PDA

View Full Version : The Most Sweeping Gun Ban Ever Introduced In Congress - HR 1022 IH


tsod275
03-30-2007, 08:47
I was absolutely annoyed when I saw that the bill was actually suggested. Considering we all love firearms, I would assume anyway, I thought I would put this in the general discussion area. Figured it wouldn't hurt to let everyone know one of the bills that is out there. Anyway, here it is.

Link to Bill Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 (HR 1022 IH) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1022.IH:

The following was written by the NRA

Saturday, February 24, 2007

On Feb. 14, 2007, Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced H.R. 1022, a bill with the stated purpose, “to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.”

McCarthy’s verbiage warrants explanation. Presumably, what she means by “assault weapons ban” is the Clinton Gun Ban of 1994. Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004 for multiple reasons, including the fact that federal, state and local law enforcement agency studies showed that guns affected by the ban had been used in only a small percentage of crime, before and after the ban was imposed.

With the nation’s murder rate 43% lower than in 1991, and the re-legalized guns still used in only a small percentage of crime, reauthorizing the Clinton Gun Ban would be objectionable enough. But McCarthy’s “other purposes” would make matters even worse. H.R. 1022 would ban every gun banned by the Clinton ban, plus millions more guns, including:

• Every gun made to comply with the Clinton ban. (The Clinton ban dictated the kinds of grips, stocks and attachments new guns could have. Manufacturers modified new guns to the Clinton requirements. H.R. 1022 would ban the modified guns too.)

• Guns exempted by the Clinton ban. (Ruger Mini-14s and -30s and Ranch Rifles; .30 cal. carbines; and fixed-magazine, semi-automatic, center-fire rifles that hold more than 10 rounds.)

• All semi-automatic shotguns. (E.g., Remington, Winchester, Beretta and Benelli, used for hunting, sport shooting, and self-defense. H.R. 1022 would ban them because they have “any characteristic that can function as a grip,” and would also ban their main component, called the “receiver.”)

• All detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles-including, for example, the ubiquitous Ruger 10/22 .22 rimfire-because they have “any characteristic that can function as a grip.”

• Target shooting rifles. (E.g., the three centerfire rifles most popular for marksmanship competitions: the Colt AR-15, the Springfield M1A and the M1 “Garand.”)

• Any semi-automatic shotgun or rifle an Attorney General one day claims isn’t “sporting,” even though the constitutions of the U.S. and 44 states, and the laws of all 50 states, recognize the right to use guns for defense.

• 65 named guns (the Clinton law banned 19 by name); semi-auto fixed-magazine pistols of over 10 rounds capacity; and frames, receivers and parts used to repair or refurbish guns.

H.R. 1022 would also ban the importation of magazines exempted by the Clinton ban, ban the sale of a legally-owned “assault weapon” with a magazine of over 10 rounds capacity, and begin backdoor registration of guns, by requiring private sales of banned guns, frames, receivers and parts to be conducted through licensed dealers. Finally, whereas the Clinton Gun Ban was imposed for a 10-year trial period, H.R. 1022 would be a permanent ban.

Please be sure to contact your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to oppose H.R. 1022!

You can call your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121.

Copyright 2007, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action. This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.

Radar Rider
03-30-2007, 09:49
Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004 for multiple reasons, including the fact that federal, state and local law enforcement agency studies showed that guns affected by the ban had been used in only a small percentage of crime, before and after the ban was imposed.

Is this blindingly obvious only to me? Does this not say that whether a gun is banned or not, CRIMINALS ARE STILL GOING TO USE THEM? I may be wrong, but isn't that why they're called criminals? Idiots. Enforce the laws that are the books now, and stop the political grandstanding.

The Reaper
03-30-2007, 09:54
Hey, TSOD:

Wouldn't that be the same HR 1022 as discussed here?:D

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13522

TR

Rogue
03-30-2007, 09:58
Just imagine if Hillary Clinton gets elected. :eek: That's why I've decide to stock up on all supplies, extra magazines and ammo. God only knows what's in store for us. It has also been written, that the District Court ruling on guns in the DC area could cause the Supreme Court to swing either way in regards to gun rights, and the interpretation of individual rights in the 2nd Amendment. I guess that if there are any firearms on anyones wish list, they better buy now if they have they money. Who knows what the future holds. Now is a good time to join the NRA if you haven't already. If you have friends who don't belong, get them to join. Write or call your Senators and Congressman. This is not a time to be passive. It's also sad that many gun owners and hunters are being fooled by new Gun Rights / Hunting Groups which are actually fronts for the anti-gun crowd. Be aware, be smart.

tsod275
03-30-2007, 10:55
Hey, TSOD:

Wouldn't that be the same HR 1022 as discussed here?:D

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13522

TR

Mmmmm....darn....Oh well...:D

Well...guess the question is...how many folks called their U.S. Rep's and inquired about it? I did, for what it was worth.

Rogue
03-30-2007, 13:09
I second that...... Letters and Calls

TF Kilo
03-30-2007, 15:39
ear Mr. TF Kilo ,



Thank you for contacting me to express on H.R. 1022, the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act. I appreciate your comments and concerns. I believe the original intent of the Second Amendment was to protect each individual's right to keep and bear arms and I will continue to defend that right.



As Alaska's Representative in Congress for thirty-five years, I have sponsored and cosponsored many bills and resolutions that ensure a law-abiding citizen's right to own firearms. In the past, I cosponsored The District of Columbia Personal Protection Act which would restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia. I have also continued to oppose any ban on so-called "assault weapons" and will continue to contest similar legislation which may be introduced by my colleagues.



H.R. 1022 is a direct violation of the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution. I firmly believe that any attempt by legislators to restrict an American's right to protect themself is an abridgement of the fundamental beliefs of our founding fathers. The Assault Weapon ban signed into law by President Clinton has been an utter failure and I will not support any attempt by lawmakers to reauthorize this miserable policy.



Once again, thank you for expressing your views on this issue. If you haven't already done so, I would encourage you to sign up for my e-newsletter at http://donyoung.house.gov/IMA/issue_subscribe.htm . This will allow me to provide you with updates on this and other important issues. If I can be of any assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me.





Sincerely,

DON YOUNG

Congressman for All Alaska

tsod275
03-30-2007, 18:52
Here is the petition for it....I was number 33,XXX so far. Apparently, we are not the only ones that are not impressed.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409898348