PDA

View Full Version : The Post-American World


Doc Z
08-10-2008, 07:31
I know this article is a tad bit old, but I just read it in the most recent version of NEWSWEEK we have. I personally think NEWSWEEK is a liberal rag, that only frustrates me to no end to read.

Something about this article stuck out to me though. At first glance I thought it was another "Anti-American" trash article that I would debunk at about line 1. Then I just kept reading. I think this is a terrific example of our efforts in spreading freedom to the world finally taking root, and credit being given where it is due. It seems quite upbeat on America and our economic and foreign policies.

On the other hand though, I think the author is a bit too generous when it comes to the freedoms experienced in other nations. He also seems to be a bit of a socialist in his views. I view this article as perhaps the "chink" just before the "wedge" is placed. It seems to seek to build a complacancy in America that "being second is okay".

Let me know what you folks think.


"This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else." So begins Fareed Zakaria's important new work on the era we are now entering. Following on the success of his best-selling The Future of Freedom, Zakaria describes with equal prescience a world in which the United States will no longer dominate the global economy, orchestrate geopolitics, or overwhelm cultures. He sees the "rise of the rest"—the growth of countries like China, India, Brazil, Russia, and many others—as the great story of our time, and one that will reshape the world. The tallest buildings, biggest dams, largest-selling movies, and most advanced cell phones are all being built outside the United States. This economic growth is producing political confidence, national pride, and potentially international problems. How should the United States understand and thrive in this rapidly changing international climate? What does it mean to live in a truly global era? Zakaria answers these questions with his customary lucidity, insight, and imagination.


(this is only an exerpt, It is proving difficult to find the whole article. I may transcribe the thing directly from the magazine if you folks so desire.)




In Every Aspect of Life, Patterns of the Past Are Being Scrambled, 'And - for the First in Living Memory - the United States Does not Seem to be Leading the Charge'

'This is Something Much Broader Than the Much-Ballyhooed Rise of China or Even Asia. It Is the Rise of the Rest - the Rest of the World'

NEW YORK, May 4 /PRNewswire/ --

Americans are glum at the moment, but the facts on the ground-unemployment numbers, foreclosure rates, deaths from terror attacks -- are simply not dire enough to explain the present atmosphere of malaise, writes Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria in his forthcoming book, "The Post-American World" which is excerpted on the cover of the current issue of Newsweek. "American anxiety springs from something much deeper, a sense that large and disruptive forces are coursing through the world," Zakaria writes. "In almost every industry, in every aspect of life, it feels like the patterns of the past are being scrambled ... And-for the first time in living memory -- the United States does not seem to be leading the charge. Americans see that a new world is coming into being, but fear it is one being shaped in distant lands and by foreign people."

He writes, "In America, we are still debating the nature and extent of anti-Americanism. One side says that the problem is real and worrying and that we must woo the world back. The other says this is the inevitable price of power and that many of these countries are envious -- and vaguely French -- so we can safely ignore their griping. But while we argue over why they hate us, 'they' have moved on, and are now far more interested in other, more dynamic parts of the globe. The world has shifted from anti-Americanism to post-Americanism."

Over the last two decades, lands outside of the industrialized West have been growing at rates that were once unthinkable, Zakaria writes in the excerpt in the May 12 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, May 5). "While there have been booms and busts, the overall trend has been unambiguously upward ... This is something much broader than the much-ballyhooed rise of China or even Asia. It is the rise of the rest -- the rest of the world," he writes.


"We are living through the third great power shift in modern history. The first was the rise of the Western world, around the 15th century. It produced the world as we know it now -- science and technology, commerce and capitalism, the industrial and agricultural revolutions. It also led to the prolonged political dominance of the nations of the Western world. The second shift, which took place in the closing years of the 19th century, was the rise of the United States. Once it industrialized, it soon became the most powerful nation in the world, stronger than any likely combination of other nations.


"For the last 20 years, America's superpower status in every realm has been largely unchallenged -- something that's never happened before in history, at least since the Roman Empire dominated the known world 2,000 years ago. During this Pax Americana, the global economy has accelerated dramatically. And that expansion is the driver behind the third great power shift of the modern age -- the rise of the rest.


"At the military and political level, we still live in a unipolar world. But along every other dimension -- industrial, financial, social, cultural -- the distribution of power is shifting, moving away from American dominance. In terms of war and peace, economics and business, ideas and art, this will produce a landscape that is quite different from the one we have lived in until now -- one defined and directed from many places and by many peoples."

The antihero
08-10-2008, 09:39
Zakaria has a whole book (http://www.amazon.com/Post-American-World-Fareed-Zakaria/dp/039306235X/ref=wl_it_dp?ie=UTF8&coliid=I261FQMHKSST7O&colid=2KYEAJOZF6KYL) out with the same title.

SF_BHT
08-10-2008, 10:23
DOC Z

Did you not read what The Reaper said?

This is not Military.com.

Follow the direction that the Admins, Mods and QP's say.

Read, search, read more. If you wish to go and Pass SFAS and the School you have to have SA and follow direction.

:munchin

Doc Z
08-11-2008, 08:29
I'm not sure entirely what the issue is here. Am I not allowed to post interesting articles? I have been dedicating most of my time on this forum reading the various articles on SFAS.
I have read the quite enlightening article by "NousDefionsDoc" on "Training the Mind". I even found out that the book I read several months ago (by Warrior-Mentor), and have implented into my own platoon is highly recommended on this site for SFAS preparation. I looked over the Medical Requirements of being SF and have determined that I meet those requirements as well. I am doing dismounted patrols in Afghanistan regularly. I am increasing my PT regimine and learning from this site some ways of increasing my performance.
So wherein lies the issue? It isn't as though I posted this in an incorrect location. This is "The Soapbox" within the "At ease" Category, no? What is the very meaning of the command "at ease"? I am contributing an article on world politics, and not touting my own "greatness" (trust me, I do not possess that kind of ego). Do you think I am here to blab my mouth? If so then why have I not posted more replies? I find the topics discussed here to be in concert with my own interests. My Grandpa (18D) told me that the most important thing to learn before going to SFAS and then the "Q" was to be able to share and receive information, and follow logical instruction.
As for situational awareness, I have already gained that on this forum. I have figured out who the hot button admins (and the more easy going ones) are. In fact SF_BHT I have noticed that you typically mention a statement such as the one prior to this. Then the indivdual you are directing your information to replies, at which time they are flamed by TS or TR. Oh well though. My life does not revolve around this little smidgen of reality. So, it would seem I am quite aware that my very reply could mean my getting flamed and banned. I have come to terms with that and have chosen to post this anyway.
(Click here to see my fulfillment of TR's request (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19258))

Thank you for your time.
Doc Z

"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
-Albert Einstein

SF_BHT
08-11-2008, 09:03
I'm not sure entirely what the issue is here. Am I not allowed to post interesting articles? I have been dedicating most of my time on this forum reading the various articles on SFAS.
I have read the quite enlightening article by "NousDefionsDoc" on "Training the Mind". I even found out that the book I read several months ago (by Warrior-Mentor), and have implented into my own platoon is highly recommended on this site for SFAS preparation. I looked over the Medical Requirements of being SF and have determined that I meet those requirements as well. I am doing dismounted patrols in Afghanistan regularly. I am increasing my PT regimine and learning from this site some ways of increasing my performance.
So wherein lies the issue? It isn't as though I posted this in an incorrect location. This is "The Soapbox" within the "At ease" Category, no? What is the very meaning of the command "at ease"? I am contributing an article on world politics, and not touting my own "greatness" (trust me, I do not possess that kind of ego). Do you think I am here to blab my mouth? If so then why have I not posted more replies? I find the topics discussed here to be in concert with my own interests. My Grandpa (18D) told me that the most important thing to learn before going to SFAS and then the "Q" was to be able to share and receive information, and follow logical instruction.
As for situational awareness, I have already gained that on this forum. I have figured out who the hot button admins (and the more easy going ones) are. In fact SF_BHT I have noticed that you typically mention a statement such as the one prior to this. Then the indivdual you are directing your information to replies, at which time they are flamed by TS or TR. Oh well though. My life does not revolve around this little smidgen of reality. So, it would seem I am quite aware that my very reply could mean my getting flamed and banned. I have come to terms with that and have chosen to post this anyway.
(Click here to see my fulfillment of TR's request (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19258))

Thank you for your time.
Doc Z

"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
-Albert Einstein

1st NO - You are allowed to post articles. But you need to take that chip off your shoulder young medic.

2nd I am one of the most laid back guys when it comes to responding to people (Most of the Time). I try to guide the younger people looking for information as long as it does not waste our time and it is not something stupid. If a Admin/Mod steps in and makes a comment that is their choice and they are charged with keeping the tone of the board and making sure when people get out of line to correct them and or as you say Flame/Ban them. I do not control them and would not want to.

SA - I would say you need to back up and think about what you have just said. If you are truly looking to be successfull in an attempt to become a SF soldier than do you think getting all uppity with another QP on this board is a good thing? SA would tell you also that there are many instructors on this board and a first impression is how you will be labled. I am not going to ask for you to be banned as I have never asked for that but I would recommend if you are aspiring to become a QP you need to respect your elders as my Grandfather used to say and absorb some wisdom.:eek:

If you were a little smarter you would have noticed that I posted my response to you on this thread after you were directed on the other thread to Read/Search/Read some more by me and TR. Your apology was way after I posted on this thread. A little SA goes a long way in life.
:mad::munchin:mad:

The Reaper
08-11-2008, 11:48
Doc:

Pardon me for saying so, since you have apparently put me in some kind of box already, but I would take the suggestion to turn up your SA to heart. You seem to have entered PS.com rather like a bull in a china shop. Most SF guys and likely candidates I know would have spent a little more time checking out the AO before they started posting, especially starting new threads without searching the topic more thoroughly. Most learn by reading and searching, some prefer a more direct approach. One thing you are not likely to find in SF is a lot of hand-holding and personal assistance.

As far as this thread goes, there are a number of threads on PS.com concerning Zakaria and his works, the entire book itself was reviewed in May on its own thread in The Library:

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18240

Had you done a little looking around before starting this thread, your comments might have been better placed as a post on that thread.

Your other thread you started on SFAS boots has, as noted, been beaten to death here.

You have already been cut slack because of your military service. When a QP on this site asks you to do something, it needs to be seriously considered. You are a guest here, and should comport yourself as such. SF BHT attempted to make a spot correction, and you have rejected it. Confrontation and argumentativeness with people who have what you want is a technique, but not a good one, IMHO. If you act in a manner perceived as disrespectful in a host nation, the consequences could be much more significant than what you have seen here.

FWIW, I asked you not to post till you told me how many threads refer to SFAS issue boots. Not sure if you chose not to comply, or were unable to figure it out.

If this site is not your cup of tea, and I read that from your post, you are not required to be here. Just stop logging on or posting and read as much or as little as you wish as an unregistered guest. We help a lot of people here every day, most without requiring this sort of time and attention. This is not a flame or a dogpile, but some serious advice. Search "gray man" here for further insight.

I would tell you that first impressions are lasting ones, both here and in real life. Think about it.

Now that I have spent a few minutes trying to help, I am going to leave you to your own devices.

Best of luck.

TR

Doc Z
08-11-2008, 12:33
I apologize. It seems I was a little hard-headed (a little?:rolleyes: ) I am not going to make an excuse, I just want to explain. We just got off communication ban, and everyone knows what that means. So I came on already in a bad mood, expecting some insightful commentary on this article I posted. I obviously didn't get that, so instead of taking the lumps, I lashed out. Now TR, I checked all 358 results there were prior to posting THIS article. I didn't find anything that was related to this particular article, so I posted it. I came off on the wrong foot with the whole "SFAS Boot" thing, but I did take your advice. I want everyone to know I come here to relax and learn about what SF really is, and what I need to do to be a part of it. Thank you for not banning me, after looking over that pig-headed response, I would have banned myself. That's the beautiful thing about life though, always a new opportunity to learn.

Thanks for everything you do,
Doc Z

SF_BHT
08-11-2008, 13:12
FWIW, I asked you not to post till you told me how many threads refer to SFAS issue boots. Not sure if you chose not to comply, or were unable to figure it out.

TR I guess he still does not wish to answer your origional Question. Looks like he wants your forgiveness but is still being Sarcastic or he would not have put our little friend there.

I apologize. It seems I was a little hard-headed (a little?:rolleyes: ) I am not going to make an excuse, I just want to explain.

Even my son knows when dad scolds you are makes a recommendation you say I am Sorry Sir and he closes his mouth and moves out smartly.

Doc Z read more and absorb what is written and respond less. You again have failed to answer some or the questions put to you. You just made an excuse about this thread and 358 hits on a search about this subject. Being able to keep a cool head in stressful situations is a trait that a QP needs and if having a communications blackout gets you that upset than you may need to rethink your possible career path. What are you going to do when you get into a real High Stress position in training and or combat. Are you going to lash out or are you going to think it through and make a calm and intelligent decision nd act on it as you have been trained to do. I am thinking the latter so far. That is my first impression.

I think you need to Apologize to All or QP's here for your actions. Here is your new mission: When someone makes a Spot Correction you Will answer that communication and correct it and move out. You Will do it professionally or the ones that you have determined as Flamers will deal with you on the site.

I do not want to have to waste any more time making Spot Corrections with you. All anyone of us ask is that you Respect the people on the site and follow the rules and guidance given.

The Reaper
08-11-2008, 13:24
I am willing to chalk this up as a learning experience after a hard time in Afghanistan.

Hope it has been worth the time and effort.

Apology accepted.

TR

Doc Z
08-11-2008, 13:51
I think you need to Apologize to All or QP's here for your actions. Here is your new mission: When someone makes a Spot Correction you Will answer that communication and correct it and move out. You Will do it professionally or the ones that you have determined as Flamers will deal with you on the site.

I apologize to every QP on this forum for my misconduct.


I obviously have alot to learn.

Respectfully,
Doc Z

SF_BHT
08-11-2008, 14:12
I am willing to chalk this up as a learning experience after a hard time in Afghanistan.

Hope it has been worth the time and effort.

Apology accepted.

TR

I will chalk it up the same. Only time will tell.