PDA

View Full Version : A Purple Heart In War Of Ideas?


The Reaper
01-08-2008, 13:59
Looks like PC is rampant, and improper thought is punishable, even in a Republican administration.

TR

A Purple Heart In War Of Ideas?

By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.

When the history of the George W. Bush administration is written, one of the most important questions to be addressed will surely be: Why did a president who repeatedly talked about the ideology animating our enemies in this "War on Terror" do so little to wage an effective "War of Ideas" against it?

The good news is that historians — and the rest of us — have just been given an insight into that highly consequential disconnect. The bad news is that the incident suggests a problem of such ominous proportions that it raises questions as to whether our government is being rendered incapable of fighting successfully an ideology best described as Islamofascism at home, to say nothing of abroad.

The incident involves the firing last week of the Pentagon's foremost authority on the Islamofascist theo-political-legal code known as Shariah. According to reporting by Bill Gertz, The Washington Times' intrepid national security correspondent, Stephen Coughlin, a major in the U.S. Army Reserves who has served as a civilian lawyer to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, fell "afoul of a key aide to [Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon] England, Hasham Islam."

Unnamed Pentagon sources told Mr. Gertz that the latter, employed by the deputy secretary to help with Muslim outreach, "confronted Mr. Coughlin during a meeting several weeks ago when Mr. Islam sought to have Mr. Coughlin soften his views on Islamist extremism." At issue evidently was Maj. Coughlin's fastidious chronicling of the true nature and activities of organizations such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). In briefings prepared for the U.S. military, he had concluded that ISNA is one of a number of front organizations for the Muslim Brotherhood — a particularly insidious wing of the Islamofascist movement that shares with its ideological soulmates a commitment to imposing Shariah worldwide, albeit putatively through nonviolent means.

Interestingly, the Justice Department arrived at a similar conclusion, as evidenced in its designation of ISNA as an unindicted co-conspirator in the recent trial of the Holy Land Foundation. The latter operated as an Islamist "charity" in Houston until it was shut down by the government after September 11, 2001, and charged with providing funds to Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist organization. While the lengthy proceeding resulted in a mistrial (due, it appears, to misconduct by a self-professed Hamas-sympathizing juror), documents placed in the record by prosecutors are damning with respect to connections between Saudi-financed influence operations like the ISNA and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on the one hand and various bad actors around the globe on the other.

Evidently, however, the Islamic Society of North America is one of the organizations with whom Hasham Islam has encouraged Pentagon outreach. When Steve Coughlin refused to modify his assessment of the organization, Mr. Islam reportedly accused him of being "a Christian zealot with a pen." Such a description calls to mind the terms "racist" and "bigot" used to silence others who have raised alarms about efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and its fellow-travelers to penetrate our government and society.

Thus branded, Maj. Coughlin has become "too hot" for the Joint Chiefs and is now what Mr. Gertz calls "a casualty of the War of Ideas." Perhaps he will receive its first Purple Heart.

If allowed to stand, the effect of Maj. Coughlin's dismissal would be a surgical strike on a man who is arguably one of the most knowledgeable opponents of Shariah — not only in the Defense Department, but inside the entire U.S. government.

Sadly, it was but the latest of a series of successes for our enemies in the undeclared war against Islamofascism, including the following:

*Karen Hughes, President Bush's close friend and, until recently, his point-person in the War of Ideas as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy, reportedly considered as her "guru" a professor at Georgetown University whose program is underwritten by a $20 million grant from a Saudi prince.

*Unsurprisingly, Mrs. Hughes' first public appearance after assuming her responsibilities at State was an address to the annual ISNA conference in 2005. While there, she told the organization's members she considered them "the front-line in public diplomacy because you are more credible than I am." Interestingly, a survey of her "frontline" troops, found that, by a 3-to-1margin, ISNA's members believe the U.S. government had advanced knowledge of the September 11, 2001, attacks and allowed them to happen.

*Muslim chaplains and lay leaders for the U.S. military were recruited, trained and credentialed by an organization that the Wall Street Journal described as "part of Saudi Arabia's state-run university system." At the time, that institute was operated by Aburahman Alamoudi, the godfather of the Islamist apparatus in America who is now serving a 23-year prison sentence for terrorism financing and related charges.

*FBI personnel continue to receive "sensitivity training" from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, even though the Justice Department has also designated it an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case.

Many more examples of Islamist penetration and influence operations could be cited. Suffice it to say that, as long as such activities are allowed — and those like Steve Coughlin who challenge them are fired or cowed — neither Mr. Bush nor his successors will be able to properly comprehend, let alone prevail in, the War of Ideas and the larger War for the Free World of which it is a central front.

Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy and a columnist for The Washington Times.

Peregrino
01-08-2008, 18:52
In cleaning this for publication I deliberately removed the signature line - it's an active duty officer.

Interesting

Subject: Commandant's Army Advisor Note: Joint Staff Islamic Law Scholar sacked....

MAJ (USAR) Stephen Coughlin is to my knowledge the only Islamic Law scholar on the Joint Staff...

He is a lawyer by training and a reserve Military Intelligence Officer. His first interface with Islamic Law began in Pakistan where he was investigating and prosecuting an intellectual property rights case about 10 years ago. Reviewing Pakistani property rights law, he kept seeing footnoted references to the Quran and sharia law...

I have long argued and wondered why our military from senior leaders down to tactical level are so unread and unstudied on Islam, jihad in Islam, even the topic of terrorism. I have often contrasted this unconscionable wartime state of affairs, with the due diligence the US military showed since I was a cadet at West Point 30 years ago, where we lived, ate, slept and drank Soviet war fighting doctrine...it was the threat we oriented on and we developed our own doctrine around-- “AirLand Battle” in the early 1980’s.

Can anyone show me where the equivalent of the Soviet threat doctrine series for the global war on terror is published?

…It has not been done.

Yet today we are in the process of prosecuting war, that from doctrinal perspective, we fundamentally do not understand. Over two years I have had 90 of the Army’s top majors come through ACSC, across all branches including MI and special operations forces, and only one had read a book with the title Understanding Terror Networks, that by Marc Sageman...

Just before Christmas I presented a lecture on Understanding Terrorist and Insurgent Support Systems to an interagency audience at the Joint Special Operations University, that included Joint Staff and Joint Command officers, DIA and other IC reps, DHS and law enforcement... there, two people had read Sageman’s work...two out of the special ops community. The third individual was Sageman himself.

More importantly we have not studied Islamic Law and few have seen or heard of even the English translation of it that has been in print for years, none had at JSOU or had read a work titled Understanding Jihad, War and Peace in the Law of Islam or even The Quranic Concept of War...I can go on but let me be frank.

This failure of intellectual preparation is a leadership failure, and it is as the 9-11 Commission warned, a failure of vision.

We have spent much intellectual capitol revamping and analyzing our own doctrine as it relates to counterinsurgency...it’s time we do our homework on the threat.

Coughlin has briefed senior Marine Corps leaders and staff and has presented his thesis in various military educational venues...by all accounts the veil of ignorance is lifted for all but only a few who are afraid to face what Islamic Law, doctrinal Islam, says and means with respect to jihad and how it plays out across the Islamic world from al Qaida, to the Saudi government, to Pakistan to the Muslim Brotherhood...

What Coughlin did was provide the epiphany in his over 300-page Joint Military Intelligence College thesis titled, “To Our Great Detriment”: Ignoring What Extremists Say About Jihad” that is meticulously documented and powerfully argued.

In short, he argues we have in fact intellectually pre-empted our military decision making process and intelligence preparation of the battlefield process, the critical step 3—“evaluate the threat.” Strategically we have failed to do that by substituting policy for military analysis, for substituting cliché for competent decision processes.

We began on September 12, 2001 with “Islam is a religion of peace” which soothed ideological sentiments of many but has failed us strategically, short-stopped the objective, sytstemic evaluation of the threat doctrine.

“Islam is a religion of peace” is fine for public policy statements, but is not and cannot be the point of departure for competent military or intelligence analysis...it is in fact a logical flaw under any professional research methodology...you have stated the conclusion before you have done the analysis.

If one has studied the implication of the Holy Land Foundation trial discovery documents as I have, as a former DIA senior military analyst, and understanding as even Bill Gertz has written in his book, Enemies about the dismal record of our counter-intelligence one has to wonder and question the extent we are in fact penetrated in government and academia by foreign agents of influence, the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamists and those who truly in essence do not share our social compact.

The termination of Stephen Coughlin on the Joint Staff is an act of intellectual cowardice.

We can only hope he can be positioned in his next venue to continue to educate our military for the fight we are in-- if we don’t understand the war and the enemy we are engaged against we remain vulnerable and we cannot win.

No victory in the war on terror.


:munchin:munchin:munchin:munchin

Article published Jan 4, 2008
Inside the Ring


January 4, 2008


By Bill Gertz - Coughlin sacked

Stephen Coughlin, the Pentagon specialist on Islamic law and Islamist extremism, has been fired from his position on the military's Joint Staff. The action followed a report in this space last week revealing opposition to his work for the military by pro-Muslim officials within the office of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England.

Mr. Coughlin was notified this week that his contract with the Joint Staff will end in March, effectively halting the career of one of the U.S. government's most important figures in analyzing the nature of extremism and ultimately preparing to wage ideological war against it.

He had run afoul of a key aide to Mr. England, Hasham Islam, who confronted Mr. Coughlin during a meeting several weeks ago when Mr. Islam sought to have Mr. Coughlin soften his views on Islamist extremism.

Mr. Coughlin was accused directly by Mr. Islam of being a Christian zealot or extremist "with a pen," according to defense officials. Mr. Coughlin appears to have become one of the first casualties in the war of ideas with Islamism.

The officials said Mr. Coughlin was let go because he had become "too hot" or controversial within the Pentagon.

Misguided Pentagon officials, including Mr. Islam and Mr. England, have initiated an aggressive "outreach" program to U.S. Muslim groups that critics say is lending credibility to what has been identified as a budding support network for Islamist extremists, including front groups for the radical Muslim Brotherhood.

Mr. Coughlin wrote a memorandum several months ago based on documents made public in a federal trial in Dallas that revealed a covert plan by the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egyptian-origin Islamist extremist group, to subvert the United States using front groups. Members of one of the identified front groups, the Islamic Society of North America, has been hosted by Mr. England at the Pentagon.

After word of the confrontation between Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Islam was made public, support for Mr. Coughlin skyrocketed among those in and out of government who feared the worst, namely that pro-Muslim officials in the Pentagon were after Mr. Coughlin's scalp, and that his departure would be a major setback for the Pentagon's struggling g efforts to develop a war of ideas against extremism. Blogs lit up with hundreds of postings, some suggesting that Mr. England's office is "penetrated" by the enemy in the war on terrorism.

Kevin Wensing, a spokesman for Mr. England, said "no one in the deputy's office had any input into this decision" by the Joint Staff to end Mr. Coughlin's contract. A Joint Staff spokesman had no immediate comment.

Team Sergeant
01-08-2008, 19:30
Subject: Commandant's Army Advisor Note: Joint Staff Islamic Law Scholar sacked....

MAJ (USAR) Stephen Coughlin is to my knowledge the only Islamic Law scholar on the Joint Staff...




That's one giant step for moslems and one giant leap for islamic extremism.

Disgusting.

Bill Harsey
01-11-2008, 10:51
TR,
Good post. Col. O. sent it to me in email, looked before posting and as usual your on top the important things.

I view this as a keystone to the entire situation. This is causing much stuff up in "The District of..." as it should.

Here is some follow up: http://http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/InsidetheRing.html (http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/InsidetheRing.html)

Warrior-Mentor
07-10-2008, 18:23
Met Stephen Coughlin today. Am interested to read his Master's Thesis:

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/12/stephen-coughlin%E2%80%99s-treatise-on-jihad-available-online/

Summary draws a parallel between our failure to read and heed Mein Kampf...and now ignoring our enemies published strategic plan...

nmap
07-10-2008, 19:03
Saudi Arabia and other ME countries control a great deal of money. The U.S. borrows a lot.

And so, Abu Dhabi Investment Council buys a 75% stake in the Chrysler building in New York. Boston Properties, with funding from the investment authorities of Qatar and Kuwait, and Meraas Capital, a Dubai-based private equity fund, bought the General Motors building for US$2.8bn earlier this year. Which merely scratches the surface of the wealth transfer from us to them.

With their money, they can pull many strings. A Google search suggests they have extensive media holdings. Perhaps they can pull political strings. And through that, all other strings.

I am reminded of QP Peregrino's quote from Cicero.

jatx
07-10-2008, 19:26
Saudi Arabia and other ME countries control a great deal of money. The U.S. borrows a lot.

And so, Abu Dhabi Investment Council buys a 75% stake in the Chrysler building in New York. Boston Properties, with funding from the investment authorities of Qatar and Kuwait, and Meraas Capital, a Dubai-based private equity fund, bought the General Motors building for US$2.8bn earlier this year. Which merely scratches the surface of the wealth transfer from us to them.

With their money, they can pull many strings. A Google search suggests they have extensive media holdings. Perhaps they can pull political strings. And through that, all other strings.

I am reminded of QP Peregrino's quote from Cicero.

I read a lot of your posts. This reading is usually concluded by a mouth full of blood, as I have bitten my tongue. The post above is pure drivel. Do you not realize that when financing a piece of property using more debt than equity, a foreign investor incurs a liability instead of acquiring wealth (neither of the transactions above were arbitrage plays)? Yet from this flawed analysis of the basic facts you are able to spin the most fabulous story!

Team Sergeant
07-10-2008, 19:32
I read a lot of your posts. This reading is usually concluded by a mouth full of blood, as I have bitten my tongue. The post above is pure drivel. Do you not realize that when financing a piece of property using more debt than equity, a foreign investor incurs a liability instead of acquiring wealth (neither of the transactions above were arbitrage plays)? Yet from this flawed analysis of the basic facts you are able to spin the most fabulous story!

jatx,

I was also reading about the recent purchase of the GM building by the Arabs. Please expound (for us not so investment minded) on why this is not such a big deal?

TS

The Reaper
07-10-2008, 20:03
jatx,

I was also reading about the recent purchase of the GM building by the Arabs. Please expound (for us not so investment minded) on why this is not such a big deal?

TS

Pardon me for butting in, but remember when the Japanese were buying up the US?

Do you recall when they bought Pebble Beach Golf Course?

How did that venture turn out? What happened to their investments?

TR

Team Sergeant
07-10-2008, 20:17
Pardon me for butting in, but remember when the Japanese were buying up the US?

Do you recall when they bought Pebble Beach Golf Course?

How did that venture turn out? What happened to their investments?

TR


In fact I read about the Pebble Beach purchase also. I was living in Monterey when the Japanese placed a fence around the lone cypress tree. Everyone was calling it the “lone bonsai tree”.;)

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2714596820049058686zBUPRA

I will readily admit I do not know enough about global finance to discuss it on an expert level, hence the question to jatx to expound on his post.

TS

nmap
07-10-2008, 20:53
I read a lot of your posts. This reading is usually concluded by a mouth full of blood, as I have bitten my tongue. The post above is pure drivel. Do you not realize that when financing a piece of property using more debt than equity, a foreign investor incurs a liability instead of acquiring wealth (neither of the transactions above were arbitrage plays)? Yet from this flawed analysis of the basic facts you are able to spin the most fabulous story!

Well, let's take a look at the transactions. Then, perhaps you can tell me where you see flaws.

The OPEC countries are benefiting from a positive balance of payments, and both individuals and governments have funds available for investment.

The various entities then procure U.S. properties and assets. For the sake of discussion, let us suppose that some arrangements are leveraged. So, perhaps they put up some money, and borrowed some. They would still have a positive net value on a building. That sounds like equity.

Based on the negative balance of trade and the ongoing budget deficit, it sounds to me as if we - both our nation and our corporations - are transferring our productive assets to them so we can get the cash we need. The Citibank transaction is a case in point. LINK (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/11/04/ccciti304.xml) The cash infusion from Prince AlWaleed bin Talal's - $4 billion worth - seemed to be most welcome, as Citibank tried to deal with subprime mortgages. It is, perhaps, worth noting that no U.S. investor appeared to do this. Perhaps the Prince, despite his reputation as the Saudi Warren Buffet, is not a wise investor...

I also mentioned that, with a Google search, there is every indication they own parts of U.S. media companies. From this, I infer they have some ability to shape content. I would be surprised if holders of large equity stakes do not have some ability to modify reporting. Here's a sample LINK (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/dec/12/newscorporation.rupertmurdoch)

This leads me to the view that they can influence at least a few political leaders.

If you don't agree with the above, I'd like to see what you thoughts are.





Pardon me for butting in, but remember when the Japanese were buying up the US?

Do you recall when they bought Pebble Beach Golf Course?

How did that venture turn out? What happened to their investments?

TR

Yes, Sir, good point. I seem to recall they had a similar outcome with Rockefeller Center.

Again, as I recall, Japan was at the top of an economic cycle...it was a time when 3/4 of a square mile of land under the Imperial Palace in Tokyo was worth the same as the entire state of California. (From Asia's Financial Crisis and the Role of Real Estate). The good times ended, they needed to raise cash, so they sold U.S. properties at a loss.

Perhaps OPEC will suffer a similar reversal. But in the meantime, I would think some politicians would be sufficiently venal to be tempted, and hence influenced.

I would, as always, value your thoughts on the matter.

Warrior-Mentor
01-13-2010, 10:20
Frank Gaffney interviews Steve Coughlin here.

Muslim Brotherhood front groups and their apologists never tire of pointing out the strict Koranic injunctions against killing innocents. This is, of course, dissembling [taqiyya].

In a rare radio interview, Major Stephen Coughlin (expert in Islamic law and former adviser to the Joint Chiefs of Staff)
tackles an issue of the utmost importance: who is innocent under Shariah law– and who is it permissible to kill?
This distinction makes all the difference.

AUDIO LINK: (Runs 12 minutes from 27:00 to 39:00)
http://www.securefreedomradio.org/2010/01/05/tuesday-january-5-2010-kit-bond-major-stephen-coughlin-and-andy-mccarthy/

T-Rock
11-29-2015, 03:32
Regarding Major Stephen Coughlin, he's recently come out with a book that contains information from the "Red Pill" pentagon briefs. I haven't read it yet but plan on doing so.

A series of videos, entitled the "Red Pill" brief are below, along with a link to his book, "Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad"

Video lectures: http://vladtepesblog.com/stephen-coughlin-red-pill-brief-all-10-videos/

Book: http://www.amazon.com/Catastrophic-Failure-Blindfolding-America-Jihad/dp/1511617500