M16/M4 Bipods

[Aoresteen]

I want to get a bipod for my m16A2. Did a search found some good general info on bipods but no specific reccomendations. So here goes:

I'll be using it to fire from the prone position at the range. Right now I have a hell of a time shooting prone with IBA & helmet on. I'm swapping out the stock for an M4 type (I've decided on the LMT SOPMOD Buttstock Assembly, thanks TR :)); that should help getting the stock into my sholder correctly. A bipod will make getting the weapon stable easier.

I did some sandbag tests and a hight of about 10 or 12 inches should be good.

I need the bipod to attach to the rail under the front sights. It should be fairly easy to remove it when not needed.

I'd like the legs to fold toward the rear (toward the reciever). Our Marine brothers have one like this but I have never used it.

What are your reccomendations for a good light bipod for the M16/M4?

Thanks!

[The Reaper]

My advice is not to put a bipod on a CQB gun, like an M-4. If you are zeroing or doing precision work, just use the bags, or a rest.

I would not put a collapsible stock on a benchrest gun.

If you are looking for a bipod for a precision rifle, I like the Harris.

Have you read my M-4 thread in this forum, by chance?

I recommend that you buy two rifles, or decide which one you really want. You cannot race a tractor on a road course effectively, or plow with a sports car.

TR

[Peregrino]

Everyboby has problems firing prone with IBA and helmet on.:p (How dangerous is your range that you're in kit but still playing with a bipod?) Otherwise I agree with TR - stick to the Harris and don't put it on a CQB gun. I have both 6" and 9" versions and only use them on my SPR forgery. FWIW I don't use them very often (I prefer bagging it or using a sling) but when I do it's usually the 6" on a LaRue adapter . Hint - If you mount it with the legs forward they won't tend to collapse when you lean into them. You can also flip down one of the legs and use it as a foregrip if you like that kind of thing. Yes, they do snag that way but it's not an issue for me - I don't keep them on when they're not needed. (The LaRue takes seconds to put on - and it's bombproof.) YMMV

[Aoresteen]

Have you read my M-4 thread in this forum, by chance?


TR


TR, I did read it. Very informative article. Thanks!





Everyboby has problems firing prone with IBA and helmet on.:p (How dangerous is your range that you're in kit but still playing with a bipod?)

Peregrino, depends on your view. I'm in Iraq and we are forced to wear our kit on the range. Hell, they make us wear it driving in the IZ. Thanks for the tips.

[Peregrino]

Roger, I'm now less confused. Stick with the 6" Harris. It's less likely to snag and extends to 9" if required. I'm using the BRM-S. Register at Brownell's and get a military armorer account - they have the best prices. While you're at it get the AR-15/M16 specialty catalog. It's almost as good as an encyclopedia. Things like the Grip pod are getting a "gadget" reputation. HTH

ETA: LaRue is offering combos - Harris bipod and their adaptor for good prices. One stop shopping.

http://www.laruetactical.com/

FWIW

[mrraley]

I agree with TR about putting a bipod on a CQB rifle, but after seeing some of the troops over here in Afghanistan, I have seen them useing the "Grip Pod" and for what I don't know.

Here is a link to there web site or BQM has them for $150.

http://www.grippod.com/

[The Reaper]

Just because you can do something does not mean it is a good idea.

Lots of people use gear because of the "Cool Guy" or "CDI" factors rather than what is practical and makes sense.

You ever see any of them actually using a bipod on an M-4 in combat?

TR