PDA

View Full Version : Culture of Corruption?


The Reaper
05-21-2006, 16:26
Hmm, not hearing too much about this one.

Wonder if the Dems plan to make the hay out of this that they did Duke Cunningham?

TR

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,196379,00.html

Documents Allege Rep. Jefferson Caught on Tape Taking Bribe
Sunday, May 21, 2006

WASHINGTON — A congressman under investigation for bribery was caught on videotape accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from an FBI informant whose conversations with the lawmaker also were recorded, according to a court document released Sunday. Agents later found the cash hidden in his freezer.

At one audiotaped meeting, Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., chuckles about writing in code to keep secret what the government contends was his corrupt role in getting his children a cut of a communications company's deal for work in Africa.

As Jefferson and the informant passed notes about what percentage the lawmaker's family might receive, the congressman "began laughing and said, 'All these damn notes we're writing to each other as if we're talking, as if the FBI is watching,"' according to the affidavit.

Jefferson, who represents New Orleans, has not been charged and denies any wrongdoing.

As for the $100,000, the government says Jefferson got the money in a leather briefcase last July 30 at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Arlington. The plan was for the lawmaker to use the cash to bribe a high-ranking Nigerian official — the name is blacked out in the court document — to ensure the success of a business deal in that country, the affidavit said.

All but $10,000 was recovered on Aug. 3 when the FBI searched Jefferson's home in Washington. The money was stuffed in his freezer, wrapped in $10,000 packs and concealed in food containers and aluminum foil.

Two of Jefferson's associates have pleaded guilty to bribery-related charges in federal court in Alexandria. One, businessman Vernon Jackson of Louisville, Ky., admitted paying more than $400,000 in bribes to the lawmaker in exchange for his help securing business deals for Jackson's telecommunications company in Nigeria and other African countries.

The new details about the case emerged after federal agents searched Jefferson's congressional office on Capitol Hill Saturday night and Sunday. The nearly 100-page affidavit for a search warrant, made public Sunday with large portions blacked out, spells out much of the evidence so far.

The document includes excerpts of conversations between Jefferson and an unidentified business executive from northern Virginia. She agreed to wear a wire after she approached the FBI with complaints that Jefferson and an associate had ripped her off in a business deal.

Jefferson's lawyer, Robert Trout, contended that the prosecutors' disclosure was "part of a public relations agenda and an attempt to embarrass Congressman Jefferson. The affidavit itself is just one side of the story which has not been tested in court," Trout said in a statement.

The affidavit says Jefferson is caught on videotape at the Ritz-Carlton as he takes a reddish-brown briefcase from the trunk of the informant's car, slips it into a cloth bag, puts the bag into his 1990 Lincoln Town Car and drives away.

The $100 bills in the suitcase had the same serial numbers as those found in Jefferson's freezer.

While the name of the intended recipient of the $100,000 is blacked out, other details in the affidavit indicate he is Abubakar Atiku, Nigeria's vice president. He owns a home in Potomac, Md., that authorities have searched as part of the Jefferson investigation.

Jefferson assured the FBI informant in their coded conversations that he paid the money to the Nigerian official, even though the money was still in Jefferson's possession when agents searched his home Aug. 3.

On Aug. 1, two days after Jefferson picked up the $100,000, the informant called Jefferson to ask about the status of "the package."

Jefferson responded: "I gave him the African art that you gave me and he was very pleased."

When Jefferson and the informant had dinner at a Washington restaurant on May 12, 2005, the FBI was listening, too. Jefferson indicates he will need an increased stake in the profits of one deal, the affidavit said. Instead of the 7 percent stake originally agreed upon, he writes "18-20" on a piece of paper and passes it to the informant.

That is when negotiations move ahead and notes go back and forth, ending with Jefferson's laughter about the FBI watching it all.

Throughout the conversations, Jefferson makes attempts to deflect direct connections to any bribes.

He tells the informant at one point that money should be paid to businesses operated by his children. "I make a deal for my children. It wouldn't be me," Jefferson said, according to the affidavit.

In a different conversation, Jefferson seeks to distance himself from bribes that must be paid to Nigerian government officials to facilitate transactions.

"If he's gotta pay Minister X, we don't want to know. It's not our deal," Jefferson told the witness, according to the affidavit. "We're not paying Minister X a damn thing. That's all, you know, international fraud crap. We're not doing that. We're not doing any of that that gets us (unintelligible)."

The affidavit also spells out "seven other schemes" in which Jefferson was involved; nearly all were blacked out in the document.

The Jefferson investigation has provided fodder for Republicans who have suffered black eyes in the investigations of current and former GOP lawmakers, including Tom DeLay and Randy "Duke" Cunningham.

Jefferson, who has pledged not to resign from Congress in the face of the bribery investigation, speculated about his political future in one of the recorded conversations.

When the informant asked Jefferson about his political plans, he responded: "I'm gonna get your deal out of the way ... and I probably won't last long after that."

Monsoon65
05-21-2006, 16:41
I just got thru reading this on Yahoo. What are these people thinking? They won't get caught? Or that they are above the law??? I guess he thought it was OK because it was for "his children".

I think the Dems are going to complain that the Republicans are hunting them down because of DeLay and Cunningham.

Gypsy
05-21-2006, 21:47
Gee all this AND the people of NOLA re-elected Nagin. Outstanding. :rolleyes:


All but $10,000 was recovered on Aug. 3 when the FBI searched Jefferson's home in Washington. The money was stuffed in his freezer, wrapped in $10,000 packs and concealed in food containers and aluminum foil.



Kind of gives new meaning to the phrase cold hard cash...

Goggles Pizano
05-22-2006, 08:42
What are these people thinking They won't get caught? Or that they are above the law??? I guess he thought it was OK because it was for "his children".

I think the Dems are going to complain that the Republicans are hunting them down because of DeLay and Cunningham.

1) Yes, that is what they thought.
2) See #1
3) See #1

Of course they are going to complain, it's what they do best. Solutions? We don't need no stinking solutions!

Republican breaks the law=bad!
Democrat breaks the law=misunderstood.:rolleyes:

Firebeef
05-22-2006, 11:13
The fine people of the great state of Lou-eez-ee-ana will NOT tolerate corruption amonst their elected officials.........

......................................... they INSIST upon it!

lrd
05-22-2006, 11:30
Gee all this AND the people of NOLA re-elected Nagin. Outstanding. :rolleyes:

Just what I was thinking, Gypsy.

I was born there, but we must have moved before I learned to understand NOLA politics. ;)

924(c)
05-23-2006, 09:14
With the Jefferson investigation being the current Republican and Democratic "spin" fest, I am curious as the actual status of the Government's case. I certainly believe that the US Attorney's office and the FBI must be at some type of impasse. There was definitely a reason that they released the Search Warrant affidavit. However, with the possible bribery related violation apparently occurring last August, I am curious as to the reason Jefferson was not arrested, via Criminal Complaint. One must read between the lines...although both of Jefferson's "business associates" entered guilty pleas, one cannot assume that they are cooperating with the US Attorney's Office or the FBI. It will be interesting to see how the investigation shakes out.

My point of view may be a bit jaded, as I don't have much love for the FBI.

MtnGoat
05-23-2006, 10:05
No really mom I didn't have my hand in the cookie jar.

Both sides can cry wolf over this, but it's funny how this hasn't made the news. I guess because he is a New Orleans, LA Rep and they don't need a more bad PR. We just had the Mayor race this weekend and everything went well with it.

So let just push this one under the rug for a while.

Surf n Turf
05-23-2006, 21:18
So let just push this one under the rug for a while.


MtnGoat,
This may be your answer ---- and it sure looks like they are protecting themselves --- SnT

Hastert tells President Bush FBI raid was unconstitutional
By Patrick O’Connor
House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) told President Bush yesterday that he is concerned the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) raid on Rep. William Jefferson’s (D-La.) congressional office over the weekend was a direct violation of the Constitution

“Republican objections are independent of any facts in the corruption probe against Jefferson. Their complaints pertain solely to constitutional questions about the raid itself”
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/052406/jefferson.html

keith
05-24-2006, 12:15
Apparently, he's the victim now:

Angry lawmakers demand FBI return seized documents
Search of congressman's office unconstitutional, they say

WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert demanded Wednesday that the FBI surrender documents and other items agents seized on Capitol Hill in what lawmakers said was an unconstitutional raid.

"I think those materials ought to be returned," said Hastert, adding that the FBI agents involved "ought to be frozen out of that (case) for the sake of the Constitution."

Later in the article...

"We are hoping that there's a way to balance the constitutional concerns of the House of Representatives with the law enforcement obligations of the executive branch," White House press secretary Tony Snow said. "Obviously we are taking note of Speaker Hastert's statements."

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales tried to strike a conciliatory tone, saying, "We have a great deal of respect for the Congress as a coequal branch of government."

But he also defended the search: "We have an obligation to the American people to pursue the evidence where it exists."

Justice Department officials said the decision to search Jefferson's office was made in part because he refused to comply with a subpoena for documents last summer. Jefferson reported the subpoena to the House on September 15, 2005.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/24/raid.on.congress.ap/index.html