PDA

View Full Version : McCain, advisers divided over Wright attack


Sigaba
10-15-2008, 11:15
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081015/pl_politico/14587&printer=1;_ylt=ApOK0E.0oquaGMSN_c5ZhPHCw5R4



McCain, advisers divided over Wright attack

Mike AllenWed Oct 15, 9:29 AM ET

John McCain is at odds with many of his top advisers over launching a renewed attack on Barack Obama's ties to his long-time pastor and mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, according to campaign sources.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and several top campaign officials see a sharp attack on Wright as the best — and perhaps last — chance to rattle Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill. ) and force voters to rethink their support of him. But McCain continues to overrule them, fearing a Wright attack would smack of desperation and racism, the officials said.

With McCain unlikely to budge, GOP officials are hoping groups outside of the campaign will finance an ad attack on Obama-Wright ties. It is unclear if any conservative group has the cash to bankroll a serious effort, however.

“Wright is off the table,” said one top campaign official. “It’s all McCain. He won’t go there. His advisers would have gone there.”

The aides argue that the 20 years that Obama spent in the fiery Wright’s pastoral care — and his later assertion that he knew nothing of his former minister’s more extreme statements — provide an opening to challenge Obama’s judgment and honesty in a relevant and politically resonant way.

“He was a central figure in Obama’s life, shaping Obama’s thinking, and he made the extreme radical comments that are borderline anti-American,” the campaign official said.

But McCain will not allow it, according to campaign sources.

“There’s a slippery slope in politics on the racial divide, and Sen. McCain made it very clear early on that he did not want to get into that area,” a top Republican official said. “I don’t want to be known as a racist, and McCain doesn’t want to be known as a racist candidate.”

Among those who think Wright is fair game is McCain’s running mate, Palin, who told conservative commentator William Kristol for a New York Times column last month: “To tell you the truth, Bill, I don’t know why that association isn’t discussed more, because those were appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country, and to have sat in the pews for 20 years and listened to that — with, I don’t know, a sense of condoning it, I guess, because he didn’t get up and leave — to me, that does say something about character. But, you know, I guess that would be a John McCain call on whether he wants to bring that up.”

In his famous speech on race, delivered in Philadelphia in March, Obama condemned Wright’s use of “incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.”

Wright, who married the Obamas and baptized their daughters, has shown no remorse for his videotaped tirades — most famously, “God damn America,” which he said several times in a row. At the National Press Club in April, he said: “I said to Barack Obama last year, ‘If you get elected November the 5th, I'm coming after you, because you'll be representing a government whose policies grind under people.’”

In early June, on the brink of clinching the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama tried to put the controversy behind him by announcing that he and his wife, Michelle, were leaving Wright’s former church, Trinity United Church of Christ, “with some sadness.” Obama said it had become clear statements made at the church “will be imputed to me, even if they conflict with my long-held views, statements and principles.”

The McCain campaign’s decision to cordon off the use of Wright from ads and debates has provoked simmering consternation among many leading Republicans and conservatives, who believe the pastor’s fulminations might be the single most effective weapon McCain has left against Obama.

“McCain felt it would be sensed as racially insensitive,” the official said. “But more important is that McCain thinks that the bringing of racial religious preaching in black churches into the campaign would potentially have grave consequences for civil society in the United States.”

Asked about the issue during the firestorm over it last March, McCain told Sean Hannity on Fox News’ “Hannity & Colmes”: “I think that when people support you, it doesn’t mean that you support everything you say. Obviously, those words and those statements are statements that none of us would associate ourselves with. And I don’t believe that Sen. Obama would support any of those. ... I do know Sen. Obama. He does not share those views.”

Conservatives who want McCain to focus on Wright contend that the omission is another sign of a campaign that is unwilling to play tough enough with the Obama juggernaut.

As the top Republican official said: “There is a future beyond this election.”

Defender968
10-15-2008, 12:54
The reality IMHO is that McCain should have been going at BHO from the get go, as soon as Hillary said uncle McCain should have been screaming from the rooftops about Wright, Ayres, Rezko, etc. If BHO had been white and went to a church that preached an anti American white power theoligy the media, Repubs, and general public would have had him tarred and feathered already. McCain's campaign has been on cruise control stepping very carefully to avoid offending anyone, and I fear that caution may very well cost him and our country dearly.

Why have BHO's socialist links been off limits, most of the BHO supporters I know don't even know how BHO got his start, it's only been mentioned on the news in passing. McCain should have been going at BHO for that and every time he said something that was impossible. Only now are the Repubs starting to say hey wait a second, BHO says he's cutting taxes on 95%, but planning on spending 1 Trillion more than we are now, wait, those numbers don't work out. McCain should have been going at this the whole time. Now unfortunately it's going to come across as desperate.

nmap
10-15-2008, 13:16
Back when Senator McCain suspended his campaign, I began to doubt his desire to win. Other stories, such as the above, add to that view.

I'll vote for him, but I have little confidence in his victory. In essence, we have a gentlemen who has tied his own hands behind his back going against a determined street-fighter. The conclusion becomes painfully obvious.

Sigaba
10-15-2008, 13:21
McCain's campaign has been on cruise control stepping very carefully to avoid offending anyone, and I fear that caution may very well cost him and our country dearly.... McCain should have been going at this the whole time. Now unfortunately it's going to come across as desperate.

I share your concern. Senator Obama has admitted in his 'memoirs' to playing conceptions of racial differences to his advantage. This practice has allowed him to deflect serious questions.

Confronting Senator Obama on his affiliations would be a challenge that requires extraordinary focus to avoid any semblance of anything else. Even then, Senator Obama and his supporters would still say the questions were "distractions" (at best).

We have done ourselves no favors with the prorogation of ill-considered sobriquets, half truths, rumors, and outright falsehoods about Senator Obama. These miscalculations are especially regrettable when the facts speak for themselves. Now, his defenders, can (and do) use examples of the miscalculations to avoid confronting the issues.

I hold firm in belief that the best way to confront Obama on Reverend Wright would be to use Reverand Wright's own words--repeatedly--and ask one question: what does Senator Obama's twenty years' silence say to you, the voter? (At best, it says that Senator Obama could not find the courage to stand up openly and decisively to a political viewpoint that is unacceptable.)

Back when Senator McCain suspended his campaign, I began to doubt his desire to win. Other stories, such as the above, add to that view.

I'll vote for him, but I have little confidence in his victory. In essence, we have a gentlemen who has tied his own hands behind his back going against a determined street-fighter. The conclusion becomes painfully obvious.

nmap, I agree. Still, I'd rather support the candidate who would rather lose an election honorably than the candidate who will do almost anything (and yet somehow manage to say nothing of substance) to win.

Red Flag 1
10-15-2008, 15:42
Back when Senator McCain suspended his campaign, I began to doubt his desire to win. Other stories, such as the above, add to that view.

I'll vote for him, but I have little confidence in his victory. In essence, we have a gentlemen who has tied his own hands behind his back going against a determined street-fighter. The conclusion becomes painfully obvious.

I will vote for him as well. Tonight is the last act to see if McCain will use both hands. I have no doubt at all that McCain be most impressive should he decide to attack. I feel McCain holds more trump cards; not using them will decide the election.

Is the gentleman fighter pilot a function of McCain's plan, or that of his advisory staff? Perhaps a twist of Lincoln's observation could be, " you can't please all the people all the time".

Like you nmap, I am also worried!


RF 1