PDA

View Full Version : Boxer vs. Rice


echoes
01-12-2007, 12:42
IMHO, shouldn't discussion be about startegy? How tacky!:rolleyes:

1-12-07
(Fox News)

WASHINGTON — The White House fired back Friday at Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer's verbal slap at Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, calling the California Democrat's caustic comments about Rice's family life "outrageous."

Boxer lit into Rice on Thursday with bitter diatribe during a heated line of questioning before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee looking into Iraq policies. At one point, Boxer turned to the broad question of who pays the ultimate price for war. Rice has never married and has no children.

"Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young," Boxer said. "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families."

Rice told FOX News' Jim Angle that she was confused by Boxer's comments at first.

"I guess that means I don't have kids. Was that the purpose?" Rice said. "At the time I just found it a bit confusing, frankly, in retrospect, I thought single women had come further than that. The only question is are you making good decisions because you have kids?"

White House spokesman Tony Snow on Friday called Boxer's comments "outrageous."

"I don't know if she was intentionally that tacky, but I do think it's outrageous. Here you got a professional woman, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Barbara Boxer is sort of throwing little jabs because Condi doesn't have children, as if that means that she doesn't understand the concerns of parents. Great leap backward for feminism," Snow told FOX News Talk's Brian and The Judge.

Boxer released a statement Friday to FOXNews.com through her spokeswoman, Natalie Ravitz, saying:

"I spoke the truth at the committee hearing, which is that neither Secretary Rice nor I have family members that will pay the price for this escalation. My point was to focus attention on our military families who continue to sacrifice because this Administration has not developed a political solution to the situation in Iraq."

Airbornelawyer
01-12-2007, 12:47
Boxer can't make the chickenhawk argument, since she herself nor likely anyone in her immediate family has served in the military, so this is her version of it.

Sionnach
01-12-2007, 14:35
This woman gets under my skin more than Pelosi and Clinton. Yes, I know that's hard to believe. It just shows you how unprofessional "professional politicians" are.

The Reaper
01-12-2007, 20:25
I'd wager that Sec Rice knows more military personnel and has more in her extended family than Sen Boxer does.

TR

Radar Rider
01-12-2007, 20:55
Boxer is a disgusting stupid person. Condoleeza Rice is the greatest person for both women and African-Americans to emulate, but the democRATs only seek to attack and belittle her. Ms. Rice's strength is that she doesn't let such nasty attacks bother her.

As for the democRATs? So much for acceptance and diversity. :rolleyes:

echoes
01-13-2007, 02:02
I'd wager that Sec Rice knows more military personnel and has more in her extended family than Sen Boxer does.TR

Sir, agreed. And let's not forget the Tuna. (Yep, I watch C-Span),
and woah, just bringing up American Samoa...Starkist Tuna, San Fran, Pelosi...

What a world we live in.

Holly

Ranger Luna
01-13-2007, 09:08
Boxer is a piece of work. Just think, she and Pelosi are from the wonderful state I call home.:mad:

Because of this story, I was surprised to find that Dr. Rice has never been married.