PDA

View Full Version : U.S.S. Kitty Hawk to be decommissioned


Spartan359
05-28-2008, 18:24
Ah the memories of my old ship. :D




YOKOSUKA, Japan — The oldest active ship in the U.S. Navy, the USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier, made its final departure from Japan on Wednesday to be decommissioned after nearly half a century of service.

The Kitty Hawk, with sailors lining its decks, pulled away from Yokosuka port just south of Tokyo to the cheers of hundreds of schoolchildren and the sounds of brass bands.

The Kitty Hawk, the last conventionally powered aircraft carrier in the Navy, is to be replaced later this summer by the USS George Washington, a nuclear-powered carrier.

The decommissioning date for the ship is set for Jan. 31.

After leaving Japan, the Kitty Hawk will make a stop at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, then to former homeport San Diego for a welcome-home party, and then the ship will travel on to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton, Washington, to be decommissioned, Stars and Stripes reported.

Former Petty Officer 1st Class Camilo Martinez told Stars and Stripes he will attend the Kitty Hawk's decommissioning when it gets to the final resting place.

"In the Bible book of Ecclesiastes we read, ‘For everything there is an appointed time … a time for birth and a time to die...'" Martinez told Stars and Stripes in an e-mail. "Thus, even though the Hawk, in recent pictures, looks as awesome and majestic as when I first saw her, it is time for her to go."


The ship, commissioned in 1961 and the only forward-deployed aircraft carrier in the Navy, was assigned to Japan in 1998. It has since made 20 deployments in the western Pacific and participated in Operation Enduring Freedom in Iraq.

It was the oldest active ship with the longest total period of active service in the Navy.

"Since it arrived in August 1998, the Kitty Hawk has been a visible symbol of strength in a rapidly changing world," U.S. Ambassador to Tokyo Thomas Schieffer said. "Goodbye Kitty Hawk, hello George Washington."

The Kitty Hawk and its battle group are the centerpiece of the 7th Fleet, the largest in the Navy, with 40 to 50 ships, 120 aircraft and about 20,000 sailors and Marines. Roughly 21 of the ships are based in Japan and the Pacific island of Guam, while the others rotate out of ports in Hawaii and the U.S. West Coast.

Along with the other 7th Fleet ships, the battle group in Yokosuka, once a major Imperial Japanese Navy hub, has a huge area of responsibility — covering 52 million square miles of the Pacific and Indian oceans, from the international dateline to the east coast of Africa.

Japan's leadership strongly backs the U.S. military presence in the country, and says the more than 50,000 U.S. troops in Japan are a stabilizing force for all of Asia.

However, the replacement of the Kitty Hawk by a nuclear-powered ship is controversial among some here because of fears of an accident. Navy officials have stressed that the ship is safe, and pointed out that nuclear-powered submarines have long transited Yokosuka with no problems.

Concerns about the George Washington were raised again earlier this month when a fire on the ship left one sailor with minor burns and 23 others with heat stress.

Sailors extinguished the fire several hours after flames were spotted near the auxiliary boiler room and air conditioning and refrigeration space in the rear of the ship. The Navy said the fire spread through a passageway for cables.

The George Washington is scheduled to be based at Yokosuka starting August.

Go For Broke
05-29-2008, 19:26
Fair winds and following seas to the last of the CVs.

Going to be interesting with the Japanese position on nuclear vessels :munchin

Still, good reason to break out the Cruzan black strap rum

V/R,

Black Knight
06-01-2008, 17:39
Goodbye mama Hawk. Your air conditioning sucked, but your chow was second to none.

BK
WESTPAC 94

Sdiver
06-02-2008, 08:21
After leaving Japan, the Kitty Hawk will make a stop at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, then to former homeport San Diego for a welcome-home party, and then the ship will travel on to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton, Washington, to be decommissioned, Stars and Stripes reported.


Anyone hear anything what the Navy intends to do with her after her decommission?

Are they going to just scrap her, or turn her into a floating museum, like the Intrepid in NYC.

Or turn her into an artificial reef like the Oriskany?
That, IMO, would be the best for her.

Spartan359
06-03-2008, 00:39
Anyone hear anything what the Navy intends to do with her after her decommission?

Are they going to just scrap her, or turn her into a floating museum, like the Intrepid in NYC.

Or turn her into an artificial reef like the Oriskany?
That, IMO, would be the best for her.


While I'm sure I'd have a sadistic grin on my face if they sunk her, it would be sad to see her go out that way. There's enough of my blood and sweat in her to be considered a relative. Personally I'd rather she be turned into a museum so I could take the grankids to later on in life.

Besides, it would offer another opportunity to steal that GD bell in DC Central. :D

Pete S
06-03-2008, 02:12
Anyone hear anything what the Navy intends to do with her after her decommission?

Are they going to just scrap her, or turn her into a floating museum, like the Intrepid in NYC.

Or turn her into an artificial reef like the Oriskany?
That, IMO, would be the best for her.

If Bremerton is it's final stop, it will most likely be scrapped.

Red Flag 1
06-03-2008, 07:43
I am trying to remember, is Kitty Hawk the carrier John McCain served on ?

RF 1

Sdiver
06-03-2008, 08:44
I am trying to remember, is Kitty Hawk the carrier John McCain served on ?

RF 1

It was the Oriskany.


If Bremerton is it's final stop, it will most likely be scrapped.

I was afraid of that. Hopefully the Navy will see the "error" of doing so, and turn her into a Museum or an artificial reef.

The Reaper
06-03-2008, 09:33
I suspect that it will go into some kind of fleet reserve status, at least for a while.

It is almost impossible to scrap a ship in the US today due to the enviro-whackos and the unions.

At the same time, they did not want us sending the obsolete ships to other countries where they would be dismantled without addressing the proper environmental concerns to their satisfaction.

That is why I think they are using them for reefs. Not too many other ways to dispose of an 80,000 ton vessel intact.

TR