Glenn Beck and couple local stations that I listen to going from job to job. Aside from that there are a couple websites I frequent for news and I visit here for what tends to be a more level headed conversation of happenings.
But even with that stimulation which I can turn off ot log off, there is no escaping it. Whether it is a vendor or a customer, one of the first questions they ask is how is business? Are you doing alright? And then I hear about the people they know that lost their jobs, or the ones they have or are going to layoff.
I can't even go to a Scout Pack meeting without hearing about job loss.
I can run, but I can't hide from it.
Thanks for playing...
ZD--
I'll play.:D
In my circle of friends, only one has received a letter that begins with anything like the following.:eek:
Due to the weakened economy and its impact on our workload, as of today, we must end our employment relationship with you.
He's not bitter.;)
I only know one person who was laid off due to the economy. He was out of a job for less than a week before he found a better one.
Sigaba....I'm calling everybody....Very Funny!!!! Even funnier that you posted it.
I think today you have to create your own job if you want controll of your future.
I watch educational and Bloomberg, or the like exculsively. Rarely, if ever, do I tune in to the major news out. The level of sensationlization is overwhelming, but everyone here knows that already. One additional thought: with the closure of all print news within the next 10 years, there will be no reporting on TV., Orwell will have finally arrive at that point.
One additional thought: with the closure of all print news within the next 10 years, there will be no reporting on TV.
I've heard that claim from across the spectrum of futurists for close to three decades now, and I personally remain sceptical of the absoluteness of that prediction - less maybe, but gone. There are many, myself included, who can only take so much of the WWW, radio, and TV, and who prefer to sit and quietly read their newspapers and newsmagazines. I foresee changes, certainly, but not the end of all print news as we know it now...especially if we remain a destination much sought after amongst the world's migrant populations.
Hypothetically - for those who bundle their multi-media access services through their TVs - does this mean watching a newscast through the WWW on a TV screen means they are actually not viewing any reporting on a TV? ;)
And then there is the following piece which I heard on NPRs Morning Edition yesterday morning while driving back from the DFW airport.
Richard's sceptical $.02 :munchin
Ethnic Outlets Survive In Sinking Media Market
Mandalit del Barco, NPR, 7 Apr 2009
Though these are grim times for major news organizations across the country, a few organizations — often labeled "ethnic media" — are thriving.
Many of these newspapers and broadcast stations are doing well because they've tapped into an expanding audience — the sons and daughters of immigrants.
In Los Angeles, the No. 1 TV station isn't NBC, CBS, ABC or Fox — it's Spanish-language KMEX, the flagship of Univision. And it isn't just Los Angeles' top station — Nielsen says it's No. 1 in the U.S. with viewers aged 18-49. KMEX built big numbers with immigrant audiences, but is now drawing their sons and daughters — and even their grandchildren.
University of Southern California journalism professor Felix Gutierrez says it's more than just language that's attracting those younger viewers.
"I was watching last night, and they were talking about the border wars — drug smuggling and all that. But they were covering it from the Mexican side. They had the same kind of footage, but it was a different perspective, a different angle that I don't see on CBS, NBC, CNN and the other networks," Gutierrez says.
Another Los Angeles station, KSCI, offers other options: programs in Korean, Mandarin, Vietnamese and Tagalog.
"We're the largest Asian TV station, serving the largest Asian population in the United States," says KSCI vice president Eric Olander. "People refer to us often as the Asian Univision."
Olander says that while other media companies are laying people off or closing down, his station is actually expanding. KSCI recently launched a new local evening news show in Korean, and a local morning show in Chinese.
The two-hour, live Power Breakfast spotlights local traffic and weather reports, news and quirky features from Los Angeles and Asia. The perky show is anchored by Yiyi Lu and Andy Chang, who both grew up in Los Angeles watching Chinese TV with their parents, and American shows like Friends and The Simpsons.
"The key thing for the show is energy," Olander says. "That's why we call it Power Breakfast. It's a culture shock in terms of news — we are trying to jump out of the ordinary Chinese TV news."
Olander says stations like his used to rely on ethnic audiences that had few other options because they weren't comfortable in English. But that's not necessarily true of immigrants' children.
"We know that the first generation watches us," he says. "The second generation's much more difficult to capture, in part because they have language skills, which allow them to watch MTV, to go listen to NPR. They have a much wider array of choices. Not to mention, the second generation, which are younger, is watching less TV — they're on the Web, they're not reading the newspapers in the numbers they were. Their media patterns are changing."
That's why in addition to its broadcasts, KSCI now offers podcasts, blogs and video online in various Asian languages and in English.
Dynamic, Multigenerational Consumption
The biggest Spanish language daily newspaper in the country, La Opinion, is also reaching out online. The Los Angeles paper's circulation has dipped, but it still has half a million readers.
Publisher Monica Lozano says the newspaper, which was started in 1926 by her grandfather, survived the Great Depression, battles over immigration and world wars, and it's now adapting to the recession and new media appetites. Lozano says Latino households tend to be multigenerational, multilingual and multimedia.
"So the beautiful thing is that the parents reading the newspaper, they're talking to kids who are online; the kids are talking to their parents about something they've just learned; grandparents are saying, 'But I just [saw] this on television'," Lozano says. "So the media consumption is actually very dynamic, very multigenerational. It goes across language."
Increasingly, that language is Spanglish.
Latino 96.3 FM is operated by the Spanish Broadcasting System, which owns radio stations across the country. DJs at the popular station spin a musical mix, from rancheras to reggaeton to hip-hop. On the air each morning, Chuey Martinez easily switches between Spanish and English.
"I would like to think I'm talking the way everybody else is talking. Porque hablamos ingles aqui en Los Angeles y espanol tambien. We speak both, especially if you grew up here in L.A., you grew up speaking both," Martinez says.
Martinez's father emigrated from the Dominican Republic, and his mother is Mexican-American. Like other 27-year-olds, he grew up watching telenovelas with his family and now interfaces bilingually.
"Young Latinos are very tech savvy," he says. "We like iPhones, we like the iPods, the MySpaces, Facebooks. I Twitter like you have no idea right now. I blog. I vlog [video blog] a lot. Wow, I consume it all, man." And Martinez says the media increasingly reflects that new multicultural reality. He says his million and a half weekly listeners can't be wrong.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102802880
unfortunalty I am so narrow minded that after Rahm Emanuals comments on TV about "never letting a good crisis go to waste" that it would likely take having my house float away before I'll pay much attention to an administration or media hyped "crisis". My default setting is now "whatever" the instant I hear about a new "crisis"
...just like the day The Honorable Mrs Pelosi reminded us that we were loosing 500,000 jobs a day.
blah blah blah... My ears are so clogged full of bullshit I can barely understand whats being said while I watch reruns of "the Simpsons" instead of the news.
[QUOTE=Billy L-bach;258504]...just like the day The Honorable Mrs Pelosi reminded us that we were losing 500,000 jobs a day.QUOTE]
Actually, that number would have been more palatable than her actual quote - a classic case of open mouth - insert feet - gnaw publicly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8hMJVXt09E
And especially since the current population of the entire country is just over 300, 000, 000. ;)
Richard's $.02 :munchin
One additional thought: with the closure of all print news within the next 10 years...
Here's an interesting aspect of the argument ot consider - it's just a prototype but one of the first decent attempts to move the newspaper online...and it’s worth a look if you are even vaguely an info junkie.
http://prototype.nytimes.com/gst/articleSkimmer/
Richard's $.02 :munchin
500 million... my bad
I was off by three zeros but whats three zeros these days... 500,000 or 500,000,000 whatever its just a number.
trillion million zillion jillion bazillion....
I like the title of that clip... "dumber than soap"
...and now I am seeing talk of taxing soda because its a health care issue because of the obesity epidemic.
...this sandwich tastes like shit !
I've heard that claim from across the spectrum of futurists for close to three decades now, and I personally remain skeptical of the absoluteness of that prediction - less maybe, but gone. There are many, myself included, who can only take so much of the WWW, radio, and TV, and who prefer to sit and quietly read their newspapers and newsmagazines. I foresee changes, certainly, but not the end of all print news as we know it now...especially if we remain a destination much sought after amongst the world's migrant populations.
Hypothetically - for those who bundle their multi-media access services through their TVs - does this mean watching a newscast through the WWW on a TV screen means they are actually not viewing any reporting on a TV? ;)
I spent the first half of this decade working for the R&D lab for P****** Electronics. From that experience in the salt mines, I learned that the consumer electronics (CE) and the 'business solutions' (BSD) electronics industry are furiously working to find the golden chalice: digital convergence (DC). (In other circles, the chalice goes by different names: netcentric warfare, the strategic corporal, the post-partisan politician are three variants.)
I am of the growing conviction that when it comes time to write the history of this god awful economic crisis, the unintended consequences of the quest for digital convergence will be a primary cause.
In CE/BSD the quest proceeds along four intertwined paths. Those paths are:
The network and the servers in the 'head end' tying the pieces together [Want to make a small fortune? Design, build, market, and sell a component in this network that is indispensable but does nothing. The support, licensing, upgrade, and training fees alone will keep you flush for years.]
The platform (hardware). The race is on to determine if form of DC will be a 'lean forward'--closer to a computer--or lean back experience--closer to something with a remote control:
a computer,
a cable set-top box,
a console (that the Playstation can be used for gaming is the tip of the iceberg).
a media receiver attached to a plasma,
the plasma itself,
a personal media device,
a cell phone,
or will it be something else ;).
(My two cents are that as OLED technology matures and when nanotechnology fulfills its promise, the solution is going to look like a piece of clothing. I should start saving now for what the guys at TAD Gear may come up with.)
The 'software' (SkyNet, anyone?)
the user interface (UI),
the format of the content,
the AI driving the programs,
the plug-in applications,
the database
the languages used to write the applications (Java is the front runner for reasons that leave developers and software engineers in alternating states of disgust, despair, disbelief, and drollness.)
the encryption.
The content and the business model for its production and distribution. As the ongoing labor dispute between the actors' unions and the film and television producers illustrates, there is as of yet no sustainable business model for 'new media.' 'New media' is an anachronistic, imprecise term returning to everyday use thanks to the MSM. Other catch words and phrases of interest (read: grave concern).
compression
format
on demand (not to be confused for pay per view)
a la cart
bundle
tier
The quest for DC is mired in discourse that is increasingly fetishsized (Bjarne Stroustrup is a terrible writer:confused:). While much of this discussion must remain...non disclosed...one can see the public side of the conversation.
When one hears the buzz among fanboys, bloggers, traditional journalists trying (vainly) to keep up, and new media journalists trying to carve out a niche centers, it is about the 'wow' factor of the latest iteration of the Holy Grail, its features, its bugs, its patches, its skins, its upgrades, and its hacks.
This focus on the 'wow' factor is changing everyday life. Not so long ago, people would notice what paper you were reading on the train or bus. If a person seemed to have a good head on his shoulders, observers might strike up a conversation that started "Hey, what are you reading?" Now, the conversation is "Hey, is that the new Blackberry?"
We are forgetting that the truest test of a tool is the performance of what that tool is used to build.
I know a guy here in Dallas who has trouble associating with humans but has $$$$$ and owns over a dozen Ferraris - some of which he races - because he developed a couple of software programs which allow a variety of specialized government software programs to interface across a number of different agencies. He flies his own private jet, has several estates, is constantly wired into the tech world through a number of specialized e-devices he carries with him, and spends as little time as possible around his wife and son.
I would imagine he thinks he's found the Sangreal. I don't think so. ;)
Richard's $.02 :munchin